Volume 7, Issue 4 (10-2022)                   J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci 2022, 7(4): 194-201 | Back to browse issues page

Ethics code: IR.RUMS.REC.1400.019


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Rafiei M, Moradi Askari E, Sadeghi M, Mollahasani kahdouyi M, Zeini N. Materials, Methods, and Equipment used by General Dentists of Southeastern Iran for Endodontic Treat-ment. J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci 2022; 7 (4) :194-201
URL: http://jrdms.dentaliau.ac.ir/article-1-396-en.html
1- Student Research Committee, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran
2- Endodontics Department, School of Dentistry, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran
3- Restorative Dentistry Department, School of Dentistry, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran
4- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran
5- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran , negarzeini@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (183 Views)
Background and Aim: The present study aimed to evaluate the materials, methods, and equipment used by general dentists in southeastern Iran for endodontic treatments in 2021.  
Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 121 standard questionnaires were distributed among general dentists in Rafsanjan city, Iran. The questionnaire included demographics and questions regarding the type of materials, methods, and equipment selected by general dentists. The collected data were analyzed by SPSS version 22 using the Chi-square test and ANOVA.
Results: The response rate of the participants was 83%(n=100); of which, 55% were females and 45% were males. Only 28% of dentists performed pulp vitality tests, and 46% performed sinus tract tracing in case of infection. Cotton rolls were used by 71% for further isolation, apex locator and radiography were used concurrently to determine the working length by 62%, and canal preparation was done by rotary and manual files by 48%. Rotary M3 and ProTaper files were more commonly used by dentists. Electric rotary handpieces were used for canal instrumentation by 64%, and rotary orifice shapers were more commonly used for canal flaring (61%). The most commonly used obturation method was lateral compaction. Most general dentists used formocresol-impregnated cotton pellets for pulpotomy (43%). Half of the dentists used saline for canal irrigation. Calcium hydroxide was the most commonly used intracanal medicament (87%), and 53% used polymerized sealers.
Conclusion: General dentists evaluated in this study violated some of the standards and need to take more training courses.  
Full-Text [PDF 757 kb]   (103 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (66 Views)  
Type of Study: Original article | Subject: Endodontics

References
1. Ravanshad S, Sahraei S, Khayat A. Survey of Endodontic Prac-tice amongst Iranian Dentists Participating Restorative Dentis-try Congress in Shiraz, November 2007. Iran Endod J. 2008 Win-ter;2(4):135-42.
2. Raoof M, Heidaripour M, Shahravan A, Haghani J, Afkham A, Razifar M, Mohammadizadeh S. General Dental Practitioners' Concept towards Using Radiography and Apex-Locators in Endodontics. Iran Endod J. 2014 Fall ;9(4): 277-82.
3. Koçak MM, Darendeliler-Yaman S. Sealing ability of lateralcompaction and tapered single cone gutta-percha techniques in root canals prepared with stainless steel and rotary nickel tita-nium instruments. J Clin Exp Dent. 2012 Jul 1;4(3):e156-9. [DOI:10.4317/jced.50752] [PMID] [PMCID]
4. Unal GC, Kaya BU, Tac AG, Kececi AD. Survey of attitudes, ma-terials and methods preferred in root canal therapy by general dental practice in Turkey: Part 1. Eur J Dent. 2012 Oct;6(4):376-84. [DOI:10.1055/s-0039-1698975] [PMID] [PMCID]
5. Alley BS, Kitchens GG, Alley LW, Eleazer PD. A comparison of survival of teeth following endodontic treatment performed by general dentists or by specialists. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004 Jul;98(1):115-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.01.004] [PMID]
6. Savani GM, Sabbah W, Sedgley CM, Whitten B. Current trends in endodontic treatment by general dental practitioners: report of a United States national survey. J Endod. 2014 May;40(5):618-24. [DOI:10.1016/j.joen.2014.01.029] [PMID]
7. Akhlaghi N, Nourbakhsh N, Khademi A, Karimi L. General Dental Practitioners' Knowledge about the Emergency Management of Dental Trauma. Iran Endod J. 2014 Fall;9(4): 251-6.
8. Weisleder R, Yamauchi S, Caplan DJ, Trope M, Teixeira FB. The validity of pulp testing: a clinical study. J Am Dent Assoc. 2009 Aug;140(8):1013-7. [DOI:10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0312] [PMID]
9. Asgary S, Shadman B, Ghalamkarpour Z, Shahravan A, Ghod-dusi J, Bagherpour A, Akbarzadeh Baghban A,Hashemipour M, Ghasemian Pour M. Periapical Status and Quali-ty of Root canal Fillings and Coronal Restorations in Iranian Population. Iran Endod J. 2010 Spring;5(2):74-82.
10. Raoof M, Zeini N, Haghani J, Sadr S, Mohammadalizadeh S. Preferred materials and methods employed for endodontic treatment by Iranian general practitioners. Iran Endod J. 2015;10(2):112-6.
11. Ahmadi H, Ebrahimi A, Ghorbani F. The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on dental practice in Iran: A questionnaire-based report. BMC oral health. 2020 Dec;20(1):1-9. [DOI:10.1186/s12903-020-01341-x] [PMID] [PMCID]
12. Spagnuolo G, De Vito D, Rengo S, Tatullo M. COVID-19 Out-break: An Overview on Dentistry. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 22;17(6):2094. [DOI:10.3390/ijerph17062094] [PMID] [PMCID]
13. Akbarialiabad H, Rastegar A, Bastani B. How Sanctions Have Impacted Iranian Healthcare Sector: A Brief Review. Arch Iran Med. 2021;24(1):58-63. [DOI:10.34172/aim.2021.09] [PMID]
14. Alanazi MH, Barnawi NI, Almohaimel SA, Almutairi MA, Alanezi OK, Qureshi LW, Sangoura SI, Alkholeef FJ, Shahadah RF. Evaluation of Dental Pulp Testing: Simple LiteratureReview. Arch Pharm Pract. 2019;10(3):37-40.
15. Csinszka K, Ivácson A, Monica M, Mihai P, Aurita AS, Angela B. Prevalence of rubber dam usage among dental practitioners and final year students in Tirgu Mures: A questionnaire survey. Acta Medica Marisiensis. 2015;61(3):188-91. [DOI:10.1515/amma-2015-0059]
16. Whitten BH, Gardiner DL, Jeansonne BG, Lemon RR. Current trends in endodontic treatment: report of a national survey. J Am Dent Assoc. 1996 Sep;127(9):1333-41. [DOI:10.14219/jada.archive.1996.0444] [PMID]
17. Zou H, Li Y, Lian X, Yan Y, Dai X, Wang G. Frequency and Influ-encing Factors of Rubber Dam Usage in Tianjin: A Questionnaire Survey. Int J Dent. 2016;2016:7383212. [DOI:10.1155/2016/7383212] [PMID] [PMCID]
18. Kolyaei E, Nasrollahi E, Safari R, Bashiri M, Rastegar-Khosravi M. Use of rubber dam among dentists work-ing in the west part of Iran. JOHOE. 2014;3(2):53-7.
19. European Society of Endodontology. Quality guidelines for endodontic treatment: consensus report of the European Socie-ty of Endodontology. Int Endod J. 2006 Dec;39(12):921-30. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01180.x] [PMID]
20. Kapitán M, Sustová Z. The use of rubber dam among Czech dental practitioners. Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove). 2011;54(4):144-8. [DOI:10.14712/18059694.2016.38]
21. Mohammed A, Sharanbir K, Sidhu SK, Chong BS. Root canal working length determination and apical limit of root canal instrumentation and obturation. ENDO. 2015; 9(3): 161-8.
22. Keratiotis G, Kournetas N, Agrafioti A, Kontakiotis EG. A comparative evaluation of two working length determination methods. Aust Endod J. 2019 Dec;45(3):331-6. [DOI:10.1111/aej.12321] [PMID]
23. Elham FG, Sedigheh Z. The use of instruments by Iranian endodontics and general practioners. Open Dent J. 2012; 6: 105-10. [DOI:10.2174/1874210601206010105] [PMID] [PMCID]
24. Bishop K, Dummer PM. A comparison of stainless steel Flexofiles and nickel-titanium NiTiFlex files during the shaping of simulated canals. Int Endod J. 1997 Jan;30(1):25-34. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2591.1997.tb01095.x] [PMID]
25. Lokhande PR, Deenadayalan, Ghorpade RR, Srinidhi SR. A review of contemporary research on root canal obturation and related quality assessment techniques. InnovativeDesign, Analysis and Development Practices in Aerospace and Automotive Engineering. 2019; 1:511-25.
26. Stringhini Junior E, Vitcel ME, Oliveira LB. Evidence of pulpo-tomy in primary teeth comparing MTA, calcium hydroxide, ferric sulphate, and electrosurgery with formocresol. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2015 Aug;16(4):303-12. [DOI:10.1007/s40368-015-0174-z] [PMID]
27. Clarkson R, Podlich H, Savage N, Moule A. A survey of sodi-um hypochlorite use by general dental practitioners and endo-dontists in Australia. Aust Dent J. 2003;48(1):20-6. [DOI:10.1111/j.1834-7819.2003.tb00004.x] [PMID]
28. Chong BS, Pitt Ford TR. The role of intracanal medication in root canal treatment. Int Endod J. 1992 Mar;25(2):97-106. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2591.1992.tb00743.x] [PMID]
29. Al-Omari WM. Survey of attitudes, materials and methods employed in endodontic treatment by general dental practitioners in North Jordan. BMC Oral Health. 2004 Sep 10;4(1):1. [DOI:10.1186/1472-6831-4-1] [PMID] [PMCID]
30. Slaus G, Bottenberg P. A survey of endodontic practice amongst Flemish dentists. Int Endod J. 2002 Sep;35(9):759-67. [DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00564.x] [PMID]
31. Kaptan RF, Haznedaroglu F, Kayahan MB, Basturk FB. An investigation of current endodontic practice in Turkey.ScientificWorldJournal. 2012;2012:565413. [DOI:10.1100/2012/565413] [PMID] [PMCID]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2022 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Research in Dental and Maxillofacial Sciences

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb