Volume 8, Issue 1 (1-2023)
J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci 2023, 8(1): 38-42 |
Back to browse issues page
Ethics code: do not have ethic code
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Ruhollahi M, Talaeipour A, Tour Savadkouh S, Roghanizad N. Centering Ability of F6 SkyTaper and RaCe Rotary Files: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study. J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci 2023; 8 (1) :38-42
URL: http://jrdms.dentaliau.ac.ir/article-1-376-en.html
URL: http://jrdms.dentaliau.ac.ir/article-1-376-en.html
1- Endodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2- Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3- Endodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran , nr686@yahoo.com
2- Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3- Endodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran , nr686@yahoo.com
Abstract: (741 Views)
| Background and Aim: Maintaining the original shape and path of the canal is among the most important criteria for optimal root canal preparation. The aim of this study was to compare the centering ability of F6 SkyTaper and RaCe rotary files in mesiobuccal canals of mandibular molars. Materials and Methods: In this experimental study, 30 mesiobuccal canals of extracted human mandibular molars with 25-30-degree curvature were randomly divided into two experimental groups (n=15) of RaCe and F6 SkyTaper. After mounting of the teeth in a putty mold, the distance between the canal walls and the outer surface of the roots in mesial and distal aspects was measured. The measurements were made at 1, 3 and 7 mm from the apex. Initial glide path in the canals was achieved using a # 15 K-file. Then, the canals in group A were prepared by RaCe rotary file #25/6% while the canals in group B were prepared by F6 Sky Taper rotary file #25/6%. Measurements were repeated and the difference between the two measurements was calculated and compared with the Mann-Whitney U test. Results: The mean centering ability was 0.72 ± 0.62 in the RaCe group and 0.95 ± 1.39 in F6 SkyTaper group. the centrality was better in F6 SkyTaper group (it was closer to 1) but the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.4). Conclusion: Both RaCe and F6 SkyTaper rotary systems partially offset the centrality of the root canal system. |
Type of Study: Original article |
Subject:
Endodontics
References
1. Sousa-Neto MD, Silva-Sousa YC, Mazzi-Chaves JF, Carvalho KKT, Barbosa AFS, Versiani MA, Jacobs R, Leoni GB. Root canal preparation using micro-computed tomography analysis: a literature review. Braz Oral Res 2018;32(suppl 1):e66. [DOI:10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0066]
2. Mamede-Neto I, Borges AH, Guedes OA, de Oliveira D, Pedro FL, Estrela C. Root Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instruments in Mandibular Premolars Assessed Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography. Open Dent J 2017;11:71-8.
3. Zuolo ML, Zaia AA, Belladonna FG, Silva EJNL, Souza EM, Ver-siani MA, Lopes RT, De-Deus G. Micro-CT assessment of the shaping ability of four root canal instrumentation systems in oval-shaped canals. Int Endod J 2018;51(5):564-71. [DOI:10.1111/iej.12810] [PMID]
4. Sarraf P, Kiomarsi N, Taheri FH, Moghaddamzade B, Dibaji F, Kharazifard MJ. Apical Transportation of Mesiobuccal Canals of Maxillary Molars Following Root Canal Preparation with Two Rotary Systems and Hand Files: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomo-graphic Assessment. Front Dent. 2019; 16 (4):272-8. [DOI:10.18502/fid.v14i4.2086] [PMID] [PMCID]
5. Bürklein S, Jäger PG, Schäfer E. Apical transportation and canal straightening with different continuously tapered rotary file systems in severely curved root canals: F6 SkyTaper and OneShape versus Mtwo. Int Endod J 2017; 50 (10):983-90. [DOI:10.1111/iej.12716] [PMID]
6. Khalilak Z, Sattarian I, Tour Savadkouhi S. Ex-Vivo Comparison of the Dentin Removal Ability of One Shape and F6 SkyTaper Rotary Files. J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci 2019; 4 (4):6-10. [DOI:10.29252/jrdms.4.4.6]
7. Canga M, Malagnino I, Malagnino G, Malagnino V. A Comparison of Mtwo and RaCe Rotary Instruments in the Prep-aration of Curved Canals. J Contemp Dent Pract 2020; 21(2):124-8. [DOI:10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2751] [PMID]
8. Mesgarani A, Hamidi MR, Haghanifar S, Naiemi S, Bijani A. Comparison of apical transportation and centering ability of Mtwo and Reciproc R25 in severely curved canals using cone-beam computed tomography. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2018;15(1):57-62. [DOI:10.4103/1735-3327.223620] [PMID] [PMCID]
9. Hartmann RC, Fensterseifer M, Peters OA, de Figueiredo JAP, Gomes MS, Rossi-Fedele G. Methods for measurement of root canal curvature: a systematic and critical review. Int Endod J 2019;52(2):169-80. [DOI:10.1111/iej.12996] [PMID]
10. Rejula F, Christalin R, Ahmed W, Dinakaran S, Gopinathan AS, Babu A. Measure and compare the Degree of Root Canal Transportation and Canal-centering ability of Twist-ed, ProTaper, and Conventional Stainless Steel K Files using Spiral Computed Tomography: An in vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2017;18(6):463-9.
11. Estrela C, Pécora JD, Estrela CRA, Guedes OA, Silva BSF, Soa-res CJ, Sousa-Neto MD. Common Operative Procedural Errors and Clinical Factors Associated with Root Canal Treatment. Braz Dent J 2017;28(2):179-90. [DOI:10.1590/0103-6440201702451] [PMID]
12. Keles A, Keskin C. Deviations of Mesial Root Canals of Man-dibular First Molar Teeth at the Apical Third: A Micro-computed Tomographic Study. J Endod 2018; 44(6): 1030-2. [DOI:10.1016/j.joen.2018.02.028] [PMID]
13. Ceyhanli KT, Erdilek N, Tatar I, Cetintav B. Comparative micro-computed tomography evaluation of apical root canal transportation with the use of ProTaper, RaCe and Safesider systems in human teeth. Aust Endod J 2014;40(1):12-6. [DOI:10.1111/aej.12014] [PMID]
14. Delgoshayi N, Abbasi M, Bakhtiar H, Sakhdari S, Ghannad S, Ellini MR. Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of ProTa-per and SafeSider in Preparation of Curved Root Canals: A CBCT Evaluation. Iran Endod J 2018;13(2):240-5.
15. Kaval ME, Capar ID, Ertas H, Sen BH. Comparative evaluation of cyclic fatigue resistance of four different nickel-titanium rotary files with different cross-sectional designs and alloy properties. Clin Oral Investig 2017;21(5):1527-30. [DOI:10.1007/s00784-016-1917-x] [PMID]
16. Troiano G, Dioguardi M, Cocco A, Zhurakivska K, Ciavarella D, Muzio LL. Increase in [corrected] the glyde path diameter improves the centering ability of F6 Skytaper. Eur J Dent. 2018;12(1):89-93. [DOI:10.4103/ejd.ejd_231_17] [PMID] [PMCID]
17. Sajad M, Misgar OH, Farooq R, Purra AR, Ahangar FA. Evaluation of canal centering ability after preparation with f6 Sky Taper single continuous file systems with or without glide path files. Int J Appl Dent Sci. 2018;4(1):25-8.
18. Azim AA, Wang HH, Tarrosh M, Azim KA, Piasecki L. Com-parison between Single-file Rotary Systems: Part 1-Efficiency, Effectiveness, and Adverse Effects in Endodontic Retreatment. J Endod. 2018;44(11):1720-4. [DOI:10.1016/j.joen.2018.07.022] [PMID]
19. Aminsobhani M, Ghorbanzadeh A, Dehghan S, Niasar AN, Kharazifard MJ. A comparison of canal preparations by Mtwo and RaCe rotary files using full sequence versus one rotary file techniques; a cone-beam computed tomography analysis. Saudi Endod J. 2014;4:70-6. [DOI:10.4103/1658-5984.132722]
20. Fidler A, Plotino G, Kuralt M. A Critical Review of Methods for Quantitative Evaluation of Root Canal Transportation. J Endod. 2021 May;47(5):721-31. [DOI:10.1016/j.joen.2021.02.002] [PMID]
21. Hasheminia SM, Farhad A, Sheikhi M, Soltani P, Hendi SS, Ahmadi M. Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Analysis of Ca-nal Transportation and Centering Ability of Single-file Systems. J Endod 2018;44(12):1788-91. [DOI:10.1016/j.joen.2018.09.011] [PMID]
22. Koring S, Schwahn C, Kocher T, Steffen H. Shaping ability of five different nickel-titanium systems in simulated S-shaped canals. Endo EPT 2020;14(2):135-43.
23. Thota MM, Kakollu S, Duvvuri M, Garikapati RB. Compari-tive evaluation of canal shaping ability of three nickel titanium instrument systems using cone beam computed tomography: An in vitro study. Endodontology 2017; 29(2): 120-24. [DOI:10.4103/endo.endo_17_17]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
