Volume 4, Issue 3 (9-2019)
J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci 2019, 4(3): 30-35 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Mahdisiar F, Nemati Anaraki S, Bineshian M, Tabatabaei F. Evaluation of the Prevalence of Dentin Hypersensitivity and Associated Factors: A Cross-Sectional Study. J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci 2019; 4 (3) :30-35
URL: http://jrdms.dentaliau.ac.ir/article-1-260-en.html
URL: http://jrdms.dentaliau.ac.ir/article-1-260-en.html
1- Assistant professor, Department of Restorative and Cosmetic Dentistry , Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2- Dentist
3- Assistant professor, Department of Restorative and Cosmetic Dentistry ,Semnan University of medical sciences, Semnan, Iran ,farnaztabatabaei96@gmail.com
2- Dentist
3- Assistant professor, Department of Restorative and Cosmetic Dentistry ,Semnan University of medical sciences, Semnan, Iran ,
Abstract: (3347 Views)
Background and Aim: Dentin hypersensitivity (DH) is one of the most common problems in dentistry. Several factors affect DH. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of this problem and identify the associated factors.
Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 300 patients who referred to the operative dentistry department of Islamic Azad University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, were examined. Demographic information and other related factors were recorded using a questionnaire. One examiner then examined the subjects regarding the potential related clinical factors. DH was evaluated using evaporative and tactile tests and was categorized using the visual analog scale (VAS). Descriptive data were presented as frequency and mean. Chi-Square test was used to examine the related factors at the significance level of 0.05.
Results: The overall prevalence of DH was 21%. The correlation of horizontal brushing technique (P<0.005), hard toothbrushes (P<0.0001), gingival recession (P<0.0001), history of gingival surgery (P<0.001), tooth wear (P<0.001), traumatic occlusion (P<0.005), and bleaching toothpastes (P<0.005) with DH prevalence was significant.
Conclusion: According to the results, high awareness about DH and its associated factors is mandatory.
Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 300 patients who referred to the operative dentistry department of Islamic Azad University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, were examined. Demographic information and other related factors were recorded using a questionnaire. One examiner then examined the subjects regarding the potential related clinical factors. DH was evaluated using evaporative and tactile tests and was categorized using the visual analog scale (VAS). Descriptive data were presented as frequency and mean. Chi-Square test was used to examine the related factors at the significance level of 0.05.
Results: The overall prevalence of DH was 21%. The correlation of horizontal brushing technique (P<0.005), hard toothbrushes (P<0.0001), gingival recession (P<0.0001), history of gingival surgery (P<0.001), tooth wear (P<0.001), traumatic occlusion (P<0.005), and bleaching toothpastes (P<0.005) with DH prevalence was significant.
Conclusion: According to the results, high awareness about DH and its associated factors is mandatory.
Type of Study: Original article |
Subject:
Oral pathology
References
1. 1. 1. West NX, Lussi A, Seong J, Hellwig E. Dentin hypersensitivity: pain mechanisms and aetiology of exposed cervical dentin. Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Mar;17 Suppl 1:S9-19. [DOI:10.1007/s00784-012-0887-x] [PMID] [PMCID]
2. Toledano-Osorio M, Osorio E, Aguilera FS, Luis Medina-Castillo A, Toledano M, Osorio R. Improved reactive nanoparticles to treat dentin hypersensitivity. Acta Biomater. 2018 May;72:371-80. [DOI:10.1016/j.actbio.2018.03.033] [PMID]
3. Yoshizaki KT, Francisconi-Dos-Rios LF, Sobral MA, Aranha AC, Mendes FM, Scaramucci T. Clinical features and factors associated with non-carious cervical lesions and dentin hypersensitivity. J Oral Rehabil. 2017 Feb;44(2):112-8. [DOI:10.1111/joor.12469] [PMID]
4. West NX. Dentine hypersensitivity. Monogr Oral Sci. 2006;20:173-89. [DOI:10.1159/000093362] [PMID]
5. Marto CM, Baptista PA, Nunes T, Pimenta M, Abrantes AM, Pires AS, et al. Evaluation of the efficacy of dentin hypersensitivity treatments - a systematic review and follow-up analysis. J Oral Rehabil. 2019 Oct;46(10):952-90. [DOI:10.1111/joor.12842] [PMID]
6. Favaro Zeola L, Soares PV, Cunha-Cruz J. Prevalence of dentin hypersensitivity: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2019 Feb;81:1-6. [DOI:10.1016/j.jdent.2018.12.015] [PMID]
7. Silva MS, Lima ANAN, Pereira MMA, Ferraz Mendes R, Prado Júnior RR. Prevalence and predictive factors of dentin hypersensitivity in Brazilian adolescents. J Clin Periodontol. 2019 Apr;46(4):448-56. [DOI:10.1111/jcpe.13097] [PMID]
8. Ramlogan S, Raman V, Rees JS, Legall G. A cross-sectional study of dentine sensitivity in periodontitis patients in Trinidad and Tobago. Int J Dent Hyg. 2017 Nov;15(4):e69-e77. [DOI:10.1111/idh.12202] [PMID]
9. Haneet RK, Vandana LK. Prevalence of dentinal hypersensitivity and study of associated factors: a cross-sectional study based on the general dental population of Davangere, Karnataka, India. Int Dent J. 2016 Feb;66(1):49-57. [DOI:10.1111/idj.12206] [PMID]
10. West NX, Sanz M, Lussi A, Bartlett D, Bouchard P, Bourgeois D. Prevalence of dentine hypersensitivity and study of associated factors: a European population-based cross-sectional study. J Dent. 2013 Oct;41(10):841-51. [DOI:10.1016/j.jdent.2013.07.017] [PMID]
11. Bartold PM. Dentinal hypersensitivity: a review. Aust Dent J. 2006 Sep;51(3):212-8; quiz 276. [DOI:10.1111/j.1834-7819.2006.tb00431.x] [PMID]
12. Jensen MP, Chen C, Brugger AM. Interpretation of visual analog scale ratings and change scores: a reanalysis of two clinical trials of postoperative pain J Pain. 2003 Sep;4(7):407-14. [DOI:10.1016/S1526-5900(03)00716-8]
13. Liang X, Wei Z, Hu D, Ruan J. Prevalence of dentin hypersensitivity among the residents of Xi'an city, China. Acta Odontol Scand. 2017 Aug;75(6):387-93. [DOI:10.1080/00016357.2017.1323348] [PMID]
14. Alcântara PM, Barroso NFF, Botelho AM, Douglas-de-Oliveira DW, Gonçalves PF, Flecha OD. Associated factors to cervical dentin hypersensitivity in adults: a transversal study. BMC Oral Health. 2018 Sep 3;18(1):155. [DOI:10.1186/s12903-018-0616-1] [PMID] [PMCID]
15. Barroso NFF, Alcântara PM, Botelho AM, Douglas-de-Oliveira DW, Gonçalves PF, Flecha OD. Prevalence of self-reported versus diagnosed dentinal hypersensitivity: a cross-sectional study and ROC curve analysis. Acta Odontol Scand. 2019 Apr;77(3):219-23. [DOI:10.1080/00016357.2018.1536804] [PMID]
16. Orchardson R, Gillam DG. Managing dentin hypersensitivity. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006 Jul;137(7):990-8; quiz 1028-9. [DOI:10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0321] [PMID]
17. Dhaliwal JS, Palwankar P, Khinda PK, Sodhi SK. Prevalence of dentine hypersensitivity: A cross-sectional study in rural Punjabi Indians. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2012 Jul-Sep;16(3):426-9. [DOI:10.4103/0972-124X.100924] [PMID] [PMCID]
18. Babu B, Hegde MN, Shetty A, Yelapure M. Prevalence of Dentinal Hypersensitivity in Southwest Coastal Population of India. J Dent Sci. 2016;120:80-100.
19. Cunha-Cruz J, Wataha JC, Heaton LJ, Rothen M, Sobieraj M, Scott J, et al. The prevalence of dentin hypersensitivity in general dental practices in the northwest United States. J Am Dent Assoc. 2013 Mar;144(3):288-96. [DOI:10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0116] [PMID]
20. Rees JS. The prevalence of dentine hypersensitivity in general dental practice in the UK. J Clin Periodontol. 2000 Nov;27(11):860-5. [DOI:10.1034/j.1600-051x.2000.027011860.x] [PMID]
21. Sood S, Nagpal M, Gupta S, Jain A. Evaluation of dentine hypersensitivity in adult population with chronic periodontitis visiting dental hospital in Chandigarh. Indian J Dent Res. 2016;27:249-55. [DOI:10.4103/0970-9290.186239] [PMID]
22. Udoye CI. Pattern and distribution of cervical dentine hypersensitivity in a Nigerian tertiary hospital. Odontostomatol Trop. 2006 Dec;29(116):19-22.
23. Chowdhary Z, Gupta P, Kaur J, Garg Y, Swarup N. Multifaceted assessment of dentine hypersensitivity, evaluation of demographic prevalence along with associated factors: A cross-sectional study. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2019 Jan-Feb;23(1):64-8. [DOI:10.4103/jisp.jisp_425_18] [PMID] [PMCID]
24. Ye W, Feng XP, Li R. The prevalence of dentine hypersensitivity in Chinese adults. J Oral Rehabil. 2012 Mar;39(3):182-7. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02248.x] [PMID]
25. Oderinu OH, Savage KO, Uti OG, Adegbulugbe IC. Prevalence of self-reported hypersensitive teeth among a group of Nigerian undergraduate students. Niger Postgrad Med J. 2011 Sep;18(3):205-9.
26. Vandana KL, Haneet RK. Cementoenamel junction: an insight. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2014 Sep;18(5):549-54 [DOI:10.4103/0972-124X.142437] [PMID] [PMCID]
27. Bahsi E, Dalli M, Uzgur R, Turkal M, Hamidi MM, Colak H. An analysis of the aetiology, prevalence and clinical features of dentine hypersensitivity in a general dental population. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2012 Aug;16(8):1107-16.
28. Liu B, Zhang M, Chen Y, Yao Y. Tooth wear in aging people: an investigation of the prevalence and the influential factors of incisal/occlusal tooth wear in Northwest China. BMC Oral Health. 2014;14:65. [DOI:10.1186/1472-6831-14-65] [PMID] [PMCID]
29. Zhang Y, Cheng R, Cheng G, Zhang X. Prevalence of dentine hypersensitivity in Chinese rural adults with dental fluorosis. J Oral Rehabil. 2014 Apr;41(4):289-95. [DOI:10.1111/joor.12145] [PMID]
30. Suge T, Kawasaki A, Ishikawa K, Matsuo T, Ebisu S. Effects of plaque control on the patency of dentinal tubules: an in vivo study in beagle dogs. J Periodontol. 2006 Mar;77(3):454-9. [DOI:10.1902/jop.2006.050159] [PMID]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
