Volume 6, Issue 3 (6-2021)
J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci 2021, 6(3): 8-18 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Valian A, Maghsoudlou M, Roudbari M. Push-out bond strength of glass fiber posts with two universal adhesives in endodontically-treated teeth. J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci 2021; 6 (3) :8-18
URL: http://jrdms.dentaliau.ac.ir/article-1-318-en.html
URL: http://jrdms.dentaliau.ac.ir/article-1-318-en.html
1- Dept of Restorative dentistry, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of medical Sciences
2- Restorative Department, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran ,maghsoudlou.mahsa@gmail.com
3- Dept. of Restorative dentistry, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of medical Sciences
2- Restorative Department, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran ,
3- Dept. of Restorative dentistry, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of medical Sciences
Abstract: (2010 Views)
Objectives: Attempts are ongoing to simplify the bonding procedure by decreasing the procedural steps. Universal adhesives were introduced to serve this purpose. This study aimed to evaluate the push-out bond strength of glass fiber posts in endodontically-treated teeth with two universal adhesives.
Materials and Methods: In this in vitro, experimental study, 22 single-rooted mandibular premolars were decoronated at their cementoenamel junction, endodontically treated and were randomly divided into two groups. The G-Premio Bond was used in the first and All-Bond Universal was used in the second group, according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Angelus fiber posts were cemented using RelyX U200 Automix self-adhesive resin cement. The roots were cut into 1-mm-thick sections perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the tooth in the cervical, middle, and apical thirds. The push-out test was performed in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min, and bond strength values were recorded. The failure modes were also determined. The data were analyzed using ANOVA and linear mixed models.
Results: The mean push-out bond strength was significantly higher in All Bond Universal than
G-Premio Bond (P=0.036). Also, there were statistically significant differences in the push-out bond strength of adhesives in different parts of the root canal (P=0.039). All failures were type 4 in both groups (adhesive failure between the dentin and resin cement).
Conclusion: All Bond Universal yielded superior push-out bond strength than G-Premio. However, further in vitro and in vivo studies with larger sample size are required for an evidence-based decision making.
Materials and Methods: In this in vitro, experimental study, 22 single-rooted mandibular premolars were decoronated at their cementoenamel junction, endodontically treated and were randomly divided into two groups. The G-Premio Bond was used in the first and All-Bond Universal was used in the second group, according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Angelus fiber posts were cemented using RelyX U200 Automix self-adhesive resin cement. The roots were cut into 1-mm-thick sections perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the tooth in the cervical, middle, and apical thirds. The push-out test was performed in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min, and bond strength values were recorded. The failure modes were also determined. The data were analyzed using ANOVA and linear mixed models.
Results: The mean push-out bond strength was significantly higher in All Bond Universal than
G-Premio Bond (P=0.036). Also, there were statistically significant differences in the push-out bond strength of adhesives in different parts of the root canal (P=0.039). All failures were type 4 in both groups (adhesive failure between the dentin and resin cement).
Conclusion: All Bond Universal yielded superior push-out bond strength than G-Premio. However, further in vitro and in vivo studies with larger sample size are required for an evidence-based decision making.
Keywords: Bond Strength, Endodontically Treated Teeth, glass Fiber Posts, Push-Out Test, Universal Adhesive
Type of Study: Original article |
Subject:
Oral medicine
References
1. Aflaki S, Boyerahmadi E, Talaei A, Safari MR, Mohammadpour M, Mohammadi N, et al. In vitro transportation of curved canals following glide path preparation by Path File and Scout RaCe rotary systems versus manual instrumentation using cone-beam computed tomography. Front Dent 2020 Nov;17:30. [DOI:10.18502/fid.v17i30.4751]
2. Pang J, Feng C, Zhu X, Liu B, Deng T, Gao Y, et al. Fracture behaviors of maxillary central incisors with flared root canals restored with CAD/CAM integrated glass fiber post-and-core. Dent Mater J. 2019 Jan;38(1):114-9. [DOI:10.4012/dmj.2017-394] [PMID]
3. Özcan M, Volpato CAM. Current perspectives on dental adhesion: (3) Adhesion tointraradicular dentin: Concepts and applications. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2020 Sep;(56). [DOI:10.1016/j.jdsr.2020.08.002] [PMID] [PMCID]
4. Guldener KA, Lanzrein CL, Guldener BES, Lang NP, Ramseier CA, Salvi GE. Long-term Clinical Outcomes of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with or without Fiber Postretained Single-unit Restorations. J Endod. 2017 Feb;43(2):188-93. [DOI:10.1016/j.joen.2016.10.008] [PMID]
5. Carvalho RF, Cardenas A, Carvalho CN, de Souza JJ, Bauer J, Siqueira F, et al. Effect of the Photo-initiator System Contained in Universal Adhesives on Radicular Dentin Bonding. Oper Dent. 2020 Sep;45(5):547-55. [DOI:10.2341/19-146-L] [PMID]
6. Miotti LL, Follak AC, Montagner AF, Pozzobon RT, da Silveira BL, Susin AH. Is conventional resin cement adhesive performance to dentin better than self-adhesive? A systematic review and meta-analysis of laboratory studies. Oper Dent. 2020 Sep;45(5):484-95. [DOI:10.2341/19-153-L] [PMID]
7. Perdigao J, Sezinando A, Monteiro P. Evaluation of a new universal adhesive using different bonding strategies. J Dent Res. 2012 Mar 21;91(Special issue A).
8. Mena‐Serrano A, Kose C, De Paula EA, Tay LY, Reis A, Loguercio AD, et al. A new universal simplified adhesive: 6‐month clinical evaluation. J EsthetRestor Dent. 2013 Feb;25(1):55-69. [DOI:10.1111/jerd.12005] [PMID]
9. Muñoz MA, Luque I, Hass V, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Bombarda NH. Immediate bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentine. J Dent. 2013 May;41(5):404-11. [DOI:10.1016/j.jdent.2013.03.001] [PMID]
10. Dhanpal PC, Yiu CK, King NM, Tay FR, Hiraishi N. Effect of temperature on water sorption and solubility of dental adhesive resins. J Dent. 2009 Feb 1;37(2):122-32. [DOI:10.1016/j.jdent.2008.10.004] [PMID]
11. Muñoz MA, Sezinando A, Luque-Martinez I, Szesz AL, Reis A, Loguercio AD, et al. Influence of a hydrophobic resin coating on the bonding efficacy of three universal adhesives. J Dent. 2014 May;42(5):595-602. [DOI:10.1016/j.jdent.2014.01.013] [PMID]
12. Häfer M, Schneider H, Rupf S, Busch I, Fuchß A, Merte I, et al. Experimental and clinical evaluation of a self-etching and an etch-and-rinse adhesive system. J Adhes Dent. 2013 May;15(3):275-86.
13. De Munck JD, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, et al. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res. 2005 Feb;84(2):118-32. [DOI:10.1177/154405910508400204] [PMID]
14. McDonough WG, Antonucci JM, He J, Shimada Y, Chiang MY, Schumacher GE, et al. A microshear test to measure bond strengths of dentin-polymer interfaces. Biomaterials. 2002 Sep;23(17):3603-8. [DOI:10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00089-3]
15. Hardan L, Bourgi R, Kharouf N, Mancino D,Zarow M, Jakubowicz N, et al. Bond strength of universal adhesives to dentin: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Polymers. 2021;13(5). [DOI:10.3390/polym13050814] [PMID] [PMCID]
16. Ebrahimi SF, Shadman N, Nasery EB, Sadeghian F. Effect of polymerization mode of two adhesive systems on push-out bond strength of fiber post to different regions of root canal dentin. Dent Res J. 2014 Jan;11(1):32.
17. Forghani M, Afshari E, Parisay I, Garajian R. Effect of a passive sonic irrigation system on elimination of Enterococcus faecalis from root canal systems of primary teeth, using different concentrations of sodium hypochlorite: An in vitro evaluation. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospect. 2017;11(3):177-82. [DOI:10.15171/joddd.2017.032] [PMID] [PMCID]
18. Portigliatti RP, Tumini JL, Bertoldi Hepburn AD, Aromando RF, Olmos JL. Correspondence between fiber post and drill dimensions for post canal preparation. Am J Dent. 2017 Dec;30(6):295-8.
19. Shafiei F, Mohammadparast P, Jowkar Z. Adhesion performance of a universal adhesive in the root canal: Effect of etch-and-rinse vs. self-etch mode. PloS one. 2018 Apr;13(4):e0195367. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0195367] [PMID] [PMCID]
20. Poggio C, Beltrami R, Colombo M, Chiesa M, Scribante A. Influence of dentin pretreatment on bond strength of universal adhesives. ActaBiomater. Odontol. Scand. 2017 Jan;3(1):30-5. [DOI:10.1080/23337931.2017.1305273] [PMID] [PMCID]
21. Boing TF, Gomes GM, Gomes JC, Reis A, Gomes OM. Is the bonding of self-adhesive cement sensitive to root region and curing mode? Journal of applied oral science :revista FOB. 2017 Feb;25(1):2-9. [DOI:10.1590/1678-77572015-0430] [PMID] [PMCID]
22. Durski MT, Metz MJ, Thompson JY, Mascarenhas AK, Crim GA, Vieira S, et al. Push-out bond strength evaluation of glass fiber posts with different resin cements and application techniques. Oper Dent. 2016 Jan;41(1):103-10. [DOI:10.2341/14-343-L] [PMID]
23. Foxton RM, Nakajima M, Tagami J, Miura H. Adhesion to root canal dentine using one and two‐step adhesives with dual‐cure composite core materials. J Oral Rehabil. 2005 Feb;32(2):97-104. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01404.x] [PMID]
24. Mallmann A, Jacques LB, Valandro LF, Mathias P, Muench A. Microtensile bond strength of light-and self-cured adhesive systems to intraradicular dentin using a translucent fiber post. Oper Dent. 2005 Jul;30(4):500-6.
25. Marchesi G, Frassetto A, Mazzoni A, Apolonio F, Diolosa M, Cadenaro M, et al. Adhesive performance of a multi-mode adhesive system: 1-year in vitro study. J Dent. 2014 May;42(5):603-12. [DOI:10.1016/j.jdent.2013.12.008] [PMID]
26. Zicari F, Couthino E, De Munck J, Poitevin A, Scotti R, Naert I, et al. Bonding effectiveness and sealing ability of fiber-post bonding. Dent Mater. 2008 Jul;24(7):967-77. [DOI:10.1016/j.dental.2007.11.011] [PMID]
27. Potesta FL, Broome JC, O'Neal SJ, Givan DA, Ramp LC. The effect of etching technique on the retention of adhesively cemented prefabricated dowels. J Prosthodont. 2008 Aug;17(6):445-50. [DOI:10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00333.x] [PMID]
28. Grandini S, Sapio S, Goracci C, Monticelli F, Ferrari M. A one step procedure for luting glass fibre posts: an SEM evaluation. IntEndod J. 2004 Oct;37(10):679-86. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00850.x] [PMID]
29. Goracci C, Sadek FT, Fabianelli A, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Evaluation of the adhesion of fiber posts to intraradicular dentin. Oper Dent. 2005 Sep;30(5):627-35.
30. Valandro LF, Valera MC, de Araujo MA. The effect of adhesive systems on the pullout strength of a fiberglass-reinforced composite post system in bovine teeth. J Adhes Dent. 2005 Dec;7(4).
31. Sofan E, Sofan A, Palaia G, Tenore G, Romeo U, Migliau G. Classification review of dental adhesive systems: from the IV generation to the universal type. Annali di stomatologia. 2017 Jan;8(1):1-17. [DOI:10.11138/ads/2017.8.1.001] [PMID] [PMCID]
32. Eid BM, Waly AS, Princy P, Venkatesan R. scanning electron microscope Evaluation of dentinal tubules penetration of three different root Canal Sealers. EC Dent Sci. 2019;18:1121-7.
33. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Grandini S, Goracci C. Efficacy of a self-curing adhesive--resin cement system on luting glass-fiber posts into root canals: An SEM investigation. Int J Prosthodont. 2001 Nov;14(6).
34. Gaston BA, West LA, LiewehrFR, Fernandes C, Pashley DH. Evaluation of regional bond strength of resin cement to endodontic surfaces. J Endod. 2001 May;27(5):321-4. [DOI:10.1097/00004770-200105000-00001] [PMID]
35. Noirrit EE, Grégoire G, Cournot M. Morphological study of fiber-reinforced post- bonding system-root dentin interface by evaluation of two bonding systems. J Dent. 2008 Mar;36(3):204-13. [DOI:10.1016/j.jdent.2007.12.003] [PMID]
36. Muniz L, Mathias P. The influence of sodium hypochlorite and root canal sealers on post retention in different dentin regions. Oper Dent. 2005 Jul;30(4):533.
37. Pereira JR, Pamato S, Santini MF, Porto VC, Ricci WA, So MVcR. Push-out bond strength of fiberglass posts cemented with adhesive and self-adhesive resin cements according to the root canal surface. Saudi Dent J. 2019 Nov;33:22-6. [DOI:10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.11.009] [PMID] [PMCID]
38. Aksornmuang J, Nakajima M, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Effect of prolonged photo-irradiation time of three self-etch systems on the bonding to root canal dentine. J Dent. 2006 Jul;34(6):389-97. [DOI:10.1016/j.jdent.2005.09.001] [PMID]
39. Akgungor G, Akkayan B. Influence of dentin bonding agents and polymerization modes on the bond strength between translucent fiber posts and three dentin regions within a post space. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2006 May;95(5):368-78. [DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.02.027] [PMID]
40. Foxton RM, Nakajima M, Tagami J, Miura H. Bonding of photo and dual-cure adhesives to root canal dentin. Oper Dent. 2003 Sep;28(5):543-51.
41. D'Arcangelo C, D'Amario M, Vadini M, Zazzeroni S, De Angelis F, Caputi S. An evaluation of luting agent application technique effect on fibre post retention. J Dent. 2008 Apr;36(4):235- [DOI:10.1016/j.jdent.2008.01.004] [PMID]
42. D'arcangelo C, Zazzeroni S, D'Amario M, Vadini M, De Angelis F, Trubiani O, et al. Bond strengths of three types of fibre‐reinforced post systems in various regions of root canals. Int Endod J. 2008 Apr;41(4):322-8. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01367.x] [PMID]
43. Kececi AD, Kaya BU, Adanir N. Micro push-out bond strengths of four fiber-reinforced composite post systems and 2 luting materials. Oral Surg, Oral Med, Oral Pathol, Oral Radiol, Endod. 2008 Jan;105(1):121-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.07.011] [PMID]
44. Cencer M, Liu Y, Winter A, Murley M, Meng H, Lee BP. Effect of pH on the rate of curing and bioadhesive properties of dopamine functionalized poly (ethylene glycol) hydrogels. Biomacromolecules. 2014 Jul;15(8):2861-9. [DOI:10.1021/bm500701u] [PMID] [PMCID]
45. Franco EB, Lopes LG, D'alpino PH, Pereira JC. Influence of pH of different adhesive systems on the polymerization of a chemically cured composite resin. Brazilian Dent J. 2005 Aug;16(2):107-11. [DOI:10.1590/S0103-64402005000200004] [PMID]
46. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching systems: I: Depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers. Dent Mater. 2001 Jul;17(4):296-308. [DOI:10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00087-7]
47. da Rosa WL, Piva E, da Silva AF. Bond strength of universal adhesives: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2015 Jul;43(7):765-76. [DOI:10.1016/j.jdent.2015.04.003] [PMID]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
