Volume 7, Issue 3 (7-2022)                   J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci 2022, 7(3): 148-154 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Veljanovski D, Stefanovikj B, Bogdanovski M, Stojkova M, Krstevski D. Effect of a Bone Replacement Material on Vertical Bone Level Alterations around Immediately Placed Mandibular Molar Implants. J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci 2022; 7 (3) :148-154
URL: http://jrdms.dentaliau.ac.ir/article-1-379-en.html
1- Clinic for Oral Surgery “Hami Optimum”, Skopje, N. Macedonia , darkoveljanovski@gmail.com
2- Dental practice “Optimum Dental”, Skopje, N. Macedonia
3- Dental practice “Molar”, Skopje, N. Macedonia
4- Dental practice “Lukanovski”, Skopje, N. Macedonia
5- Dental practice “Stela”, Skopje, N. Macedonia
Abstract:   (350 Views)
Background and Aim: Immediate implant placement is a predictable therapeutic option to replace the missing teeth. However, it is technique-sensitive, and requires strict case selection criteria. Tooth extraction triggers the biologic phenomenon of bone resorption, which is not prevented with immediate implant placement. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) use on vertical bone loss around immediately placed mandibular molar implants.  
Materials and Methods: In this non-randomized clinical study, 14 patients with immediate molar implants in the lower jaw, restored with screw-retained single crowns were evaluated. The case group (with bone material use) received DBBM in conjunction with implant placement, while no grafting was performed in the control group. The vertical bone level changes were radiographically measured at the mesial and distal implant sides as the distance between the implant shoulder and first implant-bone contact in apical direction. Measurements were made at two time points of six months postoperatively and one year post-functional loading. The acquired data were statistically analyzed using two-way ANOVA.
Results: The mean values for vertical bone loss at the mesial and distal reference points were greater in the control group (without bone replacement material use) than in the case group both six months postoperatively and one year post-functional loading. The difference was statistically significant at both time points (P<0.05).
Conclusion: Within the limitation of this study, it can be concluded that the use of DBBM in immediate implants can reduce vertical bone loss.  
Full-Text [PDF 806 kb]   (172 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (102 Views)  
Type of Study: Original article | Subject: Periodontology

1. Canullo L, Iurlaro G, Iannello G. Double-blind randomized controlled trial study on post-extraction immediately restored implants using the switching platform concept: soft tissue response. Preliminary report. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Apr;20(4):414-20. [DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01660.x] [PMID]
2. Pieri F, Aldini NN, Marchetti C, Corinaldesi G. Influence of implant-abutment interface design on bone and soft tissue levels around immediately placed and restored single-tooth implants: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Jan-Feb;26(1): 169-78.
3. Shanelec DA, Tibbetts LS. Implant microsurgery: Immediate implant placement with implant-supported provisional. Clin. adv. periodontics. 2011 Mar;1(3):161-72. [DOI:10.1902/cap.2011.110040]
4. Degidi M, Nardi D, Daprile G, Piattelli A. Buccal bone plate in the immediately placed and restored maxillary single implant: a 7-year retrospective study using computed tomography. Implant Dent. 2012 Feb;21(1):62-6. [DOI:10.1097/ID.0b013e31823fce9f] [PMID]
5. Kinaia BM, Shah M, Neely AL, Goodis HE. Crestal bone level changes around immediately placed implants: a systematic review and meta-analyses with at least 12 months' follow-up after functional loading. J Periodontol. 2014 Nov;85(11): 1537-48. [DOI:10.1902/jop.2014.130722] [PMID]
6. Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Sclar A, Lozada JL. Effects of the facial osseous defect morphology on gingival dynamics after immediate tooth replacement and guided bone regeneration: 1-year results. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Jul; 65(7 Suppl 1):13-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.joms.2007.04.006] [PMID]
7. Saito H, Chu SJ, Reynolds MA, Tarnow DP. Provisional Restorations Used in Immediate Implant Placement Provide a Platform to Promote Peri-implant Soft Tissue Healing: A Pilot Study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2016 Jan-Feb;36(1):47-52. [DOI:10.11607/prd.1945] [PMID]
8. Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, Karring T. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003 Aug;23(4):313-23.
9. Hämmerle CH, Araújo MG, Simion M; Osteology Consensus Group 2011. Evidence-based knowledge on the biology and treatment of extraction sockets. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Feb;23 Suppl 5:80-2. [DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02370.x] [PMID]
10. Weng D, Stock V, Schliephake H. Are socket and ridge preservation techniques at the day of tooth extraction efficient in maintaining the tissues of the alveolar ridge? Systematic review, consensus statements and recommendations of the 1st DGI Consensus Conference in September 2010, Eur. J. Oral Implantol. 2011 Feb;4(1): 459-66.
11. Araújo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 2005 Feb;32(2):212-8. [DOI:10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00642.x] [PMID]
12. Ferrus J, Cecchinato D, Pjetursson EB, Lang NP, Sanz M, Lindhe J. Factors influencing ridge alterations following immediate implant placement into extraction sockets. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Jan;21(1):22-9. [DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01825.x] [PMID]
13. Botticelli D, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Resolution of bone defects of varying dimension and configuration in the marginal portion of the peri-implant bone. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 2004 Apr;31(4):309-17. [DOI:10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00502.x] [PMID]
14. Maiorana C, Beretta M, Salina S, Santoro F. Reduction of autogenous bone graft resorption by means of bio-oss coverage: a prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2005 Feb;25(1):19-25.
15. Araújo M, Linder E, Lindhe J. Effect of a xenograft on early bone formation in extraction sockets: an experimental study in dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Jan;20(1):1-6. [DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01606.x] [PMID]
16. Smith RB, Tarnow DP. Classification of molar extraction sites for immediate dental implant placement: technical note. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 May-Jun;28(3): 911-6. [DOI:10.11607/jomi.2627] [PMID]
17. Linkevicius T. Zero Bone Loss Concepts. Illustrated ed. Batavia, IL: Quintessence Pub Co; 2019. 304 p.
18. De Angelis P, Manicone PF, Gasparini G, De Angelis S, Liguori MG, De Filippis I, et al. Influence of Immediate Implant Placement and Provisionalization with or without Soft Tissue Augmentation on Hard and Soft Tissues in the Esthetic Zone: A One-Year Retrospective Study. Biomed Res Int. 2021 Jan 5;2021:8822804. [DOI:10.1155/2021/8822804] [PMID] [PMCID]
19. Girlanda FF, Feng HS, Corrêa MG, Casati MZ, Pimentel SP, Ribeiro FV, Cirano FR. Deproteinized bovine bone derived with collagen improves soft and bone tissue outcomes in flapless immediate implant approach and immediate provisionalization: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Oct;23(10):3885-93. [DOI:10.1007/s00784-019-02819-x] [PMID]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2023 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Research in Dental and Maxillofacial Sciences

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb