Volume 10, Issue 3 (9-2025)                   J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci 2025, 10(3): 203-209 | Back to browse issues page

Ethics code: IR.IAU.DENTAL.REC97.036


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Hajian Berenjestanaki M, Azizi A, Bazarnoei S, Lawaf S. Effects of GLUMA Desensitizer and 810 nm Low-Level Diode Laser on Retention of Porcelain-Fused-to-Metal Frameworks Cemented with a Self-Adhesive Resin Cement. J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci 2025; 10 (3) :203-209
URL: http://jrdms.dentaliau.ac.ir/article-1-1082-en.html
1- Dentist, private practice.
2- Department of Oral Medicine, TeMS.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
3- Faculty of Dentistry, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
4- Department of Prosthodontics, TeMS.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. , drshlawaf@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (283 Views)
Background and Aim: Dentinal tubules are exposed to the oral environment during preparation of vital teeth for crown restorations, and patients show signs of tooth hypersensitivity. Some treatments have been suggested for dentin hypersensitivity after tooth preparation, such as diode laser (810 nm) irradiation and GLUMA desensitizer. This study aimed to assess the effects of 810 nm diode laser and GLUMA desensitizer on retention of porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM) frameworks cemented with a self-adhesive resin cement.   
Materials and Methods: This in vitro study evaluated 30 intact maxillary first premolars. After tooth preparation with a 0.5 to 0.7 mm finish line above the cementoenamel junction, full metal crowns were cast with a 5 mm diameter ring on their occlusal surface. The specimens were then divided into 3 groups (n=10) of control, 810 nm diode laser, and GLUMA desensitizer. The frameworks were cemented with RelyX U200 self-adhesive resin cement, and their retention was measured by a universal testing machine. Data were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc test (alpha=0.05).   
Results: There was no significant difference in retention between 810 nm diode laser (134.96±37.50 N) and the control (138.17±40.81 N) group (P=0.986). However, framework retention in GLUMA desensitizer group (318.59±56.31 N) was significantly higher than that in other groups (P<0.05).
Conclusion: In this in vitro study, GLUMA desensitizer had a significant positive effect while 810 nm diode laser irradiation did no not have any significant effect on retention of PFM frameworks cemented by RelyX U200 self-adhesive resin cement.
 
Full-Text [PDF 389 kb]   (90 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (51 Views)  
Type of Study: Original article | Subject: Prosthodontics

References
1. Amiri P, Tekie G, Azizi A, Lawaf S. Comparing the Effectiveness of GLUMA and 940 nm Laser for Improving Crown Retention with Self-Adhesive Cement. J Dent (Shiraz). 2025 Mar 1;26(1):61-8.
2. Ayad MF, Johnston WM, Rosenstiel SF. Influence of tooth preparation taper and cement type on recementation strength of complete metal crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2009 Dec;102(6):354-61. [DOI:10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60192-X] [PMID]
3. Dewan H, Sayed ME, Alqahtani NM, Alnajai T, Qasir A, Chohan H. The effect of commercially available desensitizers on bond strength following cementation of zirconia crowns using self-adhesive resin cement-An in vitro study. Materials. 2022 Jan 10;15(2):514. [DOI:10.3390/ma15020514] [PMID] []
4. Sayed ME. The Effect of Dentine Desensitizing Agents on the Retention of Cemented Fixed Dental Prostheses: A Systematic Review. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Mar 6;59(3):515. [DOI:10.3390/medicina59030515] [PMID] []
5. Martini EC, Favoreto MW, Rezende M, de Geus JL, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Topical application of a desensitizing agent containing potassium nitrate before dental bleaching: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Jul;25(7):4311-27. [DOI:10.1007/s00784-021-03994-6] [PMID]
6. Miglani S, Aggarwal V, Ahuja B. Dentin hypersensitivity: Recent trends in management. J Conserv Dent. 2010 Oct;13(4):218-24. [DOI:10.4103/0972-0707.73385] [PMID] []
7. Freitas PM, Simoes A, editors. Lasers in dentistry: guide for clinical practice. John Wiley & Sons; 2015 Apr 27. [DOI:10.1002/9781118987742]
8. Mancuso E, Durso D, Mazzitelli C, Maravic T, Josic U, D'alessandro C, et al. Glutaraldehyde-based desensitizers' influence on bonding performances and dentin enzymatic activity of universal adhesives. J Dent. 2023 Sep;136:104643. [DOI:10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104643] [PMID]
9. Jalandar SS, Pandharinath DS, Arun K, Smita V. Comparison of effect of desensitizing agents on the retention of crowns cemented with luting agents: an in vitro study. J Adv Prosthodont. 2012 Aug;4(3):127-33. [DOI:10.4047/jap.2012.4.3.127] [PMID] []
10. Kumar S, Rupesh PL, Daokar SG, Yadao AK, Ghunawat DB, Sayed SS. Effect of Desensitising Laser Treatment on the Bond Strength of Full Metal Crowns: An In Vitro Comparative Study. J Int Oral Health. 2015 Jul;7(7):36-41.
11. Lawaf S, Jalalian E, Roshan R, Azizi A. Effect of GLUMA desensitizer on the retention of full metal crowns cemented with Rely X U200 self-adhesive cement. J Adv Prosthodont. 2016 Oct;8(5):404-10. [DOI:10.4047/jap.2016.8.5.404] [PMID] []
12. Asnaashari M, Safavi N. Application of Low level Lasers in Dentistry (Endodontic). J Lasers Med Sci. 2013 Spring;4(2):57-66.
13. Parker S. Surgical laser use in implantology and endodontics. Br Dent J. 2007 Apr 14;202(7):377-86. [DOI:10.1038/bdj.2007.284] [PMID]
14. Pilo R, Harel N, Nissan J, Levartovsky S. The Retentive Strength of Cemented Zirconium Oxide Crowns after Dentin Pretreatment with Desensitizing Paste Containing 8% Arginine and Calcium Carbonate. Int J Mol Sci. 2016 Mar 25;17(4):426. [DOI:10.3390/ijms17040426] [PMID] []
15. Shillingburg HT, Hobo S, Whitsett LD, Jacobi R, Brackett SE. Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics. Hanover Park, IL: Quintessence Publishing Company; 2012.
16. Simpler dental laser doctor smile [Internet] 2018 [cited 27 October 2018] [Available from: www.doctor-smile.com.
17. RelyXT™ U200 Self-Adhesive Resin Cement Technical Data Sheet [Internet].
18. Chandavarkar SM, Ram SM. A comparative evaluation of the effect of dentin desensitizers on the retention of complete cast metal crowns. Contemp Clin Dent. 2015 Mar;6(Suppl 1):S45-50. [DOI:10.4103/0976-237X.152937] [PMID] []
19. Acar O, Tuncer D, Yuzugullu B, Celik C. The effect of dentin desensitizers and Nd:YAG laser pre-treatment on microtensile bond strength of self-adhesive resin cement to dentin. J Adv Prosthodont. 2014 Apr;6(2):88-95. [DOI:10.4047/jap.2014.6.2.88] [PMID] []
20. Elizalde-Hernández A, Hardan L, Bourgi R, Isolan CP, Moreira AG, Zamarripa-Calderón JE, et al. Effect of Different Desensitizers on Shear Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive Resin Cements to Dentin. Bioengineering (Basel). 2022 Aug 7;9(8):372. [DOI:10.3390/bioengineering9080372] [PMID] []
21. Gaffar A. Treating hypersensitivity with fluoride varnishes. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1998 Nov;19(11):1088-90.
22. Joudaki M, Azizi A, Bazarnoei S, Lawaf S. Effects of GLUMA Desensitizer and Low-Level 980 nm Diode Laser on the Retention of the Metal Frames of the PFM Crowns Cemented by Self-adhesive Resin Cement (RelyX U200). J Lasers Med Sci. 2025 Jan 21;16:e3. [DOI:10.34172/jlms.2025.03] [PMID] []
23. Qin C, Xu J, Zhang Y. Spectroscopic investigation of the function of aqueous 2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate/ glutaraldehyde solution as a dentin desensitizer. Eur J Oral Sci. 2006 Aug;114(4):354-9. [DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0722.2006.00382.x] [PMID]
24. Pirnat S. Versatility of an 810 nm diode laser in dentistry: an overview. J Laser Health Acad. 2007;4(2):1-9.
25. Umana M, Heysselaer D, Tielemans M, Compere P, Zeinoun T, Nammour S. Dentinal tubules sealing by means of diode lasers (810 and 980 nm): a preliminary in vitro study. Photomed Laser Surg. 2013 Jul;31(7):307-14. [DOI:10.1089/pho.2012.3443] [PMID]
26. Pandey R, Koppolu P, Kalakonda B, Lakshmi BV, Mishra A, Reddy PK, et al. Treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity using low-level laser therapy and 5% potassium nitrate: A randomized, controlled, three arm parallel clinical study. Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2017 Jan-Mar;7(1):63-6. [DOI:10.4103/2229-516X.198526] [PMID] []

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Research in Dental and Maxillofacial Sciences

Designed & Developed by: Yektaweb