[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
:: Volume 4, Issue 4 (Journal of Research in Dental & Maxillofacial Sciences Autumn 2019) ::
J Res Dentomaxillofac Sci 2019, 4(4): 23-27 Back to browse issues page
Evaluation of the Effect of Two Types of Autopolymerizing Acrylic Resin Splints on Dimensional Accuracy in Open Tray Impression Technique
M Neshandar1, F Baloch2, Ss Mousavisedighi3, T Bitaraf * 4
1- Associate Professor, Prosthodontics Dept, Member ship of Dental Material Research Center, Faculty of Dentistry, Tehran Medical Sciences,, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2- Associate Professor, Prosthodontics Dept, Faculty of Dentistry, Tehran Medical Sciences,, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3- Dentist, Tehran, Iran.
4- Assistant professor, Dental Implant Research Center, Dental Faculty, Tehran Medical Sciences,, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran , taherehbitaraf@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (193 Views)

Background and Aim: One of the main goals in the fabrication of an implant-supported prosthesis is to build a superstructure with passive fitness. If this fails, it will lead to the failure of the implant components. This study aimed to investigate the effect of Duralay and Pattern Resin splinting materials on dimensional accuracy in the open tray impression technique.
Materials and Methods: An edentulous acrylic model was developed. In the lateral teeth area, two implants (CMI, Neobiotech Co.) were placed perpendicularly and parallel to each other. The implants were cemented with cyanoacrylate. Pattern Resin (n=10) and Duralay (n=10) were used to splint the impression copings, and the impression was taken using the open tray technique. The main casts (20 pieces) were made with Vel-Mix type IV plaster using a vacuum mixer. The dimensional changes of each group were measured using a multi-axial coordinator. T-test was used to analyze the data.
Results: The mean dimensional changes of implant position transfer at the x-axis were 5.04±0.37 μm for Duralay and 5.58±0.13 μm for Pattern Resin. The mean dimensional changes of implant position transfer at the y-axis were 7.01±0.49 µm for Duralay and 6.78±0.15 µm for Pattern Resin. The mean dimensional changes of implant position transfer at the z-axis were 7.62±0.71 µm for Duralay and 6.86±0.12 µm for Pattern Resin. T-test showed that the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (P>0.05).
Conclusion: According to the results, Duralay and Pattern Resin were not significantly different regarding dimensional changes in the open tray impression technique.

Keywords: Dental Implant, Dental Impression Technique, Splints, Acrylic Resins
Full-Text [PDF 231 kb]   (64 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (24 Views)  
Type of Study: Original article | Subject: Dental implant
* Corresponding Author Address: Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
References
1. 1. Seyedan K, Sazgara H, Kalalipour M, Alavi K. Dimensional accuracy of polyether and poly vinyl siloxane materials for different implant impression technique. Res J Appl Sci. 2008;3:257-63.
2. Rismanchian M, Monirifard R. Implant impression techniques: A review article. J Islam Dent Assoc Iran. 2008:20(3):234-42.
3. Holst S, Blatz MB, Bergler M, Goellner M, Wichmann M. Influence of impression material and time on the 3-dimensional accuracy of implant impressions. Quintessence Int. 2007 Jan;38(1):67-73.
4. Choi JH, Lim YJ, Yim SH, Kim CW. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007 Sep-Oct;22(5):761-8.
5. Walker MP, Ries D, Borello B. Implant cast accuracy as a function of impression techniques and impression material viscosity. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008 Jul-Aug;23(4):669-74.
6. Prithviraj DR, Pujari M, Garg P, Shruthi D. Accuracy of the implant impression obtained from different impression materials and techniques: review. J Clin Exp Dent. 2011;3(2):106-11. [DOI:10.4317/jced.3.e106]
7. Saini HS, Jain S, Kumar S, Aggarwal R, Choudhary S, Reddy NK. Evaluating the Effect of Different Impression Techniques and Splinting Methods on the Dimensional Accuracy of Multiple Implant Impressions: An in vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018 Aug 1;19(8):1005-1012. [DOI:10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2373] [PMID]
8. Hariharan R, Shankar C, Rajan M, Baig MR, Azhagarasan NS. Evaluation of accuracy of multiple dental implant impressions using various splinting materials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010 Jan-Feb;25(1):38-44.
9. Joseph TM, Ravichandran R, Lylajam S, Viswabharan P, Janardhanan K, Rajeev S. Evaluation of positional accuracy in multiple implants using four different splinting materials: An in vitro study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2018 Jul-Sep;18(3):239-247. [DOI:10.4103/jips.jips_27_18] [PMID] [PMCID]
10. Selvaraj S, Dorairaj J, Mohan J, Simon P. Comparison of implant cast accuracy of multiple implant impression technique with different splinting materials: An in vitro study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2016 Apr-Jun;16(2):167-75. [DOI:10.4103/0972-4052.167937] [PMID] [PMCID]
11. Kavadia V, Kourtis S, Zoidis P, Sarafianou A. The influence of impression coping splinting on the accuracy of the open-tray technique. Gen Dent. 2019 May-Jun;67(3):e5-e9.
12. Pujari M, Garg P, Prithviraj DR. Evaluation of accuracy of casts of multiple internal connection implant prosthesis obtained from different impression materials and techniques: an in vitro study. J Oral Implantol. 2014 Apr;40(2):137-45. [DOI:10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00207] [PMID]
13. Vigolo P, Fonzi F, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G. An evaluation of impression techniques for multiple internal connection implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 2004 Nov;92(5):470-6. [DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.08.015] [PMID]
14. Gibbs SB, Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Ahuja S. Comparison of polymerization shrinkage of pattern resins. J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Aug;112(2):293-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.02.006] [PMID]
15. Conrad HJ, Pesun IJ, DeLong R, Hodges JS. Accuracy of two impression techniques with angulated implants. J Prosthet Dent. 2007 Jun;97(6):349-56. [DOI:10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60023-7]
16. Daoudi MF, Setchell DJ, Searson LJ. A laboratory investigation of the accuracy of two impression techniques for single-tooth implants. Int J Prosthodont. 2001 Mar-Apr;14(2):152-8.
17. Kallus T, Bessing C. Loose gold screws frequently occur in full-arch fixed prostheses supported by osseointegrated implants after 5 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1994 Mar-Apr;9(2):169-78.
18. Elshenawy EA, Alam-Eldein AM, Abd Elfatah FA. Cast accuracy obtained from different impression techniques at different implant angulations (in vitro study). Int J Implant Dent. 2018 Mar 20;4(1):9. [DOI:10.1186/s40729-018-0118-6] [PMID] [PMCID]
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Neshandar M, Baloch F, Mousavisedighi S, Bitaraf T. Evaluation of the Effect of Two Types of Autopolymerizing Acrylic Resin Splints on Dimensional Accuracy in Open Tray Impression Technique. J Res Dentomaxillofac Sci. 2019; 4 (4) :23-27
URL: http://jrdms.dentaliau.ac.ir/article-1-250-en.html


Volume 4, Issue 4 (Journal of Research in Dental & Maxillofacial Sciences Autumn 2019) Back to browse issues page
Journal of Research in Dental and Maxillofacial Sciences
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.06 seconds with 32 queries by YEKTAWEB 4056