Volume 3, Issue 2 (4-2018)
J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci 2018, 3(2): 1-6 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Jalalian E, Bagheri M, Masoumi S. Effect of Core Thickness and Porcelain Sintering on Marginal Adaptation. J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci 2018; 3 (2) :1-6
URL: http://jrdms.dentaliau.ac.ir/article-1-195-en.html
URL: http://jrdms.dentaliau.ac.ir/article-1-195-en.html
1- Assistant Professor, Prosthodontics Dept, Dental Branch of Tehran,
2- Prosthodontics Dept, Dental Branch of Tehran, ,mohamadreza_bghr@yahoo.com
3- Dentist
2- Prosthodontics Dept, Dental Branch of Tehran, ,
3- Dentist
Abstract: (3753 Views)
Background and aim: Marginal adaptation affects the long-term success of full-coverage restorations. This study aimed to assess the effect of porcelain sintering and zirconia core thickness on the marginal adaptation of all-ceramic restorations.
Materials and methods: In this in-vitro experimental study, a standard brass die, 7 mm in length and 5 mm in diameter, was fabricated using a milling machine. A classic chamfer finish line with the depth of 0.8 mm was prepared with 10-degree tapered walls. Copings were fabricated on the die using the computer aided design/computer aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) system and were divided into three groups (n=10) with 0.3-mm (group 1), 0.5-mm (group 2), and 0.7-mm (group 3) core thicknesses. The copings were placed on the dies and randomly coded. The vertical gap was measured at 10 points on the margin under a scanning electron microscope (SEM). After porcelain sintering, the crowns were placed again on the dies, and the vertical gap was measured again at the same points. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and paired t-test.
Results: There was a significant difference among the three groups in marginal gap (P<0.05). The comparison of marginal gaps before and after porcelain sintering showed no significant changes with 0.3-mm and 0.5-mm thicknesses (P>0.05) but the difference was statistically significant with 0.7-mm core thickness (P<0.05).
Conclusion: It may be concluded that by increasing the zirconia core thickness, the marginal gap of all-ceramic crowns decreases. Regarding 0.3-mm and 0.5-mm core thicknesses, porcelain sintering had no effect on marginal gap but regarding 0.7-mm core thickness, marginal gap increased after sintering.[U1]
Materials and methods: In this in-vitro experimental study, a standard brass die, 7 mm in length and 5 mm in diameter, was fabricated using a milling machine. A classic chamfer finish line with the depth of 0.8 mm was prepared with 10-degree tapered walls. Copings were fabricated on the die using the computer aided design/computer aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) system and were divided into three groups (n=10) with 0.3-mm (group 1), 0.5-mm (group 2), and 0.7-mm (group 3) core thicknesses. The copings were placed on the dies and randomly coded. The vertical gap was measured at 10 points on the margin under a scanning electron microscope (SEM). After porcelain sintering, the crowns were placed again on the dies, and the vertical gap was measured again at the same points. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and paired t-test.
Results: There was a significant difference among the three groups in marginal gap (P<0.05). The comparison of marginal gaps before and after porcelain sintering showed no significant changes with 0.3-mm and 0.5-mm thicknesses (P>0.05) but the difference was statistically significant with 0.7-mm core thickness (P<0.05).
Conclusion: It may be concluded that by increasing the zirconia core thickness, the marginal gap of all-ceramic crowns decreases. Regarding 0.3-mm and 0.5-mm core thicknesses, porcelain sintering had no effect on marginal gap but regarding 0.7-mm core thickness, marginal gap increased after sintering.[U1]
[U1]5
Keywords: Zirconia, Marginal Adaptation, Computer Aided Design/Computer Aided Manufacturing, Dental Porcelain
Type of Study: Original article |
References
1. Nagarkar SR, Perdigão J, Seong WJ, Theis-Mahon N. Digital versus conventional impressions for full-coverage restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Dent Assoc. 2018 Feb;149(2):139-147.e1. [DOI:10.1016/j.adaj.2017.10.001] [PMID]
2. Bindl A, Mormann WH. Marginal and internal fit of all-ceramic CAD/CAM crown-copings on chamfer preparations. J Oral Rehabil. 2005 Jun;32(6):441-7. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01446.x] [PMID]
3. Quintas AF, Oliveira F, Bottino MA. Vertical marginal discrepancy of ceramic copings with different ceramic materials, finish lines, and luting agents: an in vitro evaluation. J Prosthet Dent. 2004 Sep;92(3):250-7. [DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.06.023] [PMID]
4. Sailer I, Fehér A, Filser F, Gauckler LJ, Lüthy H, Hämmerle CH. Five-year clinical results of zirconia frameworks for posterior fixed partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont. 2007 Jul-Aug;20(4):383-8.
5. Chu CH, King NM, Lee AM, Yiu CK, Wei SH. A pilot study of the marginal adaptation and surface morphology of glass-cermet cements. Quintessence Int. 1996 Jul;27(7):493-501.
6. Lang NP, Kiel RA, Anderhalden K. Clinical and microbiological effects of subgingival restorations with overhanging or clinically perfect margins. J Clin Periodontal. 1983 Nov;10(6):563-78. [DOI:10.1111/j.1600-051X.1983.tb01295.x] [PMID]
7. Schwartz NL, Whitsett LD, Berry TG, Stewart JL. Unserviceable crowns and fixed partial dentures: life-span and causes for loss of serviceability. J Am Dent Assoc. 1970 Dec;81(6):1395-401. [DOI:10.14219/jada.archive.1970.0398] [PMID]
8. Walton JN, Gardner FM, Agar JR. A survey of crown and fixed partial denture failures: length of service and reasons for replacement. J Prosthet Dent. 1986 Oct;56(4):416-21. [DOI:10.1016/0022-3913(86)90379-3]
9. Padbury A Jr, Eber R, Wang HL. Interactions between the gingiva and the margin of restorations. J Clin Periodontol. 2003 May;30(5):379-85. [DOI:10.1034/j.1600-051X.2003.01277.x] [PMID]
10. Tjan AH, Li T, Logan GI, Baum L. Marginal accuracy of complete crowns made from alternative casting alloys. J Prosthet Dent. 1991 Aug;66(2):157-64. [DOI:10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80041-1]
11. Yüksel E, Zaimoglu A. Influence of marginal fit and cement types on microleakage of all-ceramic crown systems. Braz Oral Res. 2011 May-Jun;25(3):261-6. [DOI:10.1590/S1806-83242011000300012] [PMID]
12. Philips RW, Swartz ML, Lund MS, Moore BK, Vickery J. In vivo disintegration of luting cements. J Am Dent Assoc. 1987 Apr;114(4):489-92. [DOI:10.14219/jada.archive.1987.0093] [PMID]
13. Preston JD. Rational approach to tooth preparation for ceramo-metal restorations. Dent Clin North Am.1977 Oct;21(4):683-98.
14. Going RE. Microleakage around dental restorations: a summarizing review. J Am Dent Assoc. 1972 Jun;84(6):1349-57. [DOI:10.14219/jada.archive.1972.0226] [PMID]
15. Felton DA, Kanoy BE, Bayne SC, Wirthman GP. Effect of in vivo crown margin discrepancies on periodontal health. J Prosthet Dent. 1991 Mar;65(3):357-64. [DOI:10.1016/0022-3913(91)90225-L]
16. Tuntiprawon M, Wilson PR. The effect of cement thickness on the fracture strength of all-ceramic crowns. Aust Dent J. 1995 Feb;40(1):17-21. [DOI:10.1111/j.1834-7819.1995.tb05607.x] [PMID]
17. Bettie NF, Kandasamy S, Prasad V. Management of Tooth Surface Loss of Varying Etiology with Full Mouth all Ceramic Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacture Restorations. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2017 Nov;9(Suppl 1):S302-S305. [DOI:10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_130_17] [PMID] [PMCID]
18. Komine F, Iwai T, Kobayashi K, Matsumura H. Marginal and internal adaptation of zirconium dioxide ceramic copings and crowns with different finish line designs. Dent Mater J. 2007 Sep;26(5):659-64. [DOI:10.4012/dmj.26.659] [PMID]
19. Vigolo P, Fonzi F. An in vitro evaluation of fit of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic four-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems, before and after porcelain firing cycles and after glaze cycles. J Prosthodont. 2008 Dec;17(8):621-6. [DOI:10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00366.x] [PMID]
20. Vult von Steyern P, Ebbesson S, Holmgren J, Haag P, Nilner K. Fracture strength of two oxide ceramic crown systems after cyclic pre-loading and thermocycling. J Oral Rehabil. 2006 Sep;33(9):682-9. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01604.x] [PMID]
21. Balkaya MC, Cinar A, Pamuk S. Influence of firing cycles on the margin distortion of 3 all-ceramic crown systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2005 Apr;93(4):346-55. [DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.02.003] [PMID]
22. Pak HS, Han JS, Lee JB, Kim SH, Yang JH. Influence of porcelain veneering on the marginal fit of Digident and Lava CAD/CAM zirconia ceramic crowns. J Adv Prosthodont. 2010 Jun;2(2):33-8. [DOI:10.4047/jap.2010.2.2.33] [PMID] [PMCID]
23. Reich S, Petschelt A, Lohbauer U. The effect of finish line preparation and layer thickness on the failure load and fractography of ZrO2 copings. J Prosthet Dent. 2008 May;99(5):369-76. [DOI:10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60085-2]
24. Manicone PF, Rossi Iommetti P, Raffaelli L. An overview of zirconia ceramics: basic properties and clinical applications. J Dent. 2007 Nov;35(11):819-26. [DOI:10.1016/j.jdent.2007.07.008] [PMID]
25. Romeo E, Iorio M, Storelli S, Camandona M, Abati S. [Marginal adaptation of full-coverage CAD/CAM restorations: in vitro study using a non-destructive method]. [Article in English, Italian]. Minerva Stomatol. 2009 Mar;58(3):61-72.
26. Sjögren G, Lantto R, Granberg A, Sundström BO, Tillberg A. Clinical examination of leucite-reinforced glass-ceramic crowns (Empress) in general practice: a retrospective study. Int J Prosthodont. 1999 Mar-Apr;12(2):122-8.
27. Yeo IS, Yang JH, Lee JB. In vitro marginal fit of three all-ceramic crown systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Nov;90(5):459-64. [DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.08.005] [PMID]
28. Kokubo Y, Nagayama Y, Tsumita M, Ohkubo C, Fukushima S, Vult von Steyern P. Clinical marginal and internal gaps of In-Ceram crowns fabricated using the GN-I system. J Oral Rehabil. 2005 Oct;32(10):753-8. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01506.x] [PMID]
29. Wolfart S, Wegner SM, Al-Halabi A, Kern M. Clinical evaluation of marginal fit of a new experimental all-ceramic system before and after cementation. Int J Prosthodont. 2003 Nov-Dec;16(6):587-92.
30. Nakamura T, Dei N, Kojima T, Wakabayashi K. Marginal and internal fit of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont. 2003 May-Jun;16(3):244-8.
31. Okutan M, Heydecke G, Butz F, Strub JR. Fracture loud and marginal fit of shrinkage-free ZrSiO4 all-ceramic crowns after chewing simulation. J Oral Rehabil. 2006 Nov;33(11):827-32. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01637.x] [PMID]
32. Gu XH, Kern M. Marginal discrepancies and leakage of all-ceramic crowns: influence of luting agents and aging conditions. Int J Prosthodont. 2003 Mar-Apr;16(2):109-16.
33. Mclean JW, von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J. 1971 Aug 3;131(3):107-11. [DOI:10.1038/sj.bdj.4802708] [PMID]
34. Jalalian E, Sadegh M, Masoomi S, Jalalian S, Evazi Ziyaei A. Effect of thickness of zirconia core on marginal adaptation of all-ceramic restorations. JIDAI. 2014;26(3);158-62.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
