Volume 2, Issue 3 (7-2017)                   J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci 2017, 2(3): 16-21 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Hosseinimehvar B, Alaee A, Azizi A, Shafizadeh N. Risk of Hyposalivation in Menopausal Patients. J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci 2017; 2 (3) :16-21
URL: http://jrdms.dentaliau.ac.ir/article-1-162-en.html
1- Postgraduate Student,Oral Medicine Dept, Dental Branch of Tehran, Islamic Azad University,Tehran, Iran , bahar_mehvar@yahoo.com
2- Assistant professor, Oral medicine Dept, Member of Dental Material Research Center, Dental Branch of Tehran, Islamic Azad University,Tehran,Iran
3- professor, Oral Medicine Dept, Member of Dental Implant Research Center, Dental Branch of Tehran, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
4- Assistant professor,Pediatric dentistry Dep, Dental Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (4805 Views)

Background and aim: Hyposalivation is one of the most common complications during menopause, which affects the quality of life. The aim of the present study was to assess the correlation between menopause and salivary flow rate.
Materials and methods: This historical-cohort study was conducted on 80 healthy women. Forty postmenopausal women were placed in the case group, while 40 premenopausal women were selected as the control group. The participants were selected from among non-smokers and non-alcoholics and had no systemic diseases. The saliva level of the participants was measured by using the Modified Schirmer’s Test (MST) and modified Fox questionnaire. The participants were asked to sit upright, swallow their saliva and hold up their tongue. A strip was placed on the floor of the mouth, and the length of the wet and discolored area on the strip was measured after 3 minutes. Data were analyzed using SPSS 22 according to Mann-U-Whitney and Chi-square tests.
Results: According to the MST, the prevalence of hyposalivation was 35% in premenopausal women and 65% in postmenopausal women, with a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P<0.001). According to the modified Fox questionnaire, the prevalence of normal salivary flow and mild xerostomia in premenopausal women was 90%, while this rate was equal to 62.5% in postmenopausal women. The prevalence of severe xerostomia was 15% in postmenopausal women, while none of the premenopausal subjects had severe xerostomia. The incidence of hyposalivation in postmenopausal women is significantly higher than that in premenopausal women (P<0.005).
Conclusion: It seems that the unstimulated salivary flow rate decreases after menopause.

Full-Text [PDF 295 kb]   (2325 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (980 Views)  
Type of Study: Original article | Subject: Oral medicine

1. Borhan Mojabi K, Esfahani M, Jahani Hashemi H. Evaluation of Unstimulated Salivary Flow Rate and Oral Symptoms in Menopausal Women. J Dent (Tehran) 2007;4(3):103-6.
2. Minicucci EM, Pires RB, Vieira RA, Miot HA, Sposto MR. Assessing the impact of menopause on salivary flow and xerostomia. Aust Dent J 2013 Jun;58(2):230-4.
3. Osterberg T, Landahl S, Hedegård B. Salivary flow, saliva, pH and buffering capacity in 70-year-old men and women. Correlation to dental health, dryness in the mouth, disease and drug treatment. J Oral Rehabil 1984 Mar;11(2):157-70.
4. Arbabi-Kalati F, Mohammadi A, Ghaemi Hesaroeeh S. Assessment the Relationship between Osteoporosis and Oral Dryness in Postmenopausal Women. J Mash Dent Sch 2015;39(2):117-22.
5. Shirzaiy M. Comparison of unstimulated salivary flow rate and oral symptoms between premenopausal and postmenopausal women. J Qazvin Univ Med Sci 2015;19(2):39-45.
6. Bowers L, Fox P, Brennan M. Hyposalivation, the salivary gland disease. In: Burket’s Oral Medicine. 12th ed. House-USA Shelton, 2015:251-252.
7. Dyasanoor S, Saddu SC. Association of Xerostomia and Assessment of Salivary Flow Using Modified Schirmer Test among Smokers and Healthy Individuals: A Preliminutesary Study. J Clin Diagn Res 2014 Jan;8(1):211-3.
8. Santosh P, Nidhi S, Sumita K, Farzan R, Bharati D, Ashok K. Oral findings in postmenopausal women attending dental hospital in Western part of India. J Clin Exp Dent 2013 Feb 1;5(1):e8-e12.
9. Chen A, Wai Y, Lee L, Lake S, Woo SB. Using the modified Schirmer test to measure mouth dryness: a preliminary study. J Am Dent Assoc 2005 Feb;136(2):164-70.
10. Suri V, Suri V. Menopause and oral health. J Midlife Health 2014 Jul-Sep;5(3):115-120.
11. Valimaa H, Savolainen S, Soukka T, Silvoniemi P, Makela S, Kujari H, et al. Estrogen receptor-beta is the predominant estrogen receptor subtype in human oral epithelium and salivary glands. J Endocrinol 2004 Jan;180(1):55-62.
12. Konttinen YT, Stegaev V, Mackiewicz Z, Porola P, Hänninen A, Szodoray P. Salivary glands - “an unisex organ”? Oral Dis 2010 Oct;16(7):577-85.
13. Saluja P, Shetty V, Dave A, Arora M, Hans V, Madan A. Comparative Evaluation of the Effect of Menstruation, Pregnancy and Menopause on Salivary Flow Rate, pH and Gustatory Function. J Clin Diagn Res 2014 Oct;8(10):ZC81-5.
14. Jose A, Siddiqi M, Cronin M, DiLauro TS, Bosma ML. A randomized clinical trial in subjects with dry mouth evaluating subjective perceptions of an experimental oral gel, an oral rinse and a mouth spray compared to water. Am J Dent 2016 Feb;29(1):58-64.
15. Aghahosseini F, Akhavan Karbasi MH. An investigation on the stimulated salivary flow rate in menopause and post menopause women. J Dent Med 2003;16(2):39-45.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Research in Dental and Maxillofacial Sciences

Designed & Developed by: Yektaweb