دوره 10، شماره 3 - ( 6-1404 )
جلد 10 شماره 3 صفحات 261-248 |
برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
Ethics code: IR.SBMU.DRC.REC.1399.019
Clinical trials code: IR.SBMU.DRC.REC.1399.019
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Valian A, Madani T, Kheirkhah Dabbagh N. A Comparative Analysis of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomers and Composite Resins for Restoration of Non-Carious Cervical Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci 2025; 10 (3) :248-261
URL: http://jrdms.dentaliau.ac.ir/article-1-701-fa.html
URL: http://jrdms.dentaliau.ac.ir/article-1-701-fa.html
A Comparative Analysis of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomers and Composite Resins for Restoration of Non-Carious Cervical Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. . 1404; 10 (3) :248-261
چکیده: (23 مشاهده)
Background and Aim: The objective of this review was to assess the clinical efficacy of resin-modified glass ionomers (RMGIs) and composite resins for management of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs).
Materials and Methods: A systematic search was conducted using the Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register, MEDLINE via Ovid, EMBASE via Ovid, and PubMed Health, with no restrictions on language up to 2021. The review included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a minimum follow-up period of 12 months, comparing RMGI restorations to composite resin restorations in adult populations with NCCLs. The primary outcomes assessed were retention rate, marginal integrity, and marginal discoloration. The search results were rigorously screened, and relevant trial data were extracted. Additionally, the risk of bias for the included studies was evaluated. The results were presented as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and a meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5 (RevMan 5).
Results: Of 978 retrieved references, 12 trials (15 articles) were included in this systematic review. Nine trials were split-mouth studies involving 414 RMGI restorations and 454 composite restorations. The remaining three trials were parallel group studies involving 83 RMGI restorations and 131 composite restorations. The meta-analysis showed that RMGI restorations had a significantly lower failure rate (RR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.23 to 0.52) than composite restorations. However, no significant difference was found between the two materials for marginal integrity and marginal discoloration (P>0.05).
Conclusion: RMGI restorations exhibited superior clinical performance regarding the retention rate for NCCLs.
Materials and Methods: A systematic search was conducted using the Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register, MEDLINE via Ovid, EMBASE via Ovid, and PubMed Health, with no restrictions on language up to 2021. The review included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a minimum follow-up period of 12 months, comparing RMGI restorations to composite resin restorations in adult populations with NCCLs. The primary outcomes assessed were retention rate, marginal integrity, and marginal discoloration. The search results were rigorously screened, and relevant trial data were extracted. Additionally, the risk of bias for the included studies was evaluated. The results were presented as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and a meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5 (RevMan 5).
Results: Of 978 retrieved references, 12 trials (15 articles) were included in this systematic review. Nine trials were split-mouth studies involving 414 RMGI restorations and 454 composite restorations. The remaining three trials were parallel group studies involving 83 RMGI restorations and 131 composite restorations. The meta-analysis showed that RMGI restorations had a significantly lower failure rate (RR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.23 to 0.52) than composite restorations. However, no significant difference was found between the two materials for marginal integrity and marginal discoloration (P>0.05).
Conclusion: RMGI restorations exhibited superior clinical performance regarding the retention rate for NCCLs.
نوع مطالعه: Review article |
موضوع مقاله:
Restorative Dentistry
| بازنشر اطلاعات | |
 |
این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است. |
