Volume 1, Issue 4 (12-2016)                   J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci 2016, 1(4): 1-8 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Salem K, Ezaani P. Radiographic Evaluation of the Developmental Stages of Second and Third Molars in 7 to 11-Year-old Children and its Implication in the Treatment of First Molars with Poor Prognosis. J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci 2016; 1 (4) :1-8
URL: http://jrdms.dentaliau.ac.ir/article-1-135-en.html
1- Assistant professor ,Pediatric dentistry Dep, Dental Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran , katayoun.salem@gmail.com
2- Dentist
Abstract:   (5016 Views)

Background and aim: First permanent molars with poor prognosis may be candidate for timely extraction and replacement by second permanent molars. The presence of third molars should be considered in this treatment plan. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the critical developmental stages of permanent second molar and the status of third molar bud in an Iranian population.

Materials and methods: Four hundred panoramic radiographs of 7 to 11-year-old children were evaluated in this descriptive study. Data were collected from patients’ files and through phone interview with parents. The stage of tooth development in each age group was determined according to the modified Demirjian method. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon signed Rank test and Chi-Square test.

Results: Stage E (beginning of root formation) in permanent second molars had the highest prevalence among 8 and 9-year-olds in the mandible, and among 9 and 10-year-olds in the maxilla. The predominant stage of development in third molar buds was stage 0 (no evidence of bud formation) in the corresponding age groups. There was no significant difference between boys and girls in terms of developmental stages. Mandibular second and third molars were more advanced than maxillary molars in terms of development, with no gender predilection.

Conclusion: The beginning of calcification in the furcation area of permanent second molar (Stage E, between 8 to 10 years of age) is the most proper stage to coincide with first molar extraction. However, during this time period, the signs of third molar bud formation are not detectable in many individuals, especially in the maxillary arch.

Full-Text [PDF 422 kb]   (1696 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (576 Views)  
Type of Study: Original article | Subject: Periodontology

1. Cobourne MT, Williams A, Harrison M. National clinical guidelines for the extraction of first permanent molars in children. Br Dent J 2014;217(11):643-8.
2. Bagherpour A, Imanimoghaddam M, Bagherpour MR, Einolghozati M. Dental age assessment among Iranian children aged 6–13 years using the Demirjian method. Forensic Sci Int 2010;197(1-3):121.e1–4.
3. Lewis AJ, Boaz K, Nagesh KR, Srikant N, Gupta N, Nandita KP, et al. Demirjian’s method in the estimation of age: A study on human third molars. J Forensic Dent Sci 2015;7(2):153–7.
4. Orhan K, Ozer L, Orhan AI, Dogan S, Paksoy CS. Radiographic evaluation of third molar development in relation to chronological age among Turkish children and youth. Forensic Sci Int 2007;165(1):46-51.
5. Gill DS, Lee RT, Tredwindec CJ. Treatment Planning for the Loss of First Permanent Molars.Dent Update 2001;28(6):304-8.
6. Almeida MS, Pontual Ados A, Beltrao RT, Pontual ML.The chronology of second molar development in Brazilians and its application to forensic age estimation. Imaging Sci Den 2013;43(1):1-6.
7. Caldas I M, Júlio P, Simoes RJ , Matos E, Afonso A , Magalhaes T. Chronological age estimation based on third molar development in a Portuguese population. Int J Legal Med 2011;125(2):235–43.
8. Kasper KA, Austin D, Kvanli AH, Rios TR, Senn DR. Reliability of Third Molar Development for Age Estimation in a Texas Hispanic Population:A Comparison Study. J Forensic Sci 2009;54( 3):651-7.
9. Arany S, Iino M,Yoshioka N. Radiographic Survey of Third Molar Development in Relation to Chronological Age Among Japanese Juveniles. J Forensic Sci 2004;49(3):534-8.
10. Sisman Y, Uysal T, Yagmur F , Ramoglu S. Third – Molar Development in Relation to chronologic Age in Turkish children and Young Adults . Angle Orthod 2006;77(6):1040-5.
11. Bai Y, Mao J, Zhu S, Wei W.Third-Molar Development in Relation to Chronologic Age in Young Adults of Central China. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci 2008;28(4):487-90.
12. Meini A, Tangl S, Huber C , Maurer B , Watzek G .The chronology of third molar mineralization in the Austrian population – a contribution to forensic age estimation .Forensic Sci Int 2007;169(2-3): 161-7.
13. Lee SS, Byun YS,Park MJ,Choi JH,Yoon CL,Shin KJ.The chronology of second and third molar mineralization in Korean population and application to forensic age estimation. Int J Legal Med 2010;124(6):659-65.
14. Bagherian A, Sadeghi M.Assessment of dental maturity of children aged 3.5 to 13.5 years using the Demirjian method in an Iranian population. J Oral Sci 2011;53(1):37-42.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2023 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Research in Dental and Maxillofacial Sciences

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb