Volume 5, Issue 4 (11-2020)
J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci 2020, 5(4): 1-6 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Jalalian E, Shiari S, Jalalian S, Mirzakhani M. A Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Creation Ceramic Veneer to Metal and Zirconia Cores. J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci 2020; 5 (4) :1-6
URL: http://jrdms.dentaliau.ac.ir/article-1-282-en.html
URL: http://jrdms.dentaliau.ac.ir/article-1-282-en.html
1- Associate professor , Prosthodontics Dept , Member of Implant Research Center , Faculty of Dentistry , Tehran Medical Science , Islamic Azad University , Tehran , Iran
2- Dentist
3- Assistant Professor , Restorative Dept, Faculty of Dentistry , Member of Dental Material Research Center , Tehran Medical Science , Islamic Azad University , Tehran , Iran ,Shahriar.Jalalian@yahoo.com
4- Specialist in Restorative Dentistry , Tehran , Iran
2- Dentist
3- Assistant Professor , Restorative Dept, Faculty of Dentistry , Member of Dental Material Research Center , Tehran Medical Science , Islamic Azad University , Tehran , Iran ,
4- Specialist in Restorative Dentistry , Tehran , Iran
Abstract: (2961 Views)
Background and Aim: High chipping rates of the veneering porcelain of zirconia ceramic restorations have been reported in clinical studies. Thus, the shear bond strength (SBS) between the zirconia core and veneering porcelain requires investigation.
Materials and Methods: In this in-vitro study, at first, using a computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) machine, 16 zirconia cores of Kerox were provided. Using the casting method, 16 base metal cores were provided. All the cores were veneered with the Creation ceramic veneer. Afterwards, the samples were put under a static force in the universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/minute until fracture. T-test was used to analyze the data.
Results: The mean SBS for the base metal and zirconia groups was 27±7.43 and 27.75±8.75 Megapascal (MPa), respectively (P=0.812).
Conclusion: There was no significant difference between the metal-ceramic and zirconia ceramic groups in SBS so that the Creation ceramic veneer may solve the problems related to the bond of all-ceramics to ceramic veneers.
Materials and Methods: In this in-vitro study, at first, using a computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) machine, 16 zirconia cores of Kerox were provided. Using the casting method, 16 base metal cores were provided. All the cores were veneered with the Creation ceramic veneer. Afterwards, the samples were put under a static force in the universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/minute until fracture. T-test was used to analyze the data.
Results: The mean SBS for the base metal and zirconia groups was 27±7.43 and 27.75±8.75 Megapascal (MPa), respectively (P=0.812).
Conclusion: There was no significant difference between the metal-ceramic and zirconia ceramic groups in SBS so that the Creation ceramic veneer may solve the problems related to the bond of all-ceramics to ceramic veneers.
Type of Study: Original article |
Subject:
Oral medicine
References
1. Behr M, Zeman F, Baitinger T, Galler J, Koller M, Handel G, Rosentritt M. The clinical performance of porcelain-fused-to-metal precious alloy single crowns: chipping, recurrent caries, periodontitis, and loss of retention. Int J Prosthodont. 2014 Mar-Apr;27(2):153-60. [DOI:10.11607/ijp.3440] [PMID]
2. Reitemeier B, Hänsel K, Kastner C, Weber A, Walter MH. A prospective 10-year study of metal ceramic single crowns and fixed dental prosthesis retainers in private practice settings. J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Mar;109(3):149-55. [DOI:10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60034-7]
3. Sundh A, Molin M, Sjögren G. Fracture resistance of yttrium oxide partially-stabilized zirconia all-ceramic bridges after veneering and mechanical fatigue testing. Dent Mater. 2005 May;21(5):476-82. [DOI:10.1016/j.dental.2004.07.013] [PMID]
4. Roediger M, Gersdorff N, Huels A, Rinke S. Prospective evaluation of zirconia posterior fixed partial dentures: four-year clinical results. Int J Prosthodont. 2010 Mar-Apr;23(2):141-8.
5. Tinschert J, Natt G, Hassenpflug S, Spiekermann H. Status of current CAD/CAM technology in dental medicine. Int J Comput Dent. 2004 Jan;7(1):25-45.
6. Filser F, Kocher P, Weibel F, Lüthy H, Schärer P, Gauckler LJ. Reliability and strength of all-ceramic dental restorations fabricated by direct ceramic machining (DCM). Int J Comput Dent. 2001 Apr;4(2):89-106.
7. Christel P, Meunier A, Heller M, Torre JP, Peille CN. Mechanical properties and short-term in-vivo evaluation of yttrium-oxide-partially-stabilized zirconia. J Biomed Mater Res. 1989 Jan;23(1):45-61. [DOI:10.1002/jbm.820230105] [PMID]
8. Aboushelib MN, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations. Part II: Zirconia veneering ceramics. Dent Mater. 2006 Sep;22(9):857-63. [DOI:10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.014] [PMID]
9. Anusavice KJ. Phillips' Science of Dental Material. 11th ed. St. Louis (MO): Elsevier; 2003. 832 p.
10. Sax C, Hämmerle CH, Sailer I. 10-year clinical outcomes of fixed dental prostheses with zirconia frameworks. Int J Comput Dent. 2011;14(3):183-202.
11. Schmitter M, Mussotter K, Rammelsberg P, Gabbert O, Ohlmann B. Clinical performance of long-span zirconia frameworks for fixed dental prostheses: 5-year results. J Oral Rehabil. 2012;39:552-7. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2842.2012.02311.x] [PMID]
12. Sailer I, Fehér A, Filser F, Gauckler LJ, Lüthy H, Hämmerle CH. Five-year clinical results of zirconia frameworks for posterior fixed partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont. 2007 Jul-Aug;20(4):383-8.
13. Tinschert J, Schulze KA, Natt G, Latzke P, Heussen N, Spiekermann H. Clinical behavior of zirconia-based fixed partial dentures made of DC-Zirkon: 3-year results. Int J Prosthodont. 2008 May-Jun;21(3):217-22.
14. Molin MK, Karlsson SL. Five-year clinical prospective evaluation of zirconia-based Denzir 3-unit FPDs. Int J Prosthodont. 2008 May-Jun;21(3):223-7.
15. Edelhoff D, Florian B, Florian W, Johnen C. HIP zirconia fixed partial dentures--clinical results after 3 years of clinical service. Quintessence Int. 2008 Jun;39(6):459-71.
16. Walter M, Reppel PD, Böning K, Freesmeyer WB. Six-year follow-up of titanium and high-gold porcelain-fused-to-metal fixed partial dentures. J Oral Rehabil. 1999 Feb;26(2):91-6. [DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00373.x] [PMID]
17. Valderhaug J. A 15-year clinical evaluation of fixed prosthodontics. Acta Odontol Scand. 1991 Feb;49(1):35-40. [DOI:10.3109/00016359109041138] [PMID]
18. Manicone PF, Rossi Iommetti P, Raffaelli L. An overview of zirconia ceramics: basic properties and clinical applications. J Dent. 2007 Nov;35(11):819-26. [DOI:10.1016/j.jdent.2007.07.008] [PMID]
19. de Melo RM, Travassos AC, Neisser MP. Shear bond strengths of a ceramic system to alternative metal alloys. J Prosthet Dent. 2005 Jan;93(1):64-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.10.017] [PMID]
20. Jörn D, Waddell JN, Swain MV. The influence of opaque application methods on the bond strength and final shade of PFM restorations. J Dent. 2010;38 Suppl 2:e143-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.jdent.2010.08.016] [PMID]
21. Vasquez VZ, Ozcan M, Kimpara ET. Evaluation of interface characterization and adhesion of glass ceramics to commercially pure titanium and gold alloy after thermal and mechanical loading. Dent Mater. 2009;25:221-31. [DOI:10.1016/j.dental.2008.07.002] [PMID]
22. Barghi N, Lorenzana RE. Optimum thickness of opaque and body porcelain. J Prosthet Dent. 1982 Oct;48(4):429-31. [DOI:10.1016/0022-3913(82)90080-4]
23. Saito A, Komine F, Blatz MB, Matsumura H. A comparison of bond strength of layered veneering porcelains to zirconia and metal. J Prosthet Dent. 2010 Oct;104(4):247-57. [DOI:10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60133-3]
24. Choi BK, Han JS, Yang JH, Lee JB, Kim SH. Shear bond strength of veneering porcelain to zirconia and metal cores. J Adv Prosthodont. 2009 Nov;1(3):129-35. [DOI:10.4047/jap.2009.1.3.129] [PMID] [PMCID]
25. Ahmadzadeh A, Jafari E. A Comparison of the Shear Bond Strength between Two Zirconia Cores on Two Porcelains Proposed by the Manufacturing Company in Two Systems of VITA and IVOCLAR. J Mash Dent Sch. 2013;37(3):185-94.
26. Ozkurt Z, Kazazoglu E, Unal A. In vitro evaluation of shear bond strength of veneering ceramics to zirconia. Dent Mater J. 2010 Mar;29(2):138-46. [DOI:10.4012/dmj.2009-065] [PMID]
27. Abrisham SM, Fallah Tafti A, Kheirkhah S, Tavakkoli MA. Shear Bond Strength of Porcelain to a Base-Metal Compared to Zirconia Core. J Dent Biomater. 2017 Mar;4(1):367-372.
28. Quinn JB, Sundar V, Parry EE, Quinn GD. Comparison of edge chipping resistance of PFM and veneered zirconia specimens. Dent Mater. 2010 Jan;26(1):13-20. [DOI:10.1016/j.dental.2009.08.005] [PMID] [PMCID]
29. Yi YA, Ahn JS, Park YJ, Jun SH, Lee IB, Cho BH, Son HH, Seo DG. The effect of sandblasting and different primers on shear bond strength between yttria-tetragonal zirconia polycrystal ceramic and a self-adhesive resin cement. Oper Dent. 2015 Jan-Feb;40(1):63-71. [DOI:10.2341/13-149-L] [PMID]
30. Aboushelib MN, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Effect of zirconia type on its bond strength with different veneer ceramics. J Prosthodont. 2008 Jul;17(5):401-8. [DOI:10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00306.x] [PMID]
31. Gokce S, Celik-Bagci E, Turkyilmaz I. A comparative in vitro study of the load at fracture of all-ceramic crowns with various thicknesses of In-Ceram core. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2008 May 1;9(4):17-25. [DOI:10.5005/jcdp-9-4-17] [PMID]
32. Benetti P, Pelogia F, Valandro LF, Bottino MA, Bona AD. The effect of porcelain thickness and surface liner application on the fracture behavior of a ceramic system. Dent Mater. 2011 Sep;27(9):948-53. [DOI:10.1016/j.dental.2011.05.009] [PMID]
33. ISO 9693 Metal-ceramic bond characterization (Schwickerath crack initiation test)Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization; 1999.
34. Dündar M, Ozcan M, Cömlekoglu E, Güngör MA, Artunç C. Bond strengths of veneering ceramics to reinforced ceramic core materials. Int J Prosthodont. 2005 Jan-Feb;18(1):71-2.
35. Al-Dohan HM, Yaman P, Dennison JB, Razzoog ME, Lang BR. Shear strength of core-veneer interface in bi-layered ceramics. J Prosthet Dent. 2004 Apr;91(4):349-55. [DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.02.009] [PMID]
36. Guazzato M, Albakry M, Ringer SP, Swain MV. Strength, fracture toughness and microstructure of a selection of all-ceramic materials. Part II. Zirconia-based dental ceramics. Dent Mater. 2004 Jun;20(5):449-56. [DOI:10.1016/j.dental.2003.05.002] [PMID]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
