[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
:: Volume 3, Issue 4 (Journal of Research in Dental & Maxillofacial Sciences Autumn 2018) ::
J Res Dentomaxillofac Sci 2018, 3(4): 26-32 Back to browse issues page
Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Strength of Cusp Coverage with Composite Versus Unsupported Enamel Reinforced with Composite in Posterior Dental Restorations
SH Jalalian , M Emami Arjomand , A Mahavi
Department of restorative dentistry,dental branch, Islamic azad university,Tehran,Iran , shahariar.jalalian@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (192 Views)
Background and aim: Efficient bonding techniques should be employed for strengthening tooth structure. Whether to preserve intact dental tissue or to sacrifice some undermined parts can still be challenging. We aimed to evaluate the fracture strength of cusp coverage with composite versus unsupported enamel reinforced with composite in posterior restorations.
Materials and methods: In this in-vitro study, over-impressions were made from 36 sound human maxillary premolars using bleaching shields. The teeth were randomly divided into three groups (n=12): group 1) intact teeth, group 2) teeth with MOD cavities without cusp coverage, and group 3) teeth with MOD cavities and 1.5 mm of buccal and palatal cusp coverage. Wide MOD cavities were prepared such that only 1 mm of intact enamel was left unsupported at margins. The cavities were restored using light-cure glass ionomer and P60 composite using the over-impressions to achieve the normal tooth anatomy. The teeth were stored in water at 37°C for a week, and their fracture resistance was assessed using a universal testing machine. The load at fracture was recorded in Newton (N). Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s test with a 95% confidence interval (CI).
Results: The mean±standard deviation (SD) of fracture load was 1834.62±104.04 N in group 1, 750.34±147.46 N in group 2, and 1211.30±210.85 N in group 3. One-way ANOVA revealed significant differences between the groups (P=0.001). Likewise, Tukey’s test showed that the difference between the groups was statistically significant (P<0.05).
Conclusion: Using composite in restoring unsupported enamel must be combined with cusp coverage to increase fracture strength.
Keywords: Composite Resins, Fracture Strengths, Onlays
Full-Text [PDF 160 kb]   (18 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original article | Subject: Dental material
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA code


XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Jalalian S, Emami Arjomand M, Mahavi A. Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Strength of Cusp Coverage with Composite Versus Unsupported Enamel Reinforced with Composite in Posterior Dental Restorations . J Res Dentomaxillofac Sci. 2018; 3 (4) :26-32
URL: http://jrdms.dentaliau.ac.ir/article-1-215-en.html


Volume 3, Issue 4 (Journal of Research in Dental & Maxillofacial Sciences Autumn 2018) Back to browse issues page
Journal of Research in Dental and Maxillofacial Sciences
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 32 queries by YEKTAWEB 3855