Volume 6, Issue 3 (6-2021)                   J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci 2021, 6(3): 31-39 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Aminian A, Tavakolinejad Z, Ebrahimnejad H, Azami N. Alignment Efficiency of Open-Coil Spring Versus Conventional Technique in Relieving Anterior Crowding: A Single-Center Randomized Clinical Trial. J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci 2021; 6 (3) :31-39
URL: http://jrdms.dentaliau.ac.ir/article-1-308-en.html
1- Department of Orthodontics, Kerman Dental School, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
2- Department of Orthodontics, Rafsanjan Dental School, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran , Ortho.2017@yahoo.com
3- Oral and Dental Diseases Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
4- Private practice, Houston ,TX
Abstract:   (1686 Views)

Background and Aim: This study compares a new technique for teeth alignment to the conventional method. The teeth were aligned using an open-coil spring, i.e. simultaneous space opening and alignment, on round nickel-titanium (NiTi) archwires. The purpose of this 2-arm parallel trial (1:1 allocation ratio) was to evaluate the alignment efficiency of conventional and open-coil spring techniques in anterior crowding treatment.
Materials and Methods: In this clinical trial study, sixty-two non-extraction patients (70 dental arches: 24 upper arches and 46 lower arches) with ≥3mm of Little’s Irregularity Index (LII) were recruited in two groups based on the minimization method. Blinding was applicable for outcome assessment only. In one group, the teeth were aligned using an open-coil spring, whereas the alignment in the other group was done conventionally, (space opening on steel wires followed by alignment with an auxiliary NiTi wire). The alignment duration was the primary outcome that was investigated for survival analysis and alignment rate ratios, and levels of crowding were calculated with Cox proportional hazard regression. The pre- and post-treatment intercanine widths were also recorded as the secondary outcome. The chi-square and t-test were used to compare other variables between the groups. The level of statistical significance was set at P<0.05.
Results: There was no significant difference in the alignment duration between the conventional (185.48±74.82 days) and open-coil (179.19±64.15 days) groups (P=0.725). No harm was detected using the mentioned methods.
Conclusion: The use of open-coil spring over brackets on NiTi or steel wires does not seem to affect anterior crowding treatment time.

Full-Text [PDF 440 kb]   (803 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (798 Views)  

1. Lo Giudice A, Isola G, Rustico L, Ronsivalle V, Portelli M, Nucera R. The Efficacy of Retention Appliances after Fixed Orthodontic Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. ‎Appl Sci. 2020;10(9):3107. [DOI:10.3390/app10093107]
2. Chow L, Goonewardene MS, Cook R, Firth MJ. Adult orthodontic retreatment: A survey of patient profiles and original treatment failings. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020; 158(3):371-382. [DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.09.010]
3. Malek NH, Hasan H, Dasor MM. Partial least squares (pls) latent variable modelling approach for measuring duration of orthodontic treatment. Malays J Comput Sci. 2020;5(1):469-79. [DOI:10.24191/mjoc.v5i1.7416]
4. Yadav S, Markiewicz MR, Allareddy V. Dentoalveolar Distraction Osteogenesis for Rapid Maxillary Canine Retraction: An Overview of Technique, Treatment, and Outcomes. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin. 2020;1;32(1):83-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.coms.2019.09.005]
5. Scott P, DiBiase AT, Sherriff M, Cobourne MT. Alignment efficiency of Damon3 self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;134(4):470.e1-8.
6. Bernabé E, Flores-Mir C. Estimating arch length discrepancy through Little's Irregularity Index for epidemiological use. Eur J Orthod. 2006;28:269-73. [DOI:10.1093/ejo/cji112]
7. Eslambolchi S, Woodside DG, Rossouw PE. A descriptive study of mandibular incisor alignment in untreated subjects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;133:343-53. [DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.04.038]
8. Fleming PS, DiBiase AT, Sarri G, Lee RT. Comparison of mandibular arch changes during alignment and leveling with 2 preadjusted edgewise appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136:340-7. [DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.08.030]
9. Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary orthodontics. 5th ed. Missouri: Mosby; 2013.
10. Brauchli LM, Senn C, Ball J, Wichelhaus A. Force levels of 23 nickel-titanium open-coil springs in compression testing. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;139:601-5. [DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.06.033]
11. Harradine N. Self-ligating brackets: theory, practice, and evidence. In: Graber LW, Vanarsdall RL, Vig KWL. Orthodontics: current principles & techniques. 5th ed. Missouri: Mosby, 2012:607-11.
12. Bourke A, Daskalogiannakis J, Tompson B, Watson P. Force characteristics of nickel-titanium open-coil springs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Aug 1;138(2):142-e1. [DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.01.026]
13. Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gøtzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, et al. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;340:c869. [DOI:10.1136/bmj.c869]
14. Sebastian B. Alignment efficiency of superelastic coaxial nickel-titanium vs superelastic single-stranded nickel-titanium in relieving mandibular anterior crowding: A randomized controlled prospective study. Angle Orthod. 2012;82:703-8. [DOI:10.2319/072111-460.1]
15. Pandis N, Polychronopoulou A, Katsaros C, Eliades T. Comparative assessment of conventional and self-ligating appliances on the effect of mandibular intermolar distance in adolescent nonextraction patients: a single-center randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;140:e99-e105. [DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.03.019]
16. Sandhu SS, Sandhu J. A randomized clinical trial investigating pain associated with superelastic nickel-titanium and multistranded stainless steel archwires during the initial leveling and aligning phase of orthodontic treatment. J Orthod. 2013;40:276-85. [DOI:10.1179/1465313313Y.0000000072]
17. Pandis N, Polychronopoulou A, Eliades T. Active or passive self-ligating brackets? A randomized controlled trial of comparative efficiency in resolving maxillary anterior crowding in adolescents. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137:12.e1-6. [DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.08.019]
18. Ong E, Ho C, Miles P. Alignment efficiency and discomfort of three orthodontic archwire sequences: a randomized clinical trial. J Orthod. 2011;38:32-9. [DOI:10.1179/14653121141218]
19. Wahab RM, Idris H, Yacob H, Ariffin SH. Comparison of self- and conventional-ligating brackets in the alignment stage. Eur J Orthod. 2012;34:176-81. [DOI:10.1093/ejo/cjq179]
20. Little RM. The irregularity index: a quantitative score of mandibular anterior alignment. Am J Orthod. 1975;68:554-63. [DOI:10.1016/0002-9416(75)90086-X]
21. Quaglio CL, Freitas KM, Freitas MR, Janson G, Henriques JF. Stability of maxillary anterior crowding treatment. Dental Press J Orthod. 2012;17:57-64. [DOI:10.1590/S2176-94512012000400014]
22. Destang DL, Kerr WJ. Maxillary retention: is longer better? Eur J Orthod. 2003;25:65-9. [DOI:10.1093/ejo/25.1.65]
23. Bourke A, Daskalogiannakis J, Tompson B, Watson P. Force characteristics of nickel-titanium open-coil springs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;138:142.e1-7. [DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.01.026]
24. Steinbach G, Armstrong D, Kharbanda OP, Petocz P, Darendeliler MA. An investigation of the forces used by clinicians to open spaces with coil springs. Aust Orthod. J 2006;22:115-20.
25. West AE, Jones ML, Newcombe RG. Multiflex versus superelastic: a randomized clinical trial of the tooth alignment ability of initial arch wires. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;108:464-71. [DOI:10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70046-3]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2023 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Research in Dental and Maxillofacial Sciences

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb