[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
:: Volume 4, Issue 2 (Journal of Research in Dental & Maxillofacial Sciences Spring 2019) ::
J Res Dentomaxillofac Sci 2019, 4(2): 26-31 Back to browse issues page
In-Vitro Comparative Study of the Effect of Four Finishing and Polishing Tools on Surface Roughness of a Microhybrid Resin Composite
S Nemati Anaraki1, H Kazemi2, Z GHafari3, Z Naser4, T Bitaraf * 5
1- Assistant professor, Restorative Dept, faculty of Dentistry,Tehran medical sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2- Assistant professor, Restorative Dept, faculty of Dentistry,Tehran medical sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3- Dentist, Tehran, Iran
4- Dentist, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
5- Assistant professor, Dental Implant Research Center, Dental Faculty, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran , taherehbitaraf@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (262 Views)
Background and Aim: The complications of unwanted surface roughness of composite restorations are highly common due to the increasing use of this restorative material. Therefore, the present study was designed to compare the effect of four finishing and polishing (F&P) tools on surface roughness of microhybrid resin composites.
Materials and Methods: This experimental study was performed on 42 samples of CLEARFIL™ AP-X ​​microhybrid composite, which were divided into four groups of different F&P methods and one control group as follows: control (n=2), Flexi-D discs (n=10), Flexi-D + diamond polishing paste (n=10), Intensive twisted rubber polisher (n=10), and Rubber Polisher Teco (n=10). The samples were examined by profilometry. Surface roughness (Ra) of each specimen was measured at three points, and the mean value was considered as surface roughness. The results were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc statistical tests.
Results: The surface roughness of composite discs in an ascending order was as follows: control (0.048±0.014 µm), Flexi-D disc (0.179±0.132 µm), Intensive twisted rubber polisher (0.233±0.105 µm), Flexi-D disc with diamond polishing paste (0.232±0.141 µm), and Rubber Polisher Teco (0.251±0.087 µm; P=0.001). The difference between the two groups of Flexi-D disc with diamond polishing paste and Rubber Polisher Teco was not statistically significant (P=0.742). The level of surface roughness in Flexi-D samples was significantly lower than that of the other samples (P<0.05).
Conclusion: It seems that the Flexi-D disc is the best F&P tool for microhybrid resin composites.
Keywords: Dental Polishing / Instrumentation, Composite Resin, Surface Properties, Materials Testing
Full-Text [PDF 280 kb]   (87 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (61 Views)  
Type of Study: Original article | Subject: Oral & maxillofacial surgery
* Corresponding Author Address: Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
1. 1. Cenci MS, Venturini D, Pereira-Cenci T, Piva E, Demarco FF. The effect of polishing techniques and time on the surface characteristics and sealing ability of resin composite restorations after one-year storage. Oper Dent. 2008 Mar-Apr;33(2):169-76. [DOI:10.2341/07-66]
2. Oliveira ALBMd, Garcia PPNS, Santos PAd, Campos JÁDB. Surface roughness and hardness of a composite resin: influence of finishing and polishing and immersion methods. Mater Res. 2010;13(3):409-15. [DOI:10.1590/S1516-14392010000300021]
3. Ortengren U, Wellendorf H, Karlsson S, Ruyter IE. Water sorption and solubility of dental composites and identification of monomers released in an aqueous environment. J Oral Rehabil. 2001 Dec;28(12):1106-15. [DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00802.x]
4. Venturini D, Cenci MS, Demarco FF, Camacho GB, Powers JM. Effect of polishing techniques and time on surface roughness, hardness and microleakage of resin composite restorations. Oper Dent. 2006 Jan-Feb;31(1):11-7. [DOI:10.2341/04-155]
5. Yap AU, Ong SB, Yap WY, Tan WS, Yeo JC. Surface texture of resin-modified glass ionomer cements: effects of finishing/polishing time. Oper Dent. 2002 Sep-Oct;27(5):462-7.
6. Wilder AD Jr, Swift EJ Jr, May KN Jr, Thompson JY, McDougal RA. Effect of finishing technique on the microleakage and surface texture of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials. J Dent. 2000 Jul;28(5):367-73. [DOI:10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00075-5]
7. Watanabe T, Miyazaki M, Takamizawa T, Kurokawa H, Rikuta A, Ando S. Influence of polishing duration on surface roughness of resin composites. J Oral Sci. 2005 Mar;47(1):21-5. [DOI:10.2334/josnusd.47.21]
8. Sahbaz C, Bahsi E, Ince B, Bakir EP, Cellik O. Effect of the different finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of three different posterior composite resins. Scanning. 2016 Sep;38(5):448-454. [DOI:10.1002/sca.21295]
9. Antonson SA, Yazici AR, Kilinc E, Antonson DE, Hardigan PC. Comparison of different finishing/polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of resin composites. J Dent. 2011 Jul;39 Suppl 1:e9-17. [DOI:10.1016/j.jdent.2011.01.006]
10. da Costa JB, Goncalves F, Ferracane JL. Comparison of two-step versus four-step composite finishing/polishing disc systems: evaluation of a new two-step composite polishing disc system. Oper Dent. 2011 Mar-Apr;36(2):205-12. [DOI:10.2341/10-162-L]
11. de Moraes RR, Gonçalves Lde S, Lancellotti AC, Consani S, Correr-Sobrinho L, Sinhoreti MA. Nanohybrid resin composites: nanofiller loaded materials or traditional microhybrid resins? Oper Dent. 2009 Sep-Oct;34(5):551-7. [DOI:10.2341/08-043-L]
12. Janus J, Fauxpoint G, Arntz Y, Pelletier H, Etienne O. Surface roughness and morphology of three nanocomposites after two different polishing treatments by a multitechnique approach. Dent Mater. 2010 May;26(5):416-25. [DOI:10.1016/j.dental.2009.09.014]
13. Senawongse P, Pongprueksa P. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites after polishing and brushing. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2007;19(5):265-73; discussion 274-5. [DOI:10.1111/j.1708-8240.2007.00116.x]
14. Silikas N, Kavvadia K, Eliades G, Watts D. Surface characterization of modern resin composites: a multitechnique approach. Am J Dent. 2005 Apr;18(2):95-100.
15. Ferreira PM, Souto SH, Borges BC, de Assunção IV, da Costa GD. Impact of a novel polishing method on the surface roughness and micromorphology of nanofilled and microhybrid composite resins. Rev Port deEstomatol Med Dent Cir Maxillofac. 2015 Jan-Mar;56(1):18-24. [DOI:10.1016/j.rpemd.2015.01.002]
16. Daud A, Gray G, Lynch CD, Wilson NHF, Blum IR. A randomised controlled study on study on the use of finishing and polishing systems on different resin composites using 3D contact optical profilometry and scanning electron microscopy. J Dent. 2018 Apr;71:25-30. [DOI:10.1016/j.jdent.2018.01.008]
17. Gönülol N, Yilmaz F. The effects of finishing and polishing techniques on surface roughness and color stability of nanocomposites. J Dent. 2012 Dec;40 Suppl 2:e64-70. [DOI:10.1016/j.jdent.2012.07.005]
18. Turssi CP, Ferracane JL, Serra MC. Abrasive wear of resin composites as related to finishing and polishing procedures. Dent Mater. 2005 Jul;21(7):641-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.dental.2004.10.011]
19. Botta AC, Duarte S Jr, Paulin Filho PI, Gheno SM, Powers JM. Surface roughness of enamel and four resin composites. Am J Dent. 2009;22(5):252-4.
20. Aytac F, Karaarslan ES, Agaccioglu M, Tastan E, Buldur M, Kuyucu E. Effects of Novel Finishing and Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness and Morphology of Nanocomposites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2016 Jul;28(4):247-61. [DOI:10.1111/jerd.12215]
21. Cazzaniga G, Ottobelli M, Ionescu AC, Paolone G, Gherlone E, Ferracane JL, et al. In vitro biofilm formation on resin-based composites after different finishing and polishing procedures. J Dent. 2017 Dec;67:43-52. [DOI:10.1016/j.jdent.2017.07.012]
22. Yadav RD, Raisingani D, Jindal D, Mathur R. A Comparative Analysis of Different Finishing and Polishing Devices on Nanofilled, Microfilled, and Hybrid Composite: A Scanning Electron Microscopy and Profilometric Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016 Jul-Sep;9(3):201-208. [DOI:10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1364]
23. Ergücü Z, Türkün LS. Surface roughness of novel resin composites polished with one-step systems. Oper Dent. 2007 Mar-Apr;32(2):185-92. [DOI:10.2341/06-56]
24. Yalcin F, Korkmaz Y, Baseren M. The effect of two different polishing techniques on microleakage of new composites in Class V restorations. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2006;7(5):18-25. [DOI:10.5005/jcdp-7-5-18]
25. Kaizer MR, de Oliveira-Ogliari A, Cenci MS, Opdam NJ, Moraes RR. Do nanofill or submicron composites show improved smoothness and gloss? A systematic review of in vitro studies. Dent Mater. 2014 Apr;30(4):e41-78. [DOI:10.1016/j.dental.2014.01.001]
26. Çelık EU, Aladağ A, Türkün LŞ, Yilmaz G. Color changes of dental resin composites before and after polymerization and storage in water. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2011 Jun;23(3):179-88. [DOI:10.1111/j.1708-8240.2011.00421.x]
27. Setcos JC, Tarim B, Suzuki S. Surface finish produced on resin composites by new polishing systems. Quintessence Int. 1999 Mar;30(3):169-73.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:


XML     Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Nemati Anaraki S, Kazemi H, GHafari Z, Naser Z, Bitaraf T. In-Vitro Comparative Study of the Effect of Four Finishing and Polishing Tools on Surface Roughness of a Microhybrid Resin Composite. J Res Dentomaxillofac Sci. 2019; 4 (2) :26-31
URL: http://jrdms.dentaliau.ac.ir/article-1-256-en.html

Volume 4, Issue 2 (Journal of Research in Dental & Maxillofacial Sciences Spring 2019) Back to browse issues page
Journal of Research in Dental and Maxillofacial Sciences
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 32 queries by YEKTAWEB 4056