Volume 7, Issue 4 (10-2022)
J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci 2022, 7(4): 260-266 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Reddy L, Boringi M, Alluri K, Sujatha M. Palatal Rugae in Gender Discrimination: Auxiliary or Hindrance? A Systematic Review. J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci 2022; 7 (4) :260-266
URL: http://jrdms.dentaliau.ac.ir/article-1-414-en.html
URL: http://jrdms.dentaliau.ac.ir/article-1-414-en.html
1- Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Government Dental College and Hospital, Afzalgunji, Hyderabad. India , padmalavanya1117@gmail.com
2- Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Panineeya Dental College and Hospital Kamalanagar, Dilsukhnagar, Hyderabad, India
3- Government Dental College and Hospital, Vijayawada, India
2- Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Panineeya Dental College and Hospital Kamalanagar, Dilsukhnagar, Hyderabad, India
3- Government Dental College and Hospital, Vijayawada, India
Full-Text [PDF 683 kb]
(669 Downloads)
| Abstract (HTML) (1754 Views)
Full-Text: (723 Views)
|
Abstract
Background and Aim: Uniqueness of rugae can be utilized similar to finger prints when compared with other methods in identification of a person, even with the presence of discrepancies in the patterns obtained in different populations. Nonetheless, it still cannot be used as a potential tool in gender discrimination. This study explored the debatable way of the use of palatal rugae for gender discrimination. Materials and Methods: Key words including “palatal rugae” and “sex determination” were used for searching of the following databases: PubMed Central, EMBASE, EBSCOhost and Cochrane from the earliest available date to January 2019. Out of 296 articles, 257 were excluded after abstract analysis. Only 8 articles were finally included. Results: A total of 1,152 subjects participated in this study, among them, 577 were females and 575 were males. Significant differences were observed in the number, length, and shape of the rugae patterns in both genders from one study to another. Conclusion: In this analysis, we observed that females and males showed varied patterns of rugae on the palate, but males predominantly showed a particular pattern compared with females. Palatal rugae cannot be used as the only tool for gender discrimination. Key Words: Palate; Forensic Dentistry; Sexism; Female; Male Introduction Palatal rugae are the transverse folds that are asymmetric, and irregular elevations seen on the anterior third of the palate behind the incisive papilla. Anatomically, the rugae consist of around 3-7 dense ridges that radiate tangentially from the incisive papilla [1,2]. Among various methods, assessment of palatal rugae is recognized as a tool for personal identification when other methods (like fingerprints, DNA analysis, comparison of ante mortem and post mortem records) are unavailable like when the body is burnt or decomposed and also in edentulous conditions [2,3]. The rugae pattern is considered as a unique pattern in every individual, as they are stable throughout life and remain unchanged except in their length during puberty. Their uniqueness and post mortem resistance makes palatal rugae an ideal forensic identification parameter [3,4]. Application of palatal rugae for identification purpose was first suggested by Allen in 1889. Since then, various studies were conducted in this respect. According to the literature, certain studies reported that males show a particular pattern more predominantly than females, while some other studies mentioned that males and females have a varied pattern and unification, which conflicts with the usage of palatal rugae in sex determination in forensic odontology [5-7]. With this background, we conducted a systematic review with the main objective to assess the role of palatal rugae for gender discrimination for the purpose of identification in forensic odontology. Materials and Methods Search terms “palatal rugae” and “sex determination” were used for searching of the following databases: PubMed Central, EMBASE, EBSCOHOST and Cochrane from the earliest available date to January 2019. Relevant studies on reference lists of retrieved articles were also assessed. Eligibility Criteria: Inclusion criteria: Studies on healthy individuals over 15 years of age, who had no congenital or palatal abnormality, history of trauma, inflammation, orthodontic treatment, denture use, or surgical procedures in the rugae area were included. Exclusion criteria: Comparative studies on palatal rugae, comparison between cheiloscopy (study of lip prints) and rugoscopy for sex determination, digital methods of analysis of the palatal rugae pattern, systematic reviews, editorials, opinions, studies not published in a peer reviewed journal, studies available only as abstracts, studies published in other languages, and comparative observations of palatal rugae were excluded. Article selection: Figure 1 shows the flow diagram of article selection. Summary of evidence and limitations: The studies conducted on palatal rugae revealed that males and females showed varied patterns of wavy, curvy, circular, and straight rugae in different proportions according to the Thomas and Kotze classification. There were significant discrepancies observed based on the number, length and shape of the rugae patterns in both males and females from one study to another. On the contrary, certain studies conducted revealed the rugae patterns to be similar in both males and females. Eight articles were included in the study. Each article is summarized in Table 1 [1,6,7,8-12]. Discussion
Palatal rugae are unique to every individual due to their position in the oral cavity; but in spite of which, palatal rugae cannot be considered as a reliable marker for gender discrimination due to variations observed in the values obtained from different populations and also due to the insufficient means of methods available to differentiate the palatal rugae between males and females [13,14]. The anatomical position of the rugae inside the oral cavity is surrounded by the cheeks, lips, tongue, buccal fat pad, teeth, and bone which keep the rugae protected. According to a study by Jacob and Shalla [15], when rugae were considered as a criterion for identification, 79% accuracy with equivocation was demonstrated. They found that the low level of identification was caused by rugae obliteration in denture fabrication. Palatal rugae tracings derived from dentures do not give the desired accuracy required for forensic analysis [15]. Besides, orthodontic movement, cleft palate surgery, and forced eruption of impacted canines have an influence on rugae pattern. According to a study by Jain and Chowdhary [16], thumb sucking and extractions can produce a local effect on the direction of palatal rugae. It is also possible to consider the possibility of falsification of the rugae pattern in toothless cases [16]. Almeida et al. [17] observed that medial rugae were stable but lateral rugae showed significant changes. Thus, we observed varied levels of discrepancies between one study to another and therefore, conflict with the idea of usage of palatal rugae as a reliable marker for gender discrimination. In this review, a total 8 articles were included after considering the inclusion criteria; all the findings from the studies were summarized, and the authors came to the conclusion that palatal rugae can only be used as an adjuvant and not as primary tool in gender determination . Conclusion Certain studies have stated that palatal rugae can be used as a minimal aid in the field of forensics for sex determination. But, with a varied range of discrepancies observed from population to population, we conclude that palatal rugae cannot be considered as an accurate auxiliary means for gender discrimination. |
Type of Study: Review article |
Subject:
Oral medicine
References
1. Bharath ST, Kumar GR, Dhanapal R, Saraswathi T. Sex deter-mination by discriminant function analysis of palatal rugae from a population of coastal Andhra. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2011 Jul;3(2):58-62. [DOI:10.4103/0975-1475.92144] [PMID] [PMCID]
2. Filho ME, Peres SC, Peres SA, Carvalho MP. Palatal Rugae Pat-terns as Indicators of Identification in Forensic Dentistry. Me-dicina Forense. 2009;14(3):227-¬33.
3. Thomas CJ, Kotze TJ. The palatal ruga pattern: a new classification. J Dent Assoc S Afr. 1983 Mar;38(3):153-7.
4. Harrison A. The palatal rugae in man. Proc Acad Nat Soc 1889;6:245.
5. English WR, Robison SF, Summitt JB, Oesterle LJ, Brannon RB, Morlang WM. Individuality of human palatal rugae. J Forensic Sci. 1988 May;33(3):718-26. [DOI:10.1520/JFS12479J]
6. Harchandani N, Marathe S, Rochani R, Nisa SU. Palatal Rugos-copy: A new era for forensic identification. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol 2015;27(3):393-8. [DOI:10.4103/0972-1363.170469]
7. Dwivedi N, Nagarajappa AK. Morphological analysis of palatal rugae pattern in central Indian population. J Int Soc Prevent Communit Dent 2016;6(5):417¬-22. [DOI:10.4103/2231-0762.192947] [PMID] [PMCID]
8. Surekha R, Anila K, Reddy VS, Hunasgi S, Ravikumar S, Ramesh N. Assessment of palatal rugae patterns in Manipuri and Kerala population. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2012 Jul;4(2):93-6. [DOI:10.4103/0975-1475.109896] [PMID] [PMCID]
9. Chandra S, Pandey V, Wasti A, Mangat SS, Bhagat JK, Singh R. Analysis of Rugae Pattern in Ranchi and Patna Population. J Int Oral Health 2016;8(3):362-6.
10. Paliwal A, Wanjari S, Parwani R. Palatal rugoscopy: Establishing identity. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2010 Jan;2(1):27-31. [DOI:10.4103/0974-2948.71054] [PMID] [PMCID]
11. Balgi P, Bhalekar B, Bhalerao K, Bhide E, Palaskar S,Kathuriya P. Study of palatal rugae pattern in gender identification. J Dent Allied Sci 2014;3(1):13-6. [DOI:10.4103/2277-4696.156519]
12. Alani MM, Thomas SA, Mathew S, Arakkal LJ, Thomas W, Reba PS. Analysis of rugae patterns and arch length in a central Kerala population: An original research. J Int Oral Health 2016;8(1):129-31.
13. Babu GS, Bharath TS, Kumar NG. Characteristics of palatal rugae patterns in west godavari population of India. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013 Oct;7(10):2356-9.
14. Krishnappa S, Srinath S, Bhardwaj P, Mallaya CH. Palatal rugoscopy: Implementation in forensic odontology - A review. J Adv Med Dent Sci. 2013; 1:53-9.
15. Jacob RF, Shalla CL. Postmortem identification of the edentu-lous deceased: denture tissue surface anatomy. J Forensic Sci. 1987 May;32(3):698-702. [DOI:10.1520/JFS12375J]
16. Jain A, Chowdhary R. Palatal rugae and their role in forensic odontology. J Investig Clin Dent. 2014 Aug;5(3):171-8. [DOI:10.1111/j.2041-1626.2013.00150.x] [PMID]
17. Almeida MA, Phillips C, Kula K, Tulloch C. Stability of the palatal rugae as landmarks for analysis of dental casts. Angle Orthod. 1995;65(1):43-8.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
