Volume 3, Issue 4 (10-2018)
J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci 2018, 3(4): 26-32 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Jalalian S, Emami Arjomand M, Mahavi A. Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Strength of Cusp Coverage with Composite Versus Unsupported Enamel Reinforced with Composite in Posterior Dental Restorations. J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci 2018; 3 (4) :26-32
URL: http://jrdms.dentaliau.ac.ir/article-1-215-en.html
URL: http://jrdms.dentaliau.ac.ir/article-1-215-en.html
1- Assistant professor, Restorative Dept, faculty of Dentistry,Islamic Azad University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. , shahariar.jalalian@yahoo.com
2- Restorative Dept,faculty of Dentistry
3- Dentist
2- Restorative Dept,faculty of Dentistry
3- Dentist
Abstract: (3546 Views)
Background and aim: Efficient bonding techniques should be employed for strengthening tooth structure. Whether to preserve intact dental tissue or to sacrifice some undermined parts can still be challenging. We aimed to evaluate the fracture strength of cusp coverage with composite versus unsupported enamel reinforced with composite in posterior restorations.
Materials and methods: In this in-vitro study, over-impressions were made from 36 sound human maxillary premolars using bleaching shields. The teeth were randomly divided into three groups (n=12): group 1) intact teeth, group 2) teeth with MOD cavities without cusp coverage, and group 3) teeth with MOD cavities and 1.5 mm of buccal and palatal cusp coverage. Wide MOD cavities were prepared such that only 1 mm of intact enamel was left unsupported at margins. The cavities were restored using light-cure glass ionomer and P60 composite using the over-impressions to achieve the normal tooth anatomy. The teeth were stored in water at 37°C for a week, and their fracture resistance was assessed using a universal testing machine. The load at fracture was recorded in Newton (N). Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s test with a 95% confidence interval (CI).
Results: The mean±standard deviation (SD) of fracture load was 1834.62±104.04 N in group 1, 750.34±147.46 N in group 2, and 1211.30±210.85 N in group 3. One-way ANOVA revealed significant differences between the groups (P=0.001). Likewise, Tukey’s test showed that the difference between the groups was statistically significant (P<0.05).
Conclusion: Using composite in restoring unsupported enamel must be combined with cusp coverage to increase fracture strength.
Materials and methods: In this in-vitro study, over-impressions were made from 36 sound human maxillary premolars using bleaching shields. The teeth were randomly divided into three groups (n=12): group 1) intact teeth, group 2) teeth with MOD cavities without cusp coverage, and group 3) teeth with MOD cavities and 1.5 mm of buccal and palatal cusp coverage. Wide MOD cavities were prepared such that only 1 mm of intact enamel was left unsupported at margins. The cavities were restored using light-cure glass ionomer and P60 composite using the over-impressions to achieve the normal tooth anatomy. The teeth were stored in water at 37°C for a week, and their fracture resistance was assessed using a universal testing machine. The load at fracture was recorded in Newton (N). Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s test with a 95% confidence interval (CI).
Results: The mean±standard deviation (SD) of fracture load was 1834.62±104.04 N in group 1, 750.34±147.46 N in group 2, and 1211.30±210.85 N in group 3. One-way ANOVA revealed significant differences between the groups (P=0.001). Likewise, Tukey’s test showed that the difference between the groups was statistically significant (P<0.05).
Conclusion: Using composite in restoring unsupported enamel must be combined with cusp coverage to increase fracture strength.
Type of Study: Original article |
Subject:
Oral & maxillofacial surgery
References
1. 1. Zahed Pasha Y, Esmaeili Dooki M, Haji Ahmadi M, Asgardon G, Ghadimi R, Baleghi M, et al. Effect of Risk Factors on Low Birth
2. Weight Neonates. JBUMS. 2004;6(2):18-24. [DOI:10.7748/ns.18.18.24.s37]
3. Michalowicz BS, Gustafsson A Thumbigere- Math V, Buhlin K. The effects of periodontal treatment on pregnancy outcomes.
4. J Periodontol. 2013 Apr;84(4Suppl):S195-208.
5. Rajapakse PS, Nagarathne M, Chandrasekra KB, Dasanayake AP. Periodontal disease and prematurity among non-smoking
6. Sri Lankan women. J Dent Res. 2005 Mar;84(3):274-7. [DOI:10.1177/154405910508400313] [PMID]
7. Agueda A, Ramón JM, Manau C, Guerrero A, Echeverría JJ. Periodontal disease as a risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcomes: a prospective cohort study. J Clin Periodontol. 2008 Jan;35(1):16-22.
8. Gomes-Filho IS, Cruz SS, Rezende EJ, Dos Santos CA, Soledade KR, Magalhães MA, et al. Exposure measurement in the association between periodontal disease and prematurity/low birth weight. J Clin Periodontol. 2007 Nov;34(11):957-63. [DOI:10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01141.x] [PMID]
9. Baccaglini L. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials shows no evidence that periodontal treatment during pregnancy
10. prevents adverse pregnancy outcomes. J Am Dent Assoc. 2011 Oct;142(10):1192-3. [DOI:10.14219/jada.archive.2011.0089] [PMID]
11. Al-Habashneh R, Aljundi SH, Alwaeli HA. Survey of medical doctors' attitudes and knowledge of the association between oral
12. health and pregnancy outcomes. Int J Dent Hyg. 2008 Aug;6(3):214-20.
13. Chang HH1, Larson J, Blencowe H, Spong CY, Howson CP, Cairns-Smith S, et al. Preventing preterm births: analysis of trends and potential reductions with interventions in 39 countries with very high human development index.Lancet. 2013 Jan 19;381(9862):223-34. [DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61856-X]
14. Emrich LJ, Shlossman M, Genco RJ. Periodontal disease in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Periodontol. 1991 Feb;62(2):123-31. [DOI:10.1902/jop.1991.62.2.123] [PMID]
15. Boggess KA, Urlaub DM, Massey KE, Moos MK, Matheson MB, Lorenz C. Oral hygiene practices and dental service utilization
16. among pregnant women. J Am Dent Assoc. 2010 May;141(5):553-61.
17. Vergnes JN, Pastor-Harper D, Constantin D, Bedos C, Kaminski M, Nabet C, et al. [Perceived oral health and use of dental
18. services during pregnancy: the MaterniDent study]. [Article in French]. Sante Publique. 2013 May-Jun;25(3):281-92. [DOI:10.3917/spub.253.0281] [PMID]
19. Wilder R, Robinson C, Jared HL, Lieff S, Boggess K. Obstetricians' knowledge and practice behaviors concerning periodontal
20. health and preterm delivery and low birth weight. J Dent Hyg. 2007 Fall;81(4):81.
21. Morgan MA, Crall J, Goldenberg RL, Schulkin J. Oral health during pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009 Sep;22(9):733-9. [DOI:10.3109/14767050902926954] [PMID]
22. Tarannum F, Prasad S; Muzammil, Vivekananda L, Jayanthi D, Faizuddin M. Awareness of the association between periodontal disease and pre-term births among general dentists, general medical practitioners and gynecologists. Indian J Public Health. 2013 Apr-Jun;57(2):92-5. [DOI:10.4103/0019-557X.114992] [PMID]
23. Zanata RL, Fernandes KB, Navarro PS. Prenatal dental care: evaluation of professional knowledge of obstetricians and dentists in the cities of Londrina/PR and Bauru/ SP, Brazil, 2004. J Appl Oral Sci. 2008 May-Jun;16(3):194-200. [DOI:10.1590/S1678-77572008000300006] [PMID] [PMCID]
24. Ishikawa I, Sasaki KM, Aoki A, Watanabe H. Effects of Er:YAG laser on peri- odontal therapy. J Int Acad Periodontol. 2003 Jan;5(1):23-8.
25. Offenbacher S. Periodontal diseases: pathogenesis. Ann Periodontol. 1996 Nov;1(1):821-78. [DOI:10.1902/annals.1996.1.1.821] [PMID]
26. Sanz M, Kornman K; working group 3 of the joint EFP/AAP workshop. Periodontitis and adverse pregnancy outcomes: consensus report of the Joint EFP/AAP Workshop on Periodontitis and Systemic Disease. J Periodontol. 2013 Apr;84(4 Suppl):S164-9. [DOI:10.1902/jop.2013.1340016] [PMID]
27. Oppermann RV, Weidlich P, Musskopf ML. Periodontal disease and systemic complications. Braz Oral Res. 2012;26 Suppl [DOI:10.1590/S1806-83242012000700007] [PMID]
28. 1:39-47.
29. Jeffcoat MK, Geurs NC, Reddy MS, Cliver SP, Goldenberg RL, Hauth JC. Periodontal infection and preterm birth: results of
30. a prospective study. J Am Dent Assoc. 2001 Jul;132(7):875-80.
31. López NJ, Smith PC, Gutierrez J. Higher risk of preterm birth and low birth weight in women with periodontal disease. J Dent Res. 2002 Jan;81(1):58-63. [DOI:10.1177/002203450208100113] [PMID]
32. Offenbacher S, Lieff S, Boggess KA, Murtha AP, Madianos PN, Champagne CM, et al. Maternal periodontitis and prematurity.
33. Part 1: Obstetric outcome of prematurity and growth restriction. Ann Periodontol. 2001 Dec;6(1):164-74. [DOI:10.1902/annals.2001.6.1.164] [PMID]
34. Moreu G, Téllez L, González-Jaranay M. Relationship between maternal periodontal disease and low-birth-weight pre-term infants. J Clin Periodontol. 2005 Jun;32(6):622-7. [DOI:10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00722.x] [PMID]
35. Jeffcoat MK, Geurs NC, Reddy MS, Goldenberg RL, Hauth JC. Current evidence regarding periodontal disease as a risk factor
36. in preterm birth. Ann Periodontol. 2001 Dec;6(1):183-8.
37. Marin C, Segura-Egea JJ, Martínez-Sahuquillo A, Bullón P. Correlation between infant birth weight and mother's periodontal status. J Clin Periodontol. 2005 Mar;32(3):299-304. [DOI:10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00661.x] [PMID]
38. Nutalapati R, Ramisetti A, Mutthineni RB, Jampani ND, Kasagani SK. Awareness of association between periodontitis and
39. PLBW among selected population of practicing gynecologists in Andhra Pradesh. Indian J Dent Res. 2011 Sep-Oct;22(5):735. [DOI:10.4103/0970-9290.93474] [PMID]
40. Shanthi V, Vanka A, Bhambal A, Saxena V, Saxena S, Kumar SS. Association of pregnant women periodontal status to preterm and low-birth weight babies: A systematic and evidence- based review. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2012 Jul;9(4):368-80.
41. Lewis CW, Grossman DC, Domoto PK, Deyo RA. The role of the pediatrician in the oral health of children: A national survey. Pediatrics. 2000 Dec;106(6):E84. [DOI:10.1542/peds.106.6.e84] [PMID]
42. Roberts MW, Keels MA, Sharp MC, Lewis JL Jr. Fluoride supplement prescribing and dental referral patterns among academic pediatricians. Pediatrics. 1998 Jan;101(1):E6. [DOI:10.1542/peds.101.1.e6] [PMID]
43. Shenoy RP, Nayak DG, Sequeira PS. Periodontal disease as a risk factor in pre-term low birth weight--an assessment of gynecologists' knowledge: a pilot study. Indian J Dent Res 2009 Jan-Mar;20(1):13-6. [DOI:10.4103/0970-9290.49049] [PMID]
44. Patil SN, Kalburgi NB, Koregol AC, Warad SB, Patil S, Ugale MS. Female sex hormones and periodontal health-awareness among gynecologists - A questionnaire survey. Saudi Dent J. 2012 Apr;24(2):99-104. [DOI:10.1016/j.sdentj.2011.12.001] [PMID] [PMCID]
45. Strafford KE, Shellhaas C, Hade EM. Provider and patient perceptions about dental care during pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2008 Jan;21(1):63-71. [DOI:10.1080/14767050701796681] [PMID]
46. Cohen L, Schaeffer M, Davideau JL, Tenenbaum H, Huck O. Obstetric Knowledge, Attitude, and Behavior Concerning Periodontal Diseases and Treatment Needs in Pregnancy: Influencing Factors in France. J Periodontol. 2015 Mar;86(3):398-405. [DOI:10.1902/jop.2014.140371] [PMID]
47. Rocha JM, Chaves VR, Urbanetz AA, Baldissera Rdos S, Rösing CK. Obstetricians' knowledge of periodontal disease as a potential risk factor for preterm delivery and low birth weight. Braz Oral Res. 2011 May-Jun;25(3):248-54. [DOI:10.1590/S1806-83242011000300010] [PMID]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
