Volume 9, Issue 2 (6-2024)
J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci 2024, 9(2): 86-93 |
Back to browse issues page
Ethics code: IR.IAU.DENTAL.REC.1401.081
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
poorian B, Derhami H, Jafari F, Samadizadeh S, Bani Asad N. Comparison of the Impact of Chin Augmentation Treatments by Genioplasty versus Hyaluronic Acid Filler Injection on Facial Attractiveness of Patients with Mild to Moderate Microgenia. J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci 2024; 9 (2) :86-93
URL: http://jrdms.dentaliau.ac.ir/article-1-539-en.html
URL: http://jrdms.dentaliau.ac.ir/article-1-539-en.html
1- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2- Faculty of Dentistry, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
3- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. ,farbodjafari1373@gmail.com
4- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon, Private Practice, Tehran, Iran.
2- Faculty of Dentistry, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
3- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. ,
4- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon, Private Practice, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract: (416 Views)
Background and Aim: Sliding genioplasty is employed to correct a broad spectrum of chin abnormalities, encompassing horizontal and vertical augmentation and horizontal and vertical reduction. Injectable soft tissue fillers offer a less invasive alternative to genioplasty. This study aimed to compare the esthetic outcomes of chin augmentation using the abovementioned two methods.
Materials and Methods: This comparative interventional study enrolled 36 patients with mild to moderate microgenia presenting to the Department of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Islamic Azad University of Medical Sciences. They were candidates for chin contour correction through sliding genioplasty or hyaluronic acid filler injection (n=18 in each group). Photographs were obtained before and 3 months after genioplasty surgery and 1 month after filler injection. Subsequently, the images were evaluated by 10 oral and maxillofacial surgeons, 10 orthodontists, and 20 laypersons, using a visual analog scale (VAS) to appraise facial attractiveness after treatment. Comparisons were made by independent t-test (alpha=0.05).
Results: Orthodontists and oral and maxillofacial surgeons found no significant difference between the two methods in terms of facial aesthetics post-procedure (P>0.05). However, laypersons gave higher esthetic scores to genioplasty (P=0.02).
Conclusion: Based on the present results, orthodontists and oral and maxillofacial surgeons did not identify any significant difference in facial attractiveness between sliding genioplasty and hyaluronic acid filler injection. However, laypersons tended to rate genioplasty more favorably.
Type of Study: Original article |
Subject:
Oral & maxillofacial surgery
References
1. Sykes JM, Suárez GA. Chin Advancement, Augmentation, and Reduction as Adjuncts to Rhinoplasty. Clin Plast Surg. 2016 Jan;43(1):295-306. [DOI:10.1016/j.cps.2015.09.021] [PMID]
2. Chin OY, Sykes JM. Optimizing the Chin and Jawline Appearance: Does Surgery or Injection Make Sense? Facial Plast Surg. 2019 Apr;35(2):164-71. [DOI:10.1055/s-0039-1683962] [PMID]
3. Guyuron B. MOC-PS(SM) CME article: genioplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008 Apr;121(4 Suppl):1-7. [DOI:10.1097/01.prs.0000305931.98111.c3] [PMID]
4. Miles BA, Leach JL. Osseous genioplasty: Technical considerations. Oper Tech Otolayngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Sep;18(3):181-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.otot.2007.08.009]
5. Hartstein M, Fezza J. Chin Augmentation and Reshaping: Using Calcium Hydroxylapatite With Lidocaine (CaHA+) Filler. The American Journal of Cosmetic Surgery. 2020;37(3):124-30. [DOI:10.1177/0748806819897188]
6. Carruthers JDA, Glogau RG, Blitzer A; Facial Aesthetics Consensus Group Faculty. Advances in facial rejuvenation: botulinum toxin type a, hyaluronic acid dermal fillers, and combination therapies--consensus recommendations. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008 May;121(5 Suppl):5S-30S. [DOI:10.1097/PRS.0b013e31816de8d0] [PMID]
7. Raspaldo H. Volumizing effect of a new hyaluronic acid sub-dermal facial filler: a retrospective analysis based on 102 cases. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2008 Sep;10(3):134-42. [DOI:10.1080/14764170802154607] [PMID]
8. Garfein ES, Zide BM. Chin ptosis: classification, anatomy, and correction. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2008 Nov;1(1):1-14.
9. Jones D, Flynn TC. Hyaluronic acids: clinical applications. In: Jonas D, editor. Injectable Fillers: Principles and Practice. Oxford, United Kingdom: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.; 2010; pp. 158-74. [DOI:10.1002/9781444315004.ch12] []
10. Hoenig JF. Sliding osteotomy genioplasty for facial aesthetic balance: 10 years of experience. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2007 Jul-Aug;31(4):384-91. [DOI:10.1007/s00266-006-0177-6] [PMID]
11. Beer K, Kaufman-Janette J, Bank D, Biesman B, Dayan S, Kim W, Chawla S, Schumacher A. Safe and Effective Chin Augmentation With the Hyaluronic Acid Injectable Filler, VYC-20L. Dermatol Surg. 2021 Jan 1;47(1):80-5. [DOI:10.1097/DSS.0000000000002795] [PMID] []
12. Belmontesi M, Grover R, Verpaele A. Transdermal injection of Restylane SubQ for aesthetic contouring of the cheeks, chin, and mandible. Aesthet Surg J. 2006 Jan-Feb;26(1S):S28-34. [DOI:10.1016/j.asj.2005.10.002] [PMID]
13. Arnett GW, Jelic JS, Kim J, Cummings DR, Beress A, Worley CM Jr, Chung B, Bergman R. Soft tissue cephalometric analysis: diagnosis and treatment planning of dentofacial deformity. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999 Sep;116(3):239-53. [DOI:10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70234-9] [PMID]
14. Bertossi D, Robiony M, Lazzarotto A, Giampaoli G, Nocini R, Nocini PF. Nonsurgical Redefinition of the Chin and Jawline of Younger Adults With a Hyaluronic Acid Filler: Results Evaluated With a Grid System Approach. Aesthet Surg J. 2021 Aug 13;41(9):1068-76. [DOI:10.1093/asj/sjaa179] [PMID]
15. Kalin K, Iskender SY, Kuitert R. Attractiveness assessment by orthodontists and laypeople judging female profile modifications of Class II Division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021 Aug;160(2):276-282. [DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.04.032] [PMID]
16. Ren H, Chen X, Zhang Y. Correlation between facial attractiveness and facial components assessed by laypersons and orthodontists. J Dent Sci. 2021 Jan;16(1):431-6. [DOI:10.1016/j.jds.2020.07.012] [PMID] []
17. Shaw RB Jr, Katzel EB, Koltz PF, Kahn DM, Puzas EJ, Langstein HN. Facial bone density: effects of aging and impact on facial rejuvenation. Aesthet Surg J. 2012 Nov;32(8):937-42. [DOI:10.1177/1090820X12462865] [PMID]
18. Othman S, Cohn JE, Daggumati S, Bloom JD. The Impact of Dermal Fillers on Perceived Personality Traits and Attractiveness. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021 Feb;45(1):273-80. [DOI:10.1007/s00266-020-01888-8] [PMID]
19. Ogilvie P, Sattler G, Gaymans F, Belhaouari L, Weichman BM, Snow S, Chawla S, Abrams S, Schumacher A. Safe, Effective Chin and Jaw Restoration With VYC-25L Hyaluronic Acid Injectable Gel. Dermatol Surg. 2019 Oct;45(10):1294-303. [DOI:10.1097/DSS.0000000000001960] [PMID]
20. Naser mostofy S, Jalalian E, Valaie N, Mohtashamrad Z, Haeri A, Bitaraf T. Study of the Effect of GapSeal on Microgap and Microleakage in Internal Hex Connection After Cyclic Loading. J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci 2019; 4 (3) :36-42. [DOI:10.29252/jrdms.4.3.36]
21. Guo X, Zhao J, Song G, Zong X, Zhang D, Lai C, Jin X. Unexpected Bone Resorption in Mentum Induced by the Soft-Tissue Filler Hyaluronic Acid: A Preliminary Retrospective Cohort Study of Asian Patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Aug;146(2):147e-55e. [DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000006979] [PMID]
22. Shirinbak I, Basir Shabestari S. The evaluation and comparison of Advancement genioplasty and Chin Augmentation with alloplastic material. Journal of Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences. 2018; 25(3): 371-7.
23. Jones BM, Vesely MJ. Osseous genioplasty in facial aesthetic surgery--a personal perspective reviewing 54 patients. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;59(11):1177-87. [DOI:10.1016/j.bjps.2006.04.011] [PMID]
24. Khan M, Sattar N, Erkin M. Postoperative Complications in Genioplasty and Their Association with Age, Gender, and Type of Genioplasty. Int J Dent. 2021 Nov 17;2021:8134680. [DOI:10.1155/2021/8134680] [PMID] []
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
