[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
:: Volume 4, Issue 4 (Journal of Research in Dental & Maxillofacial Sciences Autumn 2019) ::
J Res Dentomaxillofac Sci 2019, 4(4): 11-16 Back to browse issues page
Comparison of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons’ and Orthodontists’ Treatment Plans for Inclined Class III Patients
H Mirmohamadsadeghi * 1, A Bayatian2 , M Dashti3 , M Ardeshirzadeh3 , S Kazemifard4, A Sadeghi3
1- Orthodontic Department, School of Dentistry, Dental Research Center, Research Institute of Dental Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
2- Post Graduated Student, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Dental school, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3- Dentist, Tehran, Iran.
4- Dentist
Abstract:   (228 Views)
Background and Aim: The ability to predict the final result of the facial profile has a major rule in treatment planning since the main objective of most patients for orthognathic surgeries is to improve their overall aesthetics. On the other hand, treatment planning for borderline patients is more difficult and challenging. Sometimes, we have to consider all the aspects of the dentofacial profile and choose the best treatment plan. This study aimed to evaluate and compare different treatment plans proposed by oral and maxillofacial surgeons and orthodontists for inclined Class III patients.
Materials and Methods: This review has been done by searching the English articles published between 1998 and 2019 in the PubMed and Google Scholar databases using the following keywords: Clinical Protocols, Malocclusion, Angle Class III, Surgeons, and Orthodontists.
Conclusion: The comparison of the treatment plans between orthodontists and maxillofacial surgeons for inclined Class III patients showed no significant differences. The patients reached optimal function and aesthetics with both treatment plans.
Keywords: Clinical Protocols, Malocclusion, Angle Class III, Surgeons, Orthodontists
Full-Text [PDF 288 kb]   (102 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (49 Views)  
Type of Study: Original article | Subject: Oral & maxillofacial surgery
* Corresponding Author Address: Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
References
1. Schabel BJ, Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA. Clinical photography vs digital video clips for the assessment of smile esthetics. Angle Orthod. 2010 Jul;80(4):490-6. [DOI:10.2319/052207-243.1] [PMID]
2. Turpin DL. Predicting treatment results with video imaging systems. Angle Orthod. 1997 Oct;67(5):323-24.
3. Fabré M, Mossaz C, Christou P, Kiliaridis S. Professionals' and laypersons' appreciation of various options for Class III surgical correction. Eur J Orthod. 2010 Aug;32(4):395-402. [DOI:10.1093/ejo/cjp104] [PMID]
4. Ruf S, Pancherz H. Orthognathic surgery and dentofacial orthopedics in adult Class II Division 1 treatment: mandibular sagittal split osteotomy versus Herbst appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004 Aug;126(2):140-52. [DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.02.011] [PMID]
5. Mirhashemi A, Parhiz A. One jaw or Two jaws? What is current trend among surgeons and orthodontists? J Craniomaxillofac Res. 2014 Winter/Spring;1(1-2):21-4.
6. Rabie AB, Wong RW, Min GU. Treatment in Borderline Class III Malocclusion: Orthodontic Camouflage (Extraction) Versus Orthognathic Surgery. Open Dent J. 2008 MAR;2:38-48. [DOI:10.2174/1874210600802010038] [PMID] [PMCID]
7. Stellzig-Eisenhauer A, Lux CJ, Schuster G. Treatment decision in adult patients with Class III malocclusion: orthodontic therapy or orthognathic surgery? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002 Jul;122(1):27-37. [DOI:10.1067/mod.2002.123632] [PMID]
8. Ackerman JL, Proffit WR. Communication in orthodontic treatment planning: bioethical and informed consent issues. Angle Orthod. 1995;65(4):253-61.
9. Tseng YC, Pan CY, Chou ST, Liao CY, Lai ST, Chen CM, et al. Treatment of adult Class III malocclusions with orthodontic therapy or orthognathic surgery: receiver operating characteristic analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 May;139(5):e485-93. [DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.12.014] [PMID]
10. Kerr WJ, Miller S, Dawber JE. Class III malocclusion: surgery or orthodontics? Br J Orthod. 1992 Feb;19(1):21-4. [DOI:10.1179/bjo.19.1.21] [PMID]
11. Martinez P, Bellot-Arcís C, Llamas JM, Cibrian R, Gandia JL, Paredes-Gallardo V. Orthodontic camouflage versus orthognathic surgery for class III deformity: comparative cephalometric analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Apr;46(4):490-5. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijom.2016.12.001] [PMID]
12. Eslami S, Faber J, Fateh A, Sheikholaemmeh F, Grassia V, Jamilian A. Treatment decision in adult patients with class III malocclusion: surgery versus orthodontics. Prog Orthod. 2018 Aug 2;19(1):28 [DOI:10.1186/s40510-018-0218-0] [PMID] [PMCID]
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Mirmohamadsadeghi H, Bayatian A, Dashti M, Ardeshirzadeh M, Kazemifard S, Sadeghi A. Comparison of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons’ and Orthodontists’ Treatment Plans for Inclined Class III Patients. J Res Dentomaxillofac Sci. 2019; 4 (4) :11-16
URL: http://jrdms.dentaliau.ac.ir/article-1-241-en.html


Volume 4, Issue 4 (Journal of Research in Dental & Maxillofacial Sciences Autumn 2019) Back to browse issues page
Journal of Research in Dental and Maxillofacial Sciences
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.06 seconds with 32 queries by YEKTAWEB 4056