Journal of Research in Dental
and Maxillofacial Sciences
Volume 10, Issue 4 (12-2025)
J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci 2025, 10(4): 262-273 |
Back to browse issues page
Ethics code: IR.SBMU.DRC.REC.1399.045
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Jaberi Ansari Z, Valian A, Maghsoudlou nejad M. Effect of Different Repair Protocols on Repair Bond Strength of Aged Composite Restorations. J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci 2025; 10 (4) :262-273
URL: http://jrdms.dentaliau.ac.ir/article-1-745-en.html
URL: http://jrdms.dentaliau.ac.ir/article-1-745-en.html
1- Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
2- Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran. ,maghsoudlou.mahsa@gmail.com
2- Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran. ,
Abstract: (9 Views)
Background and Aim: This study assessed the effects of composite type, adhesive type, adhesive application protocol, and storage time on repair microshear bond strength (µSBS) of composite restorations.
Materials and Methods: This in vitro, experimental study was conducted on Z350 and Point 4 (n=360) composite discs that were stored in water for 3 weeks at 37°C. After roughening by bur and etching, the specimens were divided into 24 groups (n=15) based on the type of composite (Z350 and Point 4), type of universal adhesive (G-Premio Bond and Clearfil Universal Bond Quick), adhesive application protocol (according to the manufacturer’s instructions, waiting for 30 seconds, or diode laser irradiation of adhesive prior to polymerization for 30 seconds), and storage time (24 hours or 1 year). The specimens were bonded to Z250 repair composite, and underwent µSBS test. The mode of failure was also determined. Data were analyzed by four-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (alpha=0.05).
Results: Four-way ANOVA showed significant effects of adhesive application protocol (P=0.000) and storage time (P=0.000) on µSBS. The interaction effect of the two on µSBS was also significant (P=0.046). The µSBS after 24 hours was higher than that after 1 year irrespective of the adhesive application protocol. The µSBS was maximum in the laser group followed by waiting for 30 seconds, and all pairwise comparisons were significant in this respect (P=0.000).
Conclusion: In aged composite restoration repair, diode laser irradiation of adhesive prior to polymerization or waiting for 30 seconds prior to adhesive curing can enhance the µSBS.
Materials and Methods: This in vitro, experimental study was conducted on Z350 and Point 4 (n=360) composite discs that were stored in water for 3 weeks at 37°C. After roughening by bur and etching, the specimens were divided into 24 groups (n=15) based on the type of composite (Z350 and Point 4), type of universal adhesive (G-Premio Bond and Clearfil Universal Bond Quick), adhesive application protocol (according to the manufacturer’s instructions, waiting for 30 seconds, or diode laser irradiation of adhesive prior to polymerization for 30 seconds), and storage time (24 hours or 1 year). The specimens were bonded to Z250 repair composite, and underwent µSBS test. The mode of failure was also determined. Data were analyzed by four-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (alpha=0.05).
Results: Four-way ANOVA showed significant effects of adhesive application protocol (P=0.000) and storage time (P=0.000) on µSBS. The interaction effect of the two on µSBS was also significant (P=0.046). The µSBS after 24 hours was higher than that after 1 year irrespective of the adhesive application protocol. The µSBS was maximum in the laser group followed by waiting for 30 seconds, and all pairwise comparisons were significant in this respect (P=0.000).
Conclusion: In aged composite restoration repair, diode laser irradiation of adhesive prior to polymerization or waiting for 30 seconds prior to adhesive curing can enhance the µSBS.
Type of Study: Original article |
Subject:
Restorative Dentistry
References
1. Michelotti G, Niedzwiecki M, Bidjan D, Dieckmann P, Deari S, Attin T, Tauböck TT. Silane Effect of Universal Adhesive on the Composite-Composite Repair Bond Strength after Different Surface Pretreatments. Polymers (Basel). 2020 Apr 19;12(4):950. [DOI:10.3390/polym12040950] [PMID] []
2. Martos R, Hegedüs V, Szalóki M, Blum IR, Lynch CD, Hegedüs C. A randomised controlled study on the effects of different surface treatments and adhesive self-etch functional monomers on the immediate repair bond strength and integrity of the repaired resin composite interface. J Dent. 2019 Jun;85:57-63. [DOI:10.1016/j.jdent.2019.04.012] [PMID]
3. Baldissera RA, Corrêa MB, Schuch HS, Collares K, Nascimento GG, Jardim PS, Moraes RR, Opdam NJ, Demarco FF. Are there universal restorative composites for anterior and posterior teeth? J Dent. 2013 Nov;41(11):1027-35. [DOI:10.1016/j.jdent.2013.08.016] [PMID]
4. Demarco FF, Collares K, Coelho-de-Souza FH, Correa MB, Cenci MS, Moraes RR, Opdam NJ. Anterior composite restorations: A systematic review on long-term survival and reasons for failure. Dent Mater. 2015 Oct;31(10):1214-24. [DOI:10.1016/j.dental.2015.07.005] [PMID]
5. Flury S, Dulla FA, Peutzfeldt A. Repair bond strength of resin composite to restorative materials after short- and long-term storage. Dent Mater. 2019 Sep;35(9):1205-13. [DOI:10.1016/j.dental.2019.05.008] [PMID]
6. Kanzow P, Wiegand A, Göstemeyer G, Schwendicke F. Understanding the management and teaching of dental restoration repair: Systematic review and meta-analysis of surveys. J Dent. 2018 Feb;69:1-21. [DOI:10.1016/j.jdent.2017.09.010] [PMID]
7. Kanzow P, Wiegand A, Schwendicke F. Cost-effectiveness of repairing versus replacing composite or amalgam restorations. J Dent. 2016 Nov;54:41-7. [DOI:10.1016/j.jdent.2016.08.008] [PMID]
8. Alizadeh Oskoee P, Savadi Oskoee S, Rikhtegaran S, Pournaghi-Azar F, Gholizadeh S, Aleyasin Y, Kasrae S. Effect of Various Laser Surface Treatments on Repair Shear Bond Strength of Aged Silorane-Based Composite. J Lasers Med Sci. 2017 Fall;8(4):186-90. [DOI:10.15171/jlms.2017.34] [PMID] []
9. Cuevas-Suárez CE, Nakanishi L, Isolan CP, Ribeiro JS, Moreira AG, Piva E. Repair bond strength of bulk-fill resin composite: Effect of different adhesive protocols. Dent Mater J. 2020 Mar 31;39(2):236-41. [DOI:10.4012/dmj.2018-291] [PMID]
10. Kiomarsi N, Espahbodi M, Chiniforush N, Karazifard MJ, Kamangar SSH. In vitro evaluation of repair bond strength of composite: Effect of surface treatments with bur and laser and application of universal adhesive. Laser Ther. 2017 Sep 30;26(3):173-80. [DOI:10.5978/islsm.17-OR-12] [PMID] []
11. Shokripor M, Soufi LR, Ahmadi B, Najafrad E, Mosleh MA. Comparison the Effect of Different Surface Treatments on Shear Bond Strength of Repaired Composite. Avicenna J Dent Res. 2019;11(1):30-36. [DOI:10.34172/ajdr.2019.06]
12. Kanzow P, Wiegand A, Schwendicke F, Göstemeyer G. Same, same, but different? A systematic review of protocols for restoration repair. J Dent. 2019 Jul;86:1-16. [DOI:10.1016/j.jdent.2019.05.021] [PMID]
13. Fawzy AS, El-Askary FS, Amer MA. Effect of surface treatments on the tensile bond strength of repaired water-aged anterior restorative micro-fine hybrid resin composite. J Dent. 2008 Dec;36(12):969-76. [DOI:10.1016/j.jdent.2008.07.014] [PMID]
14. Cavalcanti AN, De Lima AF, Peris AR, Mitsui FH, Marchi GM. Effect of surface treatments and bonding agents on the bond strength of repaired composites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2007;19(2):90-8; discussion 99. [DOI:10.1111/j.1708-8240.2007.00073.x] [PMID]
15. Nagarkar S, Theis-Mahon N, Perdigão J. Universal dental adhesives: Current status, laboratory testing, and clinical performance. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2019 Aug;107(6):2121-31. [DOI:10.1002/jbm.b.34305] [PMID]
16. Kuno Y, Hosaka K, Nakajima M, Ikeda M, Klein Junior CA, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Incorporation of a hydrophilic amide monomer into a one-step self-etch adhesive to increase dentin bond strength: Effect of application time. Dent Mater J. 2019 Dec 1;38(6):892-9. [DOI:10.4012/dmj.2018-286] [PMID]
17. Altinci P, Mutluay M, Tezvergil-Mutluay A. Repair bond strength of nanohybrid composite resins with a universal adhesive. Acta Biomater Odontol Scand. 2017 Dec 12;4(1):10-9. [DOI:10.1080/23337931.2017.1412262] [PMID] []
18. Karadas M, Bedir F, Demirbuga S. The role of etching protocols on bond strength of universal adhesives applied to caries affected dentin: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Invest. 2024 Dec;28(12): 683. [DOI:10.1007/s00784-024-06089-0] [PMID]
19. Huang XQ, Pucci CR, Luo T, Breschi L, Pashley DH, Niu LN, Tay FR. No-waiting dentine self-etch concept-Merit or hype. J Dent. 2017 Jul;62:54-63. [DOI:10.1016/j.jdent.2017.05.007] [PMID]
20. Ahmed MH, Yoshihara K, Mercelis B, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B. Quick bonding using a universal adhesive. Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Aug;24(8):2837-51. [DOI:10.1007/s00784-019-03149-8] [PMID]
21. Sarialioglu GA, Aycan UB. Influence of Etching Mode and Composite Type on Bond Strength to Biodentine Using a "No-Wait" Universal Adhesive. Odovtos-Int J Dent Sc. 2022 Sep-Dec;24(3):36-47.
22. Maenosono RM, Bim Júnior O, Duarte MA, Palma-Dibb RG, Wang L, Ishikiriama SK. Diode laser irradiation increases microtensile bond strength of dentin. Braz Oral Res. 2015; 29:1-5. [DOI:10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2015.vol29.0004]
23. Golbari N, Kasraei S, Afrasiabi A, Mostajir E, Mojahedi SM. Effect of Diode Laser (810 nm) Irradiation on Marginal Microleakage of Multi-mode Adhesive Resins in Class V Composite Restorations. J Lasers Med Sci. 2019 Fall;10(4):275-82. [DOI:10.15171/jlms.2019.45] [PMID] []
24. Malekipour M, Alizadeh F, Shirani F, Amini S. The effect of 808 nm diode laser irradiation on shear bond strength of composite bonded to dentin before and after bonding. Journal of Dental Lasers. 2015 Jul;9(2):69. [DOI:10.4103/0976-2868.158465]
25. Li J. Effects of surface properties on bond strength between layers of newly cured dental composites. J Oral Rehabil. 1997 May;24(5):358-60. [DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2842.1997.00508.x] [PMID]
26. Tezvergil A, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. Composite-composite repair bond strength: effect of different adhesion primers. J Dent. 2003 Nov;31(8):521-5. [DOI:10.1016/S0300-5712(03)00093-9] [PMID]
27. Tarumi H, Torii M, Tsuchitani Y. Relationship between particle size of barium glass filler and water sorption of light-cured composite resin. Dent Mater J. 1995 Jun;14(1):37-44. [DOI:10.4012/dmj.14.37] [PMID]
28. Brosh T, Pilo R, Bichacho N, Blutstein R. Effect of combinations of surface treatments and bonding agents on the bond strength of repaired composites. J Prosthet Dent. 1997 Feb;77(2):122-6. [DOI:10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70224-5] [PMID]
29. Tantbirojn D, Fernando C, Versluis A. Failure Strengths of Composite Additions and Repairs. Oper Dent. 2015 Jul-Aug;40(4):364-71. [DOI:10.2341/14-042-L] [PMID]
30. Hooshmand T, van Noort R, Keshvad A. Storage effect of a pre-activated silane on the resin to ceramic bond. Dent Mater. 2004 Sep;20(7):635-42. [DOI:10.1016/j.dental.2003.08.005] [PMID]
31. Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Sonoda A, Maruo Y, Makita Y, Okihara T, Irie M, Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B. Effectiveness and stability of silane coupling agent incorporated in 'universal' adhesives. Dent Mater. 2016 Oct;32(10):1218-25. [DOI:10.1016/j.dental.2016.07.002] [PMID]
32. Altmann S, Pfeiffer J. The hydrolysis/condensation behaviour of methacryloyloxyalkylfunctional alkoxysilanes: structure-reactivity relations. Monatshefte für Chemie/Chemical Monthly. 2003 Aug;134(8):1081-92. [DOI:10.1007/s00706-003-0615-y]
33. Wu, C-Y., Nakamura K, Miyashita-Kobayashi A, Haruyama A, Yokoi Y, Kuroiwa A, Yoshinari N, Kameyama A. The Effect of Additional Silane Pre-Treatment on the Microtensile Bond Strength of Resin-Based Composite Post-andCore Build-Up Material. Appl. Sci. 2024 Jun-Jul;14(15), 6637. [DOI:10.3390/app14156637]
34. Papadogiannis D, Dimitriadi M, Zafiropoulou M, Gaintantzopoulou MD, Eliades G. Universal Adhesives: Setting Characteristics and Reactivity with Dentin. Materials (Basel). 2019 May 27;12(10):1720. [DOI:10.3390/ma12101720] [PMID] []
35. Tsujimoto A, Barkmeier WW, Takamizawa T, Wilwerding TM, Latta MA, Miyazaki M. Interfacial Characteristics and Bond Durability of Universal Adhesive to Various Substrates. Oper Dent. 2017 Mar/Apr;42(2):E59-E70. [DOI:10.2341/15-353-L] [PMID]
36. Brianezzi LFF, Maenosono RM, Bim O Júnior, Zabeu GS, Palma-Dibb RG, Ishikiriama SK. Does laser diode irradiation improve the degree of conversion of simplified dentin bonding systems? J Appl Oral Sci. 2017 Jul-Aug;25(4):381-6. [DOI:10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0461] [PMID] []
37. Bail M, Malacarne-Zanon J, Silva SM, Anauate-Netto A, Nascimento FD, Amore R, Lewgoy H, Pashley DH, Carrilho MR. Effect of air-drying on the solvent evaporation, degree of conversion and water sorption/solubility of dental adhesive models. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2012 Mar;23(3):629-38. [DOI:10.1007/s10856-011-4541-y] [PMID]
38. Cho BH, Dickens SH. Effects of the acetone content of single solution dentin bonding agents on the adhesive layer thickness and the microtensile bond strength. Dent Mater. 2004 Feb;20(2):107-15. [DOI:10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00071-X] [PMID]
39. Batista GR, Barcellos DC, Rocha Gomes Torres C, Damião ÁJ, de Oliveira HP, de Paiva Gonçalves SE. Effect of Nd:YAG laser on the solvent evaporation of adhesive systems. Int J Esthet Dent. 2015 Winter;10(4):598-609.
40. Rezaei-Soufi L, Kasraei S, Fekrazad R, Vahdatinia F, Moghim Beigi A, Haddad M, et al. Evaluation of Diode laser (940 nm) irradiation effect on microleakage in class V composite restoration before and after adhesive application .J Dent Mater Tech. 2018 Jul; 7(1): 11-8.
41. Burrer P, Dang H, Par M, Attin T, Tauböck TT. Effect of Over-Etching and Prolonged Application Time of a Universal Adhesive on Dentin Bond Strength. Polymers (Basel). 2020 Dec 3;12(12):2902. [DOI:10.3390/polym12122902] [PMID] []
42. Ribeiro JC, Gomes PN, Moysés MR, Dias SC, Pereira LJ, Ribeiro JG. Shear strength evaluation of composite-composite resin associations. J Dent. 2008 May;36(5):326-30. [DOI:10.1016/j.jdent.2008.01.015] [PMID]
43. Curtis AR, Shortall AC, Marquis PM, Palin WM. Water uptake and strength characteristics of a nanofilled resin-based composite. J Dent. 2008 Mar;36(3):186-93. [DOI:10.1016/j.jdent.2007.11.015] [PMID]
44. Koç-Vural U, Kerimova L, Baltacioglu İH, Kiremitçi A. Bond strength of dental nanocomposites repaired with a bulkfill composite. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017 Mar 1;9(3):e437-42. [DOI:10.4317/jced.53501] [PMID] []
45. Hanabusa M, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Okihara T, Yamamoto T, Momoi Y, Van Meerbeek B. Interference of functional monomers with polymerization efficiency of adhesives. Eur J Oral Sci. 2016 Apr;124(2):204-9. [DOI:10.1111/eos.12245] [PMID]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |