Volume 7, Issue 4 (10-2022)                   J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci 2022, 7(4): 260-266 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Reddy L, Boringi M, Alluri K, Sujatha M. Palatal Rugae in Gender Discrimination: Auxiliary or Hindrance? A Systematic Review. J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci 2022; 7 (4) :260-266
URL: http://jrdms.dentaliau.ac.ir/article-1-414-en.html
1- Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Government Dental College and Hospital, Afzalgunji, Hyderabad. India , padmalavanya1117@gmail.com
2- Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Panineeya Dental College and Hospital Kamalanagar, Dilsukhnagar, Hyderabad, India
3- Government Dental College and Hospital, Vijayawada, India
Abstract:   (337 Views)
Background and Aim: Uniqueness of rugae can be utilized similar to finger prints when compared with other methods in identification of a person, even with the presence of discrepancies in the patterns obtained in different populations. Nonetheless, it still cannot be used as a potential tool in gender discrimination. This study explored the debatable way of the use of palatal rugae for gender discrimination.  
Materials and Methods: Key words including “palatal rugae” and “sex determination” were used for searching of the following databases: PubMed Central, EMBASE, EBSCOhost and Cochrane from the
earliest available date to January 2019. Out of 296 articles, 257 were excluded after abstract analysis. Only 8 articles were finally
included.

Results: A total of 1,152 subjects participated in this study, among them, 577 were females and 575 were males. Significant differences were observed in the number, length, and shape of the rugae
patterns in both genders from one study to another.

Conclusion: In this analysis, we observed that females and males showed varied patterns of rugae on the palate, but males
predominantly showed a particular pattern compared with females. Palatal rugae cannot be used as the only tool for gender
discrimination.
Full-Text [PDF 683 kb]   (121 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (84 Views)  
Type of Study: Review article | Subject: Oral medicine

References
1. Bharath ST, Kumar GR, Dhanapal R, Saraswathi T. Sex deter-mination by discriminant function analysis of palatal rugae from a population of coastal Andhra. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2011 Jul;3(2):58-62. [DOI:10.4103/0975-1475.92144] [PMID] [PMCID]
2. Filho ME, Peres SC, Peres SA, Carvalho MP. Palatal Rugae Pat-terns as Indicators of Identification in Forensic Dentistry. Me-dicina Forense. 2009;14(3):227-¬33.
3. Thomas CJ, Kotze TJ. The palatal ruga pattern: a new classification. J Dent Assoc S Afr. 1983 Mar;38(3):153-7.
4. Harrison A. The palatal rugae in man. Proc Acad Nat Soc 1889;6:245.
5. English WR, Robison SF, Summitt JB, Oesterle LJ, Brannon RB, Morlang WM. Individuality of human palatal rugae. J Forensic Sci. 1988 May;33(3):718-26. [DOI:10.1520/JFS12479J]
6. Harchandani N, Marathe S, Rochani R, Nisa SU. Palatal Rugos-copy: A new era for forensic identification. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol 2015;27(3):393-8. [DOI:10.4103/0972-1363.170469]
7. Dwivedi N, Nagarajappa AK. Morphological analysis of palatal rugae pattern in central Indian population. J Int Soc Prevent Communit Dent 2016;6(5):417¬-22. [DOI:10.4103/2231-0762.192947] [PMID] [PMCID]
8. Surekha R, Anila K, Reddy VS, Hunasgi S, Ravikumar S, Ramesh N. Assessment of palatal rugae patterns in Manipuri and Kerala population. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2012 Jul;4(2):93-6. [DOI:10.4103/0975-1475.109896] [PMID] [PMCID]
9. Chandra S, Pandey V, Wasti A, Mangat SS, Bhagat JK, Singh R. Analysis of Rugae Pattern in Ranchi and Patna Population. J Int Oral Health 2016;8(3):362-6.
10. Paliwal A, Wanjari S, Parwani R. Palatal rugoscopy: Establishing identity. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2010 Jan;2(1):27-31. [DOI:10.4103/0974-2948.71054] [PMID] [PMCID]
11. Balgi P, Bhalekar B, Bhalerao K, Bhide E, Palaskar S,Kathuriya P. Study of palatal rugae pattern in gender identification. J Dent Allied Sci 2014;3(1):13-6. [DOI:10.4103/2277-4696.156519]
12. Alani MM, Thomas SA, Mathew S, Arakkal LJ, Thomas W, Reba PS. Analysis of rugae patterns and arch length in a central Kerala population: An original research. J Int Oral Health 2016;8(1):129-31.
13. Babu GS, Bharath TS, Kumar NG. Characteristics of palatal rugae patterns in west godavari population of India. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013 Oct;7(10):2356-9.
14. Krishnappa S, Srinath S, Bhardwaj P, Mallaya CH. Palatal rugoscopy: Implementation in forensic odontology - A review. J Adv Med Dent Sci. 2013; 1:53-9.
15. Jacob RF, Shalla CL. Postmortem identification of the edentu-lous deceased: denture tissue surface anatomy. J Forensic Sci. 1987 May;32(3):698-702. [DOI:10.1520/JFS12375J]
16. Jain A, Chowdhary R. Palatal rugae and their role in forensic odontology. J Investig Clin Dent. 2014 Aug;5(3):171-8. [DOI:10.1111/j.2041-1626.2013.00150.x] [PMID]
17. Almeida MA, Phillips C, Kula K, Tulloch C. Stability of the palatal rugae as landmarks for analysis of dental casts. Angle Orthod. 1995;65(1):43-8.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2023 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Research in Dental and Maxillofacial Sciences

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb