<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<journal>
<title>Journal of Research in Dental and Maxillofacial Sciences</title>
<title_fa></title_fa>
<short_title>J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci</short_title>
<subject>Medical Sciences</subject>
<web_url>http://jrdms.dentaliau.ac.ir</web_url>
<journal_hbi_system_id>1</journal_hbi_system_id>
<journal_hbi_system_user>admin</journal_hbi_system_user>
<journal_id_issn>2588-4166</journal_id_issn>
<journal_id_issn_online>2383-2754</journal_id_issn_online>
<journal_id_pii></journal_id_pii>
<journal_id_doi>10.61882/jrdms</journal_id_doi>
<journal_id_iranmedex></journal_id_iranmedex>
<journal_id_magiran></journal_id_magiran>
<journal_id_sid></journal_id_sid>
<journal_id_nlai></journal_id_nlai>
<journal_id_science></journal_id_science>
<language>en</language>
<pubdate>
	<type>jalali</type>
	<year>1403</year>
	<month>12</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<pubdate>
	<type>gregorian</type>
	<year>2025</year>
	<month>3</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<volume>10</volume>
<number>1</number>
<publish_type>online</publish_type>
<publish_edition>1</publish_edition>
<article_type>fulltext</article_type>
<articleset>
	<article>


	<language>en</language>
	<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
	<title_fa></title_fa>
	<title>Position of Second Mesiobuccal Canal Relative to Distobuccal and Palatal Canals of Maxillary Molars in an Iranian Population</title>
	<subject_fa>Endodontics</subject_fa>
	<subject>Endodontics</subject>
	<content_type_fa>Original article</content_type_fa>
	<content_type>Original article</content_type>
	<abstract_fa></abstract_fa>
	<abstract>&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:13pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;line-height:105%&quot;&gt;&lt;span new=&quot;&quot; roman=&quot;&quot; style=&quot;font-family:&quot; times=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;line-height:105%&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:&quot; verdana=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:#2e74b5&quot;&gt;Background and Aim&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;line-height:105%&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:&quot; verdana=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:#2e74b5&quot;&gt;:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt; &lt;span style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;line-height:105%&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:&quot; verdana=&quot;&quot;&gt;This study assessed the position of the second mesiobuccal (MB2) canal relative to the distobuccal (DB) and palatal (P) canals of maxillary molars in an Iranian population using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:13pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;line-height:105%&quot;&gt;&lt;span new=&quot;&quot; roman=&quot;&quot; style=&quot;font-family:&quot; times=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;line-height:105%&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:&quot; verdana=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:#2e74b5&quot;&gt;Materials and Methods: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;line-height:105%&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:&quot; verdana=&quot;&quot;&gt;This cross-sectional study evaluated 110 CBCT scans of patients retrieved from a radiology clinic in Isfahan, Iran. The MB1-MB2 inter-orifice distance, and the angle formed between the MB1-MB2 line and the DB-P line were measured on reconstructed axial sections. The angulation of MB2 orifice relative to the DB and P canals was categorized as positive, negative, and parallel. Data were compared by Student t-test, Fisher&amp;rsquo;s exact test, and Chi-square test (alpha=0.05).&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:13pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;line-height:105%&quot;&gt;&lt;span new=&quot;&quot; roman=&quot;&quot; style=&quot;font-family:&quot; times=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;line-height:105%&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:&quot; verdana=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:#2e74b5&quot;&gt;Results: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;line-height:105%&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:&quot; verdana=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:#0e101a&quot;&gt;The mean MB1-MB2 inter-orifice distance was not significantly different in first and second molars, in the right and left sides, or in males and females (P&gt;0.05). Negative angulation of MB2 orifice relative to the DB and P canals had the highest frequency (72.7%) followed by positive angulation (23.6%). Angulation of MB2 orifice had no significant correlation with tooth type (first/second molar), laterality, or gender (P&gt;0.05).&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;line-height:105%&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:&quot;Verdana&quot;,sans-serif&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:13pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;line-height:105%&quot;&gt;&lt;span new=&quot;&quot; roman=&quot;&quot; style=&quot;font-family:&quot; times=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;line-height:105%&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:&quot; verdana=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:#2e74b5&quot;&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt; &lt;span style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;line-height:105%&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:&quot; verdana=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:#0e101a&quot;&gt;The mean MB1-MB2 inter-orifice distance had no significant correlation with tooth type, laterality, or gender. Negative angulation of the MB2 relative to the DB and P canals had the highest frequency, indicating that if a hypothetical line is drawn from the MB1 orifice parallel to the DB-P line, the MB2 orifice would be probably at the distal of this line. Angulation of MB2 orifice had no significant correlation with tooth type, laterality, or gender.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;</abstract>
	<keyword_fa></keyword_fa>
	<keyword>Maxilla, Molar, Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</keyword>
	<start_page>34</start_page>
	<end_page>39</end_page>
	<web_url>http://jrdms.dentaliau.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1291-1&amp;slc_lang=en&amp;sid=1</web_url>


<author_list>
	<author>
	<first_name>Sina</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Mosadeghian</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email>smosadeghian@gmail.com</email>
	<code>100319475328460013973</code>
	<orcid>100319475328460013973</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Dental School, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Azadeh</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Torkzadeh</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email>Azadehh.Torkzadeh@Gmail.com</email>
	<code>100319475328460013974</code>
	<orcid>100319475328460013974</orcid>
	<coreauthor>Yes
</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Dental School, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Parisa</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Ranjbarian</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email>p.ranjbarian@khuisf.ac.ir</email>
	<code>100319475328460013975</code>
	<orcid>100319475328460013975</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Endodontics, Dental School, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Roya</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Asaadi</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email>asaadi.roya@gmail.com</email>
	<code>100319475328460013976</code>
	<orcid>100319475328460013976</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Dental School, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


</author_list>


	</article>
</articleset>
</journal>
