Volume 9, Issue 2 (6-2024)
J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci 2024, 9(2): 117-123 |
Back to browse issues page
Ethics code: IR.KMUS.REC.1400.836.
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Mafi S, Ghahremani F, Rahmani M, Alaee A. Validity and Reliability of the Persian Version of the Graded Chronic Pain Scale 2.0 for Determination of TMJ Pain. J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci 2024; 9 (2) :117-123
URL: http://jrdms.dentaliau.ac.ir/article-1-543-en.html
URL: http://jrdms.dentaliau.ac.ir/article-1-543-en.html
1- Oral Medicine Department, Islamic Azad University, Dental Branch, Tehran Iran.
2- Private Dentistry Practice, Kermanshah, Iran.
3- Oral Medicine Specialist, Kermanshah, Iran.
4- Oral Medicine Department, Dental Material Research Center, Islamic Azad University, Dental Branch, Tehran Iran. ,arezoo.alaee@yahoo.com
2- Private Dentistry Practice, Kermanshah, Iran.
3- Oral Medicine Specialist, Kermanshah, Iran.
4- Oral Medicine Department, Dental Material Research Center, Islamic Azad University, Dental Branch, Tehran Iran. ,
Abstract: (397 Views)
Background and Aim: The Graded Chronic Pain Scale version 2.0 (GCPS 2.0) has no Persian version for use on the Iranian population. Thus, this study aimed to validate the Persian version of this scale.
Materials and Methods: The cross-sectional study was conducted on 160 patients with chronic pain who filled out the GCPS 2.0. The 8-item self-report GCPS 2.0 was first translated to Persian. The validity of its Persian version was examined by a group of 7 expert specialists and calculation of the content validity index. The test-retest method was used to measure the reliability of the Persian version of GCPS 2.0. The Bartlett's test, KMO index, and exploratory factor analysis were used to confirm its construct validity. The internal consistency of the questions was analyzed by calculation of Cronbach's alpha coefficient and item-scale correlation coefficient, and retesting. The relationship between the questionnaire score and demographic information of the participants was analyzed (alpha=0.05).
Results: The content validity coefficient was 0.98. The test-retest coefficient was 0.98, indicating high reliability of the questionnaire. The mean age of the participants was 38 years, and 81 (50.6%) were males. Education was found to have a significant correlation with the total questionnaire score (P<0.05) but age had no such correlation (P>0.05).
Conclusion: The Persian version of the GCPS 2.0 with the omission of questions 1 and 5 may be used for assessment of chronic pain in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) area in the Iranian population.
Materials and Methods: The cross-sectional study was conducted on 160 patients with chronic pain who filled out the GCPS 2.0. The 8-item self-report GCPS 2.0 was first translated to Persian. The validity of its Persian version was examined by a group of 7 expert specialists and calculation of the content validity index. The test-retest method was used to measure the reliability of the Persian version of GCPS 2.0. The Bartlett's test, KMO index, and exploratory factor analysis were used to confirm its construct validity. The internal consistency of the questions was analyzed by calculation of Cronbach's alpha coefficient and item-scale correlation coefficient, and retesting. The relationship between the questionnaire score and demographic information of the participants was analyzed (alpha=0.05).
Results: The content validity coefficient was 0.98. The test-retest coefficient was 0.98, indicating high reliability of the questionnaire. The mean age of the participants was 38 years, and 81 (50.6%) were males. Education was found to have a significant correlation with the total questionnaire score (P<0.05) but age had no such correlation (P>0.05).
Conclusion: The Persian version of the GCPS 2.0 with the omission of questions 1 and 5 may be used for assessment of chronic pain in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) area in the Iranian population.
Keywords: Chronic pain, Facial pain, Pain measurement, Temporomandibular joint disorders, Reproducibility of results
Type of Study: Original article |
Subject:
Oral medicine
References
1. Teshima T, Zakrzewska JM, Potter R. A systematic review of screening diagnostic tools for trigeminal neuralgia. Br J Pain. 2023 Jun;17(3):255-66. [DOI:10.1177/20494637221146854] [PMID] []
2. Chang CL, Wang DH, Yang MC, Hsu WE, Hsu ML. Functional disorders of the temporomandibular joints: Internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2018 Apr;34(4):223-30. [DOI:10.1016/j.kjms.2018.01.004] [PMID]
3. Gębska M, Frąszczak M, Dalewski B, Kołodziej Ł. Qualitative and quantitative assessment of headaches in people with temporomandibular joint disorders: A pilot study. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2023 Oct;32(10):1193-9. [DOI:10.17219/acem/171821] [PMID]
4. Tanti I, Wira VVW, Pragustine Y, Himawan LS, Ariani N. Validation of the Indonesian version of the graded chronic pain scale 2.0 in pain-related temporomandibular disorders. Med J Indones. 2020 Mar;29(1):42-6. [DOI:10.13181/mji.oa.191790]
5. Gil-Martínez A, Paris-Alemany A, López-de-Uralde-Villanueva I, La Touche R. Management of pain in patients with temporomandibular disorder (TMD): challenges and solutions. J Pain Res. 2018 Mar 16;11:571-87. [DOI:10.2147/JPR.S127950] [PMID] []
6. Schiffman E, Ohrbach R, Truelove E, Look J, Anderson G, Goulet JP, et al. Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) for Clinical and Research Applications: recommendations of the International RDC/TMD Consortium Network* and Orofacial Pain Special Interest Group†. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2014 Winter;28(1):6-27. [DOI:10.11607/jop.1151] [PMID] []
7. Agha-Hosseini F, Mirzaii-Dizgah I, Shirazian S, Javaheri-Mahd M. Treating Parafunctional Habits for Alleviating Temporomandibular Disorder and Lower Back Pain: A Phase II Clinical Trial. Front Dent. 2023 May 2;20:11. [DOI:10.18502/fid.v20i11.12657] [PMID] []
8. Hietaharju M, Näpänkangas R, Sipilä K, et al. Importance of the Graded Chronic Pain Scale as a Biopsychosocial Screening Instrument in TMD Pain Patient Subtyping. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2021 Fall;35(4):303-16. [DOI:10.11607/ofph.2983] [PMID]
9. Whitten CE, Cristobal K. Chronic Pain is a Chronic Condition, Not Just a Symptom. Perm J. 2005 Summer;9(3):43-51. [DOI:10.7812/TPP/04-139]
10. Ferrer-Peña R, Gil-Martínez A, Pardo-Montero J, Jiménez-Penick V, Gallego-Izquierdo T, La Touche R. Adaptation and validation of the Spanish version of the graded chronic pain scale. Reumatol Clin. 2016 May-Jun;12(3):130-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.reumae.2015.07.003]
11. Tsang S, Royse CF, Terkawi AS. Guidelines for developing, translating, and validating a questionnaire in perioperative and pain medicine. Saudi J Anaesth. 2017 May;11(Suppl 1):S80-9. [DOI:10.4103/sja.SJA_203_17] [PMID] []
12. Ahmadi Tehrani E, Naimi SS, Khademi Kalantari KH, Akbarzadeh Baghebani A, Tavakolizadeh S. Cultural Adaptation and Content Validation of the Persian Version of the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders Axis I. J Rehab Med. 2018; 7(3): 133-40.
13. González Yoly, Miranda-Rivera Yaritza, Espinosa Irene. cross-cultural adaptation of research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders( (RDC/TMD). Rev Fac Odontol Univ Antioq. 2023;25(1):11-25.
14. Salaffi F, Stancati A, Grassi W. Reliability and validity of the Italian version of the Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire in patients with musculoskeletal disorders. Clin Rheumatol. 2006 Sep;25(5):619-31. [DOI:10.1007/s10067-005-0140-y] [PMID]
15. Von Korff M, DeBar LL, Krebs EE, Kerns RD, Deyo RA, Keefe FJ. Graded chronic pain scale revised: mild, bothersome, and high-impact chronic pain. Pain. 2020 Mar;161(3):651-61. [DOI:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001758] [PMID] []
16. Tedin Ng FN, Kadir K, Yusof ZYM. Reliability and Validity of the Malaysian English Version of the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorder (M-English DC/TMD). Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Feb 9;10(2):329. [DOI:10.3390/healthcare10020329] [PMID] []
17. Salaffi F, Sarzi-Puttini P, Atzeni F. How to measure chronic pain: New concepts. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2015 Feb;29(1):164-86. [DOI:10.1016/j.berh.2015.04.023] [PMID]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
