[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
:: Volume 3, Issue 3 (Journal of Research in Dental & Maxillofacial Sciences Summer 2018) ::
J Res Dentomaxillofac Sci 2018, 3(3): 27-32 Back to browse issues page
Comparison of Tubular Penetration of AH26, EasySeal, and SureSeal Root Canal Sealers in Single-Rooted Teeth Using Scanning Electron Microscopy
S Toursavadkohi1, F Zameni * 2, M Afkar1
1- , Endodontics Dept, Faculty of Dentistry, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2- Dentist , zameni.fatemeh@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (249 Views)

Background and Aim: Tubular penetration of root canal sealers prevents filling material displacement and overgrowth of microorganisms in dentinal tubules. The aim of this study was to compare the tubular penetration of AH26, EasySeal, and SureSeal sealers in single-rooted teeth using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
Materials and Methods: Fifty human single-rooted teeth were included in this experimental study. After root canal preparation, AH26 was used in group 1, EasySeal was used in group 2, and SureSeal was used in group 3 using the lateral condensation technique. Sections at 3 mm and 6 mm from the apex were prepared and subjected to SEM analysis. Analysis of variance (ANOVA), post hoc and paired t-tests were used to compare the deepest dentinal penetration of root canal sealers.
Results: The deepest tubular penetration at 3 mm from the apex was 0.85±0.19 mm in group 1, 1.32±0.21 mm in group 2, and 1.17±0.42 mm in group 3; the difference was significant (P=0.01). The deepest tubular penetration at 6 mm from the apex was 1.09±0.3 mm in group 1, 2.12±0.45 mm in group 2, and 1.88±0.43 mm in group 3; the difference was significant (P=0.0001). The mean deepest tubular penetration was lower at 3 mm from the apex compared to the penetration at 6 mm from the apex (P=0.02).
Conclusion: It seems that tubular penetration of AH26 sealer is less than that of EasySeal and SureSeal at 3-mm and 6-mm sections.

Keywords: Epoxy Resin-Based Root Canal Sealer, Dentin, Root Canal Preparation, Root Canal Filling Materials, Scanning Electron Microscopy, Tooth Root
Full-Text [PDF 621 kb]   (138 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (9 Views)  
Type of Study: Original article |
* Corresponding Author Address: Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
1. Pawar SS, Pujar MA, Makandar SD. Evaluation of the apical sealing ability of bioceramic sealer, AH plus & epiphany: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2014 Nov-Dec;17(6):579-82.
2. Kwang S, Abbott P. The presence and distribution of bacteria in dentinal tubules of root filled teeth. Int Endod J. 2014 Jun;47(6):600-10.
3. Kumar NS, Palanivelu A, Narayanan LL. Evaluation of the apical sealing ability and adaptation to the dentin of two resin-based Sealers: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2013 Sep;16(5):449-53.
4. Kuçi A, Alaçam T, Yavaş Ö, Ergul-Ulger Z, Kayaoglu G. Sealer penetration into dentinal tubules in the presence or absence of smear layer: a confocal laser scanning microscopic study. J Endod. 2014 Oct;40(10):1627-31.
5. Turkel E, Onay EO, Ungor M. Comparison of Three Final Irrigation Activation Techniques: Effects on Canal Cleanness, Smear Layer Removal, and Dentinal Tubule Penetration of Two Root Canal Sealers. Photomed Laser Surg. 2017 Dec;35(12):672-81.
6. Khader MA. An In Vitro Scanning Electron Microscopy Study to Evaluate the Dentinal Tubular Penetration Depth of Three Root Canal Sealers. J Int Oral Health. 2016;8(2):191-4.
7. Al-Haddad A, Abu Kasim NH, Che Ab Aziz ZA. Interfacial adaptation and thickness of bioceramic-based root canal sealers. Dent Mater J. 2015;34(4):516-21.
8. Macedo LMD, Silva-Sousa Y, Silva SRCD, Baratto SSP, Baratto-Filho F, Abi Rached-Júnior FJ. Influence of Root Canal Filling Techniques on Sealer Penetration and Bond Strength to Dentin. Braz Dent J. 2017 May-Jun;28(3):380-84.
9. Machado R, Silva Neto UX, Carneiro E, Fariniuk LF, Westphalen VP, Cunha RS. Lack of correlation between tubular dentine cement penetration, adhesiveness and leakage in roots filled with gutta percha and an endodontic cement based on epoxy amine resin. J Appl Oral Sci. 2014 JanFeb;22(1):22-8.
10. Rouhani A, Ghoddusi J, Naghavi N, Al-Lawati G. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of dentinal tubule penetration of Epiphany in severely curved root canals. Eur J Dent. 2013Oct;7(4):423-8.
11. Mokhtari H, Shahi S, Janani M, Reyhani MF, Mokhtari Zonouzi HR, Rahimi S, et al. Evaluation of apical leakage in root canals obturated with three different sealers in presence or absence of smear layer. Iran Endod J. 2015 Mar;10(2):131-4.
12. Sonntag D, Ritter A, Burkhart A, Fischer J, Mondrzyk A, Ritter H. Experimental amineepoxide sealer: a physicochemical study in comparison with AH Plus and EasySeal. Int Endod J. 2015 Aug;48(8):747-56.
13. Huang Y, Celikten B, de Faria Vasconcelos K, Ferreira Pinheiro Nicolielo L, Lippiatt N, Buyuksungur A, et al. Micro-CT and nano-CT analysis of filling quality of three different endodontic sealers. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2017 Dec;46(8):20170223.
14. Deniz Sungur D, Purali N, Coşgun E, Calt S. Push-out bond strength and dentinal tubule penetration of different root canal sealers used with coated core materials. Restor Dent Endod. 2016 May;41(2):114-20.
15. Wiesse PEB, Silva-Sousa YT, Pereira RD, Estrela C, Domingues LM, Pécora JD, et al. Effect of ultrasonic and sonic activation of root canal sealers on the push facial adaptation to root canal dentine. Int Endod J. 2018 Jan;51(1):102-11.
16. Zhou HM, Shen Y, Zheng W, Li L, Zheng YF, Haapasalo M. Physical properties of 5 root canal sealers. J Endod. 2013 Oct;39(10):1281-6.
17. Lo Giudice G, Cutroneo G, Centofanti A, Artemisia A, Bramanti E, Militi A, et al. Dentin morphology of root canal surface: a quantitative evaluation based on a scanning electronic microscopy study. BioMed Res Int. 2015;2015:164065.
18. Nikhil V, Singh R. Confocal laser scanning microscopic investigation of ultrasonic, sonic, and rotary sealer placement techniques. J Conserv Dent. 2013 Jul;16(4):294-9.
19. De-Deus G, Gurgel-Filho ED, Maniglia-Ferreira C, Coutinho-Filho T. Influence of the filling technique on depth of tubular penetration of root canal sealer: a scanning electron microscopy study. Braz J Oral Sci. 2004 Apr-Jun;3(9):433-38.
20. Sonu KR, Girish TN, Ponnappa KC, Kishan KV, Thameem PK. “Comparative evaluation of dentinal penetration of three different endodontic sealers with and without smear layer removal” - Scanning electron microscopic study. Saudi Endod J. 2016;6(1):16-20.
21. Generali L, Cavani F, Serena V, Pettenati C, Righi E, Bertoldi C. Effect of Different Irrigation Systems on Sealer Penetration into Dentinal Tubules. J Endod. 2017 Apr;43(4):652-6.
22. Jeong JW, DeGraft-Johnson A, Dorn SO, Di Fiore PM. Dentinal Tubule Penetration of a Calcium Silicate-based Root Canal Sealer with Different Obturation Methods. J Endod. 2017 Apr;43(4):633-7.
23. Kara Tuncer A, Tuncer S. Effect of different final irrigation solutions on dentinal tubule penetration depth and percentage of root canal sealer. J Endod. 2012 Jun;38(6):860-3.
24. Chandra SS, Shankar P, Indira R. Depth of penetration of four resin sealers into radicular dentinal tubules: a confocal microscopic study. J Endod. 2012 Oct;38(10):1412-6.
25. Attur KM, Kamat S, Shylaja KA, Tegginmani V, Patil D, Choudary RP. A comparison of apical seal and tubular penetration of
26. mineral trioxide aggregate, zinc oxide eugenol, and AH26 as root canal sealers in laterally condensed gutta-percha obturation: An in vitro study. Endodontology. 2017;29(1):20-5.
27. Weis MV, Parashos P, Messer HH. Effect of obturation technique on sealer cement thickness and dentinal tubule penetration. Int Endod J. 2004 Oct;37(10):653-63.
28. Sevimay S, Kalayci A. Evaluation of apical sealing ability and adaptation to dentine of two resin-based sealers. J Oral Rehabil. 2005 Feb;32(2):105-10.
29. De-Deus G, Brandão M, Leal F, Reis C, Souza EM, Luna AS, et al. Lack of correlation between sealer penetration into dentinal
30. tubules and sealability in nonbonded root fillings. Int Endod J. 2012 Jul;45(7):642-51.
31. Moradi S, Ghoddusi J, Forghani M. Evaluation of dentinal tubule penetration after the use of dentin bonding agent as a root canal sealer. J Endod. 2009 Nov;35(11):1563-6.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:


XML     Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Toursavadkohi S, Zameni F, Afkar M. Comparison of Tubular Penetration of AH26, EasySeal, and SureSeal Root Canal Sealers in Single-Rooted Teeth Using Scanning Electron Microscopy. J Res Dentomaxillofac Sci. 2018; 3 (3) :27-32
URL: http://jrdms.dentaliau.ac.ir/article-1-211-en.html

Volume 3, Issue 3 (Journal of Research in Dental & Maxillofacial Sciences Summer 2018) Back to browse issues page
Journal of Research in Dental and Maxillofacial Sciences
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 30 queries by YEKTAWEB 3877