Volume 9, Issue 3 (9-2024)                   J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci 2024, 9(3): 204-210 | Back to browse issues page

Ethics code: IR.IAU.DENTAL.REC.1399.035


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Sadrimanesh R, Aref P, Tavasoli-Hojjati S, Haghighat S. Esthetic Reconstruction of Primary Molars with Direct Composite Crown: One-Year Report of Five Cases. J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci 2024; 9 (3) :204-210
URL: http://jrdms.dentaliau.ac.ir/article-1-438-en.html
1- Private Dental Practice, Tehran, Iran.
2- Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. , parissa234@yahoo.com
3- Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract:   (100 Views)
Background and Aim: Dissatisfaction of parents with the appearance of conventional stainless-steel crowns (SSCs) has led the pedodontists to choose alternative esthetic restorations such as zirconia crowns.
Case Presentation: In this report, a new approach for fabrication of direct composite crowns for primary molars was described using dual-cure core build-up composite material in five patients with one-year follow-up.
Conclusion: Direct composite crown appears to be a suitable esthetic restoration for pulpotomized primary molars in cooperative patients with acceptable oral hygiene.
 
Full-Text [PDF 408 kb]   (41 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (11 Views)  
Type of Study: Case report | Subject: pediatric

References
1. Akhlaghi N, Hajiahmadi M, Golbidi M. Attitudes of Parents and Children toward Primary Molars Restoration with Stainless Steel Crown. Contemp Clin Dent. 2017 Jul-Sep;8(3):421-6. [DOI:10.4103/ccd.ccd_379_17] [PMID] []
2. Lopez-Cazaux S, Aiem E, Velly AM, Muller-Bolla M. Preformed pediatric zirconia crown versus preformed pediatric metal crown: study protocol for a randomized clinical trial. Trials. 2019 Aug 24;20(1):530. [DOI:10.1186/s13063-019-3559-1] [PMID] []
3. Rezvi FB, Mathew MG, Gurunathan D. Crowns in Pediatric Dentistry-A Review. Annals of RSCB . 2021;25(3):30-9.
4. Abdulhadi BS, Abdullah MM, Alaki SM, Alamoudi NM, Attar MH. Clinical Evaluation Between Zirconia Crowns and Stainless Crowns in Primary Molars Teeth. Journal of Pediatric Dentistry 2017; 5(1): 21-7. [DOI:10.4103/jpd.jpd_21_17]
5. Möhn M, Frankenberger R, Krämer N. Wear and marginal quality of aesthetic crowns for primary molars. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2022 Mar;32(2):273-83. [DOI:10.1111/ipd.12852] [PMID]
6. Nowak AJ. Pediatric Dentistry: Infancy Through Adolescence. 6th ed. USA: ELSEVIER; 2019. 634 P.
7. Rocha MCM, Inácio GC, Taira TM, Delgado RZR, Maciel SM, Frítola MJPDJ. Zirconia crowns as an esthetic alternative for oral rehabilitation in pediatric dentistry: A review. Pediatric Dental Journal. 2021;31(3):224-34. [DOI:10.1016/j.pdj.2021.07.001]
8. Guelmann M, Shapira J, Silva DR, Fuks AB. Esthetic restorative options for pulpotomized primary molars: a review of literature. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2011 Winter;36(2):123-6. [DOI:10.17796/jcpd.36.2.34h304265110137r] [PMID]
9. Chen X, Zhong J, Yan W, Zhang H, Jiang X, Huang Q, et al. Clinical performance of rensin-bonded composite strip crowns in primary incisors. Journal of Peking University Health Sciences 2020;52(5):907-12.
10. Grewal N, Jha S, Kaur N. Clinical and Radiographic Success of Resin-bonded Strip Crowns in Primary Incisors with Varying Extents of Sound Tooth Structure Available for Bonding. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021 Jul-Aug;14(4):454-61. [DOI:10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1984] [PMID] []
11. Garg V, Panda A, Shah J, Panchal P. Crowns in pediatric dentistry: A review. J Adv Med Dent Scie Res 2016;4(2):41-6.
12. Chen K, Lei Q, Xiong H, Chen Y, Luo W, Liang Y. A 2-year clinical evaluation of stainless steel crowns and composite resin restorations in primary molars under general anaesthesia in China's Guangdong province. Br Dent J. 2018 Jul 13;225(1):49-52. [DOI:10.1038/sj.bdj.2018.519] [PMID]
13. Chisini LA, Collares K, Cademartori MG, de Oliveira LJC, Conde MCM, Demarco FF, Corrêa MB. Restorations in primary teeth: a systematic review on survival and reasons for failures. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2018 Mar;28(2):123-39. [DOI:10.1111/ipd.12346] [PMID]
14. Mathew MG, Roopa KB, Soni AJ, Khan MM, Kauser A. Evaluation of Clinical Success, Parental and Child Satisfaction of Stainless Steel Crowns and Zirconia Crowns in Primary Molars. J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 Mar 26;9(3):1418-23. [DOI:10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1006_19] [PMID] []
15. Mohammadzadeh Z, Parisay I, Mehrabkhani M, Madani AS, Mazhari F. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced composite crowns in pulp-treated primary molars: 12-month results. Eur J Dent. 2016 Oct-Dec;10(4):522-8. [DOI:10.4103/1305-7456.195177] [PMID] []
16. Rai D, Bondarde P, Patil S, Mujawar S, Vishwakarma A, Gakhare R. Comparative Evaluation Of Fracture Resistance Of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored With Different Core Build-Up Materials: An Invitro Study. IOSR-JDMS. 2018;17(10):26-9.
17. Spinhayer L, Bui ATB, Leprince JG, Hardy CMF. Core build-up resin composites: an in-vitro comparative study. Biomater Investig Dent. 2020 Nov 3;7(1):159-66.. [DOI:10.1080/26415275.2020.1838283] [PMID] []
18. Zarow M, Dominiak M, Szczeklik K, Hardan L, Bourgi R, Cuevas-Suárez CE, et al. Effect of Composite Core Materials on Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies. Polymers (Basel). 2021 Jul 9;13(14):2251. [DOI:10.3390/polym13142251] [PMID] []
19. Bortolotto T, Melian K, Krejci I. Effect of dual-cure composite resin as restorative material on marginal adaptation of class 2 restorations. Quintessence Int. 2013 Oct;44(9):663-72.
20. Mathew MG, Roopa KB, Soni AJ, Khan MM, Kauser A. Evaluation of Clinical Success, Parental and Child Satisfaction of Stainless Steel Crowns and Zirconia Crowns in Primary Molars. J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 Mar 26;9(3):1418-23. [DOI:10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1006_19] [PMID] []
21. Itskovich R, Lewinstein I, Zilberman U. The Influence of Zinc Oxide Eugenol (ZOE) and Glass Ionomer (GI) Base Materials on the Microhardness of Various Composite and GI Restorative Materials. Open Dent J. 2014 Feb 7;8:13-9. [DOI:10.2174/1874210601408010013] [PMID] []
22. Choi SM, Choi YC, Park JH, Choi SC. The effect of etching time on the pattern of acid etching on the enamel of primary teeth. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent. 2008;35(3):437-45.
23. Tauböck TT, Bortolotto T, Buchalla W, Attin T, Krejci I. Influence of light-curing protocols on polymerization shrinkage and shrinkage force of a dual-cured core build-up resin composite. Eur J Oral Sci. 2010 Aug;118(4):423-9. [DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0722.2010.00746.x] [PMID]
24. Pan CY, Lan TH, Liu PH, Fu WR. Comparison of Different Cervical Finish Lines of All-Ceramic Crowns on Primary Molars in Finite Element Analysis. Materials (Basel). 2020 Mar 1;13(5):1094. [DOI:10.3390/ma13051094] [PMID] []
25. Dederichs M, Fahmy MD, Kuepper H, Guentsch A. Comparison of Gingival Retraction Materials Using a New Gingival Sulcus Model. J Prosthodont. 2019 Aug;28(7):784-9. [DOI:10.1111/jopr.13093] [PMID]
26. Loguercio AD, Luque-Martinez I, Lisboa AH, Higashi C, Queiroz VA, Rego RO, Reis A. Influence of Isolation Method of the Operative Field on Gingival Damage, Patients' Preference, and Restoration Retention in Noncarious Cervical Lesions. Oper Dent. 2015 Nov-Dec;40(6):581-93. [DOI:10.2341/14-089-C] [PMID]
27. Raskin A, Setcos JC, Vreven J, Wilson NH. Influence of the isolation method on the 10-year clinical behaviour of posterior resin composite restorations. Clin Oral Investig. 2000 Sep;4(3):148-52. [DOI:10.1007/s007840000069] [PMID]
28. Dede DÖ, Şahin O, Koroglu A, Yilmaz B. Effect of sealant agents on the color stability and surface roughness of nanohybrid composite resins. J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Jul;116(1):119-28. [DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.11.024] [PMID]
29. Yikilgan İ, Kamak H, Akgul S, Ozcan S, Bala O. Effects of three different bleaching agents on microhardness and roughness of composite sample surfaces finished with different polishing techniques. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017 Mar 1;9(3):e460-5. [DOI:10.4317/jced.53136] [PMID] []
30. Samer MS, Faraz Q, Al-Dubai SAR, Vohra F, Abdullah H, Taiyeb-Ali TB, Saub R. Clinical Outcomes and Predictors of Satisfaction in Patients with Improved Lithium Disilicate All-Ceramic Crowns. Med Princ Pract. 2017;26(5):470-9. [DOI:10.1159/000481864] [PMID] []
31. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Pulp therapy for primary and immature ermanent teeth. The Reference Manual of Pediatric Dentistry. Chicago, Ill.: American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry; 2021:399-407.
32. Jullien S. Prophylaxis of caries with fluoride for children under five years. BMC Pediatr. 2021;21(1):1-11. [DOI:10.1186/s12887-021-02702-3] [PMID] []
33. Bargale S, Davangere Padmanabh SK, Kariya PB, Shah S, Dave B. Knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding standardized treatment protocol for pulp therapy in deciduous dentition among general dental practitioners of Vadodara, Gujarat, India. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2019 Oct-Dec;37(4):327-2. [DOI:10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_186_19] [PMID]
34. Karpagam N, Mathew MG. Knowledge awareness and practice among parents regarding the usage of crowns in pediatric dentistry. Drug Invention Today. 2020;13(5):695-8.
35. Almohareb T, Alayed AA, Alzahrani KM, Maawadh AM, Almutairi B, Alhamdan RS, Bahkali A, Abduljabbar T, Vohra F. Influence of curing duration and mixing techniques of bulk fill resin composites on bi-axial flexural strength and degree of conversion. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater. 2020 Jan-Dec;18:2280800020975721. [DOI:10.1177/2280800020975721] [PMID]
36. Liberman J, Franzon R, Guimarães LF, Casagrande L, Haas AN, Araujo FB. Survival of composite restorations after selective or total caries removal in primary teeth and predictors of failures: A 36-months randomized controlled trial. J Dent. 2020 Feb;93:103268. [DOI:10.1016/j.jdent.2019.103268] [PMID]
37. Pummer A, Cieplik F, Nikolić M, Buchalla W, Hiller KA, Schmalz G. Longevity of posterior composite and compomer restorations in children placed under different types of anesthesia: a retrospective 5-year study. Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Jan;24(1):141-50. [DOI:10.1007/s00784-019-02911-2] [PMID]
38. Pires CW, Soldera EB, Bonzanini LIL, Lenzi TL, Soares FZM, Montagner AF, Rocha RO. Is Adhesive Bond Strength Similar in Primary and Permanent Teeth? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent. 2018;20(2):87-97.
39. Martínez-Carrasco CA, Nevárez-Rascón A, Soto-Barreras U. Comparative Evaluation of Bond Strength of Self-Etching and Total Etch Dental Adhesive Systems to Dentin of Deciduous and Permanent Teeth. Int. J. Odontostomat. 2020;14(1):55-9. [DOI:10.4067/S0718-381X2020000100055]
40. Ilie N, Schöner C, Bücher K, Hickel R. An in-vitro assessment of the shear bond strength of bulk-fill resin composites to permanent and deciduous teeth. J Dent. 2014 Jul;42(7):850-5. [DOI:10.1016/j.jdent.2014.03.013] [PMID]
41. Nemati Anaraki S, Kazemi H, GHafari Z, Naser Z, Bitaraf T. In-Vitro Comparative Study of the Effect of Four Finishing and Polishing Tools on Surface Roughness of a Microhybrid Resin Composite. Journal of Research in Dental and Maxillofacial Sciences. 2019;4 (2):26-31. [DOI:10.29252/jrdms.4.2.26]
42. Tedesco TK, Soares FZ, Grande RH, Filho LE, Rocha Rde O. Effect of cariogenic challenge on bond strength of adhesive systems to sound and demineralized primary and permanent enamel. J Adhes Dent. 2014 Oct;16(5):421-8.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Research in Dental and Maxillofacial Sciences

Designed & Developed by: Yektaweb