Volume 10, Issue 1 (3-2025)                   J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci 2025, 10(1): 8-14 | Back to browse issues page

Ethics code: A-12-623-18


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Nazemi Salman B, Aliyari N, Yazdinezhad A, Taheri S S, Mohammadi Qeydari M. Effect of Silver Nanoparticles Green Synthesized by Using the Quercus Infectoria Extract on Some Dental Pathogens. J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci 2025; 10 (1) :8-14
URL: http://jrdms.dentaliau.ac.ir/article-1-552-en.html
1- Pediatric Dentistry, Dental School, Zanjan University of Medical sciences, Zanjan, Iran
2- Faculty of Dentistry, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran
3- Department of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, School of Pharmacy, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran
4- Department of Biostatistics, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Solmaz.taheri.1990@gmail.com
5- Student Research Committee, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran
Full-Text [PDF 395 kb]   (44 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (135 Views)
Full-Text:   (31 Views)
Abstract
Background and Aim: Green synthesis through using plants such as Quercus infectoria (Q. infectoria) is a relatively novel technique for synthesis of nanoparticles. This study aimed to assess the effect of silver nanoparticles (SNPs) green synthesized by using the Q. infectoria extract on some dental pathogens.
Materials and Methods: In this in vitro study, SNPs were synthesized by using the Q. infectoria extract and silver nitrate. Formation of SNPs was confirmed by UV-visible spectrophotometry. Presence/absence and proliferation of Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans), Streptococcus salivarius (S. salivarius), Streptococcus sobrinus (S. sobrinus), Lactobacillus acidophilus (L. acidophilus), and Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) were evaluated by observing the tube turbidity following their culture in presence of SNPs. Also, different concentrations of Q. infectoria extract (1, ½, ¼, 1/8, and 1/16) were added to 5 bacterial plates, and the diameter of the growth inhibition zones was measured by a ruler. The results were reported descriptively. 
Results: The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of SNPs against L. acidophilus was lower than that for other pathogens. The highest antibacterial effect was observed in concentration of 1 against L. acidophilus, and ½ on S. salivarius and L. acidophilus. Also, L. acidophilus was the most sensitive and E. faecalis was the least sensitive microorganism to ¼, 1/8, and 1/16 concentrations. The 1/16 concentration caused no growth inhibition zone in E. faecalis plate.
Conclusion: Green synthesized SNPs had acceptable antibacterial activity against the tested microorganisms, and may be used as an antibacterial agent against these pathogens.
Keywords: Silver; Nanoparticles; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Streptococcus mutans; Lactobacillus acidophilus


Introduction

Nanotechnology is currently a highly important  topic  of  research [1].  Nanoparticles
have shown unique characteristics in terms of size, morphology, and distribution [2,3]. The size of nanoparticles is equal to or smaller than 100 nm. Nanoparticles have unique properties. Their small size results in a large surface/volume ratio, increasing their biochemical activity [4]. Nanoparticles are used in drug delivery systems, biology, gene transfer, chemical industry, and mechanics, among others [5]. Historically, silver metal (Ag) has antimicrobial effects and many applications in traditional medicine and even cooking. Silver has long been used in medicine due to its significant bactericidal and therapeutic properties [6]. Also, silver nanoparticles (SNPs) are more beneficial than free silver, due to providing a larger contact surface for exposure to microorganisms. SNPs have some important applications [7]. They are commonly used in medicine, and topical ointments for infection prevention in open wounds and burns [8]. There has been a growing interest in synthesis of SNPs due to their excellent antibacterial properties [9]. However, their exact mechanism of action remains unknown; although some studies have reported that the electrostatic force between the negatively charged bacterial cells and positively charged SNPs would result in their bactericidal activity [10,11]. Several methods are available for synthesis of SNPs, such as the physical and chemical methods and biological protocols [12]. These methods have subgroups such as recovery of silver salt compounds in liquid media, chemical and photochemical reactions in reverse micelles, thermal decomposition of silver compounds, photolysis, and electrochemistry [13]. Synthesis of SNPs in plants is superior to physical and chemical methods because it is cost-effective and, like other biological methods, does not harm the environment [14]. Biosynthesis of SNPs by using plant extracts is a low-cost, biocompatible, and accessible technique [9]. Green synthesis does not harm the nature, and is easy to perform [14]. It does not require high temperature, energy, pressure, or chemicals [15]. Some chemicals used in production of nanoparticles may be toxic for the nature and/or the human body [16]. Recently, green synthesis by using herbal products such as Argemone mexicana leaf extract has been added to old methods for reduction of silver nitrate [17]. Quercus infectoria (Q. infectoria), gall oak, or Aleppo oak (Q. infectoria flowers used for treatment of postpartum wound infection in traditional Malay medicine) is among other plants used for this purpose [18,19]. Roy et al. [20,21] showed optimal efficacy of green synthesis for reduction of toxicity. Evidence shows that SNPs are not toxic for the human body and have the highest antimicrobial efficacy in low concentrations against the bacteria, viruses, and other eucaryotic microorganisms with no side effect [20,21].
Dental caries is a common chronic disease worldwide [22]. Microbial plaque is the main cause of development of dental caries. Thus, green synthesis of SNPs by using the Q. infectoria plant may be able to prevent dental caries and periodontal disease given that their antibacterial activity against oral pathogens such as Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans), Streptococcus salivarius (S. salivarius), and Lactobacillus acidophilus (L. acidophilus) is confirmed [23]. In the study conducted by Almatroudi et al. [6], SNPs inhibited the growth and proliferation of S. mutans in planktonic form and eliminated S. mutans biofilm. Dos Santos Junior et al. [24] demonstrated the bactericidal activity of SNPs against S. mutans. Thus, it appears that SNPs can effectively prevent dental caries. Considering the significance of green synthesized SNPs and applications of nanotechnology in dentistry [25], this study aimed to assess the antimicrobial effects of green synthesized SNPs using the Q. infectoria extract on some dental pathogens.


Materials and Methods

This study was approved by the ethics committee of Zanjan University of Medical Sciences (A-12-623-18). This in vitro study was conducted in three steps. In the first step, Q. infectoria plant was collected from Zagros mountains and dried aways from sunlight at room temperature. Dried plant was refrigerated until extraction. Its extract was obtained by the maceration technique using a solvent at three different temperatures. For this purpose, 5 g of the plant was ground in a mortar and transferred to an Erlenmeyer flask; 125 mL of deionized water was added to it and stirred for 30 minutes at 25°C in a rotary shaker incubator on average speed. The same process was repeated for extraction at 50°C and 80°C as well. After completion of incubation, the extract was centrifuged at 600 rpm, and the contents             of the Falcon tubes were filtered using #1 Whatman filter paper. The extracts were frozen and stored at -20°C.
In the second step, different concentrations of the Q. infectoria extract were tested to optimize SNPs and obtain their maximum concentration. To synthesize SNPs, the aqueous extract at different temperatures and silver nitrate salt were used. Accordingly, 5 tubes were coded and a sampler was used to transfer 50, 100, 200, 400 and 800 mL of the extract to the test tubes #1 to #5, respectively. Next, 8 mL of 1 mM silver nitrate salt was added to each test tube to create 1:10, 1:20, 1:40, 1:80, and 1:160 dilutions. The samples were then manually mixed and placed in a dark chamber. For UV light spectrophotometric analysis, 1 mL of each test tube content was collected by a sampler and transferred into a microtube. The microtubes were centrifuged at 6000 rpm for 15 minutes, and the obtained sediment was rinsed with deionized water twice. Finally, 1 mL of deionized water was added to the sediment, and the obtained mixture was vortexed for 5 minutes. Next, 1 mL of the solution was added to each cell along with 3 mL of deionized water. To read the absorbance, the device was blanked using deionized water. The samples were added to the quartz cell, and their absorbance was read at 300-700 nm wavelength.
In the third step, the samples were sent to a microbiology laboratory for evaluation of antimicrobial activity of SNPs where the antibacterial activity of 1, ½, ¼, 1/8, and 1/16 concentrations of SNPs against the standard-strain S. mutans 1683 (ATCC 35668), Streptococcus salivarius (S. salivarius) 1448 (CIP53.158), Streptococcus sobrinus 1601 (S. sobrinus) (ATTC27607), L. acidophilus 1643 (DSM20079), and Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) 1237 (NCTC8213) was evaluated. The bacteria were cultured in a liquid medium overnight at room temperature. After observing turbidity, streptococci were cultured on tryptic soy broth agar, E. faecalis was cultured on Mueller Hinton agar, and L. acidophilus was cultured on MRS agar and isolated to ensure their purity. Next, the extracts were diluted in 11 tubes containing liquid culture medium. For this purpose, ½ of the pure concentration was collected and added to the liquid culture medium to obtain 1:2 dilution. This process was continued until the last concentration, half of which was discarded. The bacterial count in all tubes remained constant equal to 1.5 x 105. Next, the extracts were added and stored at room temperature for 24 hours. Subsequently, the turbidity of the tubes was evaluated to determine proliferation or no proliferation of the bacteria. Turbidity of a culture was defined as the 24-hour bacterial count in bouillon absorbing light [27]. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) is the lowest concentration of SNPs showing no bacterial growth. The minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) is the minimum concentration of SNPs causing elimination of 99.9% of the bacteria [28] (Figure 1). Also, the growth inhibition zones were measured to determine the MBC.
The results were reported descriptively.
Figure 1. Bacterial culture to determine the inhibition zones (minimum bactericidal concentration)

Results

In the first test, the MIC of L. acidophilus was lower than that of other bacteria (Tables 1 and 2). In the second test, pure concentration created the largest growth inhibition zone and showed the highest effect on L. acidophilus. The ½ concentration had the greatest effect on S. salivarius and L. acidophilus, and the smallest effect on E. faecalis. The ¼ concentration had the highest effect on L. acidophilus. The same was observed for lower concentrations. Also, L. acidophilus showed a growth inhibition zone diameter of 14, 12, 11, 8, and 7 mm around 1, ½, ¼, 1/8, and 1/16 concentrations, respectively; while, these concentrations caused equal or smaller growth inhibition zones in other microbial cultures. Nonetheless, only E. faecalis did not show a growth inhibition zone around 1:16 concentration (Table 3).

Table 1. Dilutions of SNPs for evaluation of their MIC

Table 2. MIC of SNPs for S. mutans, S. salivarius, S. sobrinus, E. faecalis, and L. acidophilus
Table 3. Inhibition zones of S. mutans caused by different dilutions of SNPs
 
Also, L. acidophilus was more sensitive than other microorganisms in both tests. A lower MIC would indicate the need for a lower concentration of SNPs for inhibition of microorganism. The smallest growth inhibition zone belonged to E. faecalis such that the growth inhibition zone diameter around 1, ½, ¼, 1/8, and 1/16 concentrations was 10, 8, 6, 5, and 0, respectively. In fact, E. faecalis was resistant to 1:16 concentration (62.5 µg/mL) of SNPs.    Other microorganisms were at the midpoint of this spectrum.

Discussion

Nature is an important source of products recently used in medical fields [29]. In the past two decades, due to the resistance of microorganisms against the existing synthetic medications, attempts have been made to use organic products [30]. SNPs are extensively used in medicine and different industries due to their high electrical and thermal conductivity, chemical stability, and antibacterial effects. The chemical methods of production of SNPs cause chemical toxicity, which may compromise their medical applications [31].
Several studies have evaluated green synthesis of nanoparticles by using plant extracts to determine their antimicrobial activity [5,32-34]. SNPs were synthesized in the present study by extraction of Q. infectoria extract and reaction with silver nitrate salt. Use of herbal extracts such as the Croton sparsiflorus morong leaves, ziziphus Jojo leave extract, and Argemone Mexicana leave extract has been suggested for the synthesis of silver, copper, and zinc nanoparticles [23,32-35]. UV-visible spectrophotometry was used in the present study to confirm the synthesis of SNPs although some others used X-ray diffraction or scanning electron microscopy for this purpose [36]. Next, the antibacterial activity of the synthesized extract was evaluated against five pathogenic microorganisms mainly responsible for dental caries, formation of dental biofilm, and periodontal disease. Some other studies also evaluated the activity of SNPs against S. mutans [5] and E. faecalis [5,36] while other oral microorganisms have been less commonly evaluated in the literature. Also, MIC and MBC tests were performed for evaluation of antimicrobial activity of the synthesized SNPs. In the present study, MBC was reported in millimeters while another study reported it in percentage [37].
In the present study, no comparison was made between the efficacy of synthesized SNPs and commonly prescribed antibiotics, and only the antibacterial activity of their different concentrations against different pathogens was compared; while, another study compared their antibacterial activity with some antibiotics [38]. Urnukhsaikhan et al. [5] used penicillin G and chloramphenicol as the control group. Soltani et al. [36] demonstrated that Gram-negative bacteria such as Escherichia coli had optimal sensitivity to green synthesized nanoparticles. Similarly, Rabbi et al. [37] showed optimal antibacterial activity of the synthesized SNPs against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria; however, their antibacterial activity was significantly greater against Gram-negative bacteria such as Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae compared with Gram-positive microorganisms such as Staphylococcus aureus. This difference can be due to differences in cell wall structure of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria [37]. Busi et al. [39] evaluated the antibacterial activity of green synthesized SNPs against Pseudomonas aerosols and demonstrated that green synthesized SNPs had antimicrobial activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria but this effect was more prominent on Gram-negative bacteria.
Enterococci showed resistance against the toxicity of SNPs in 1/16 (62.5 µg/mL) concentration. Other microorganisms had moderate sensitivity to SNPs. The same was reported by Busi et al. [39], who demonstrated that the MIC of SNPs was the highest for Staphylococcus aureus with a MBC of 62.5 µg/mL. Nonetheless, in vitro results are often different from the in vivo findings. In general, it has been confirmed that higher concentrations have a greater effect on microorganisms, and it appears that use of SNPs can decrease oral diseases.
The main limitation of this study was that it only evaluated some planktonic bacteria and made no comparison with the commonly prescribed antibiotics; whereas, bacteria in the form of biofilm cause dental caries or oral infections. Thus, future studies should assess the antimicrobial activity of SNPs against dental biofilm in comparison with other antimicrobial agents.

Conclusion

Green synthesized SNPs had acceptable antibacterial activity against the tested microorganisms, and may be used as an antibacterial agent against these pathogens.



 
Type of Study: Original article | Subject: Oral medicine

References
1. Loesche W. Dental Caries and Periodontitis: Contrasting Two Infections That Have Medical Implications. Vol. 21, Infectious Disease Clinics of North America. Elsevier; 2007. p. 471-502. [DOI:10.1016/j.idc.2007.03.006] [PMID]
2. Jeong SH, Yeo SY, Yi S. The effect of filler particle size on the antibacterial properties of compounded polymer/silver fibers. J Mater Sci. 2005 Oct;40(20):5407-11. [DOI:10.1007/s10853-005-4339-8]
3. Pal S, Tak YK, Song JM. Does the antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles depend on the shape of the nanoparticle? A study of the Gram-negative bacterium Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Mar;73(6):1712-20. [DOI:10.1128/AEM.02218-06] [PMID] []
4. Naiwa HS. HandBook of Nanostructural Materials. 2010. 4262 p.
5. Urnukhsaikhan E, Bold BE, Gunbileg A, Sukhbaatar N, Mishig-Ochir T. Antibacterial activity and characteristics of silver nanoparticles biosynthesized from Carduus crispus. Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 26;11(1):21047. [DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-00520-2] [PMID] []
6. Almatroudi A. Silver nanoparticles: synthesis, characterisation and biomedical applications. Open Life Sci. 2020 Nov 19;15(1):819-39. [DOI:10.1515/biol-2020-0094] [PMID] []
7. Elechiguerra JL, Burt JL, Morones JR, Camacho-Bragado A, Gao X, Lara HH, Yacaman MJ. Interaction of silver nanoparticles with HIV-1. J Nanobiotechnology. 2005 Jun 29;3:6. [DOI:10.1186/1477-3155-3-6] [PMID] []
8. Sondi I, Salopek-Sondi B. Silver nanoparticles as antimicrobial agent: a case study on E. coli as a model for Gram-negative bacteria. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2004 Jul 1;275(1):177-82. [DOI:10.1016/j.jcis.2004.02.012] [PMID]
9. Nagajyoti PC, TNVKV P, TVM S LK. Bio fabrication of silver nanoparticles using leafextract of Saururus chinensis. Dig J Nanomater Biostructures. 2011;6(1).
10. Temgire MK, Joshi SS. Optical and structural studies of silver nanoparticles. Radiat Phys Chem. 2004 Dec 1;71(5):1039-44. [DOI:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2003.10.016]
11. Zoval JV, Stiger RM, Biernacki PR, Penner RM. Electrochemical Deposition of Silver Nanocrystallites on the Atomically Smooth Graphite Basal Plane. J Phys Chem. 1996 Jan 11;100(2):837-44. [DOI:10.1021/jp952291h]
12. Patra JK, Baek KH. Green Nanobiotechnology: Factors Affecting Synthesis and Characterization Techniques. Journal of Nanomaterials.2014; Hindawi Limited; 2014. [DOI:10.1155/2014/417305]
13. Taleb A, Petit C, Pileni MP. Synthesis of Highly Monodisperse Silver Nanoparticles from AOT Reverse Micelles:  A Way to 2D and 3D Self-Organization. Chem Mater. 1997;9(4):950-9. [DOI:10.1021/cm960513y]
14. Korbekandi H, Chitsazi MR, Asghari G, Bahri Najafi R, Badii A, Iravani S. Green biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles using Quercus brantii (oak) leaves hydroalcoholic extract. Pharm Biol. 2015 Jun;53(6):807-12. [DOI:10.3109/13880209.2014.942868] [PMID]
15. Goia DV, Matijević E. Preparation of monodispersed metal particles. New J Chem. 1998 Jan 1;22(11):1203-15. [DOI:10.1039/a709236i]
16. Esumi K, Tano T, Torigoe K, Meguro K. Preparation and Characterization of Bimetallic Pd-Cu Colloids by Thermal Decomposition of Their Acetate Compounds in Organic Solvents. Chem Mater. 1990 Sep 1;2(5):564-7. [DOI:10.1021/cm00011a019]
17. Singh A, Jain D, Upadhyay MK, Khandelwal N, Verma H. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Argemone mexicana leaf extract and evaluation of their antimicrobial activities. Res Singh, D Jain, MK Upadhyay, N Khandelwal, HN VermaDig J Nanomater Bios, 2010•researchgate.net. 2010;5(2):483-9.
18. Guzman M, Dille J, Godet S. Synthesis and antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Nanomedicine. 2012 Jan;8(1):37-45. [DOI:10.1016/j.nano.2011.05.007] [PMID]
19. Askari SF, Azadi A, Jahromi NN, Tansaz B, Nasiri MM, Mohagheghzadeh A, et al. A Comprehensive Review about Quercus infectoria G. Olivier Gall. Res J Pharmacogn. 2020;7(1):69-77.
20. Roy N, Gaur A, Jain A, Bhattacharya S, Rani V. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles: an approach to overcome toxicity. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2013 Nov;36(3):807-12. [DOI:10.1016/j.etap.2013.07.005] [PMID]
21. Roy S, Mukherjee T, Chakraborty S, Das TK. Biosynthesis, characterisation & antifungal activity of silver nanoparticles synthesized by the fungus Aspergillus foetidus MTCC8876. Dig J Nanomater Biostructures. 2013;8(1):197-205.
22. Petersen PE. [Continuous improvement of oral health in the 21st century: the approach of the WHO Global Oral Health Programme]. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2004 Nov;39(6):441-4.
23. Khatamifar M, Fatemi SJ. Green synthesis of pure copper oxide nanoparticles using Quercus infectoria galls extract, thermal behavior and their antimicrobial effects. Part Sci Technol. 2022;40(1):18-26. [DOI:10.1080/02726351.2021.1901810]
24. dos Santos Junior VE, Targino AGR, Flores MAP, Rodríguez-Díaz JM, Teixeira JA, Heimer MV, et al. Antimicrobial activity of silver nanoparticle colloids of different sizes and shapes against Streptococcus mutans. Res Chem Intermed. 2017 Oct;43(10):5889-99. [DOI:10.1007/s11164-017-2969-5]
25. Subbiah U, Elango S, Jayesh R. Herbals and green synthesized nanoparticles in dentistry. Nanobiomaterials Clin Dent. 2019 Jan 1;617-46. [DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-815886-9.00025-5]
26. Ekstrand KR, Bruun G, Bruun M. Plaque and gingival status as indicators for caries progression on approximal surfaces. Caries Res. 1998;32(1):41-5. [DOI:10.1159/000016428] [PMID]
27. Alper T, Sterne M. The Measurement of the Opacity of Bacterial Cultures with a Photo-electric Cell. J Hyg (Lond). 1933 Nov;33(4):497-509. [DOI:10.1017/S0022172400018842] [PMID] []
28. Parvekar P, Palaskar J, Metgud S, Maria R, Dutta S. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of silver nanoparticles against Staphylococcus aureus. Biomater Investig Dent. 2020 Jul 23;7(1):105-9. [DOI:10.1080/26415275.2020.1796674] [PMID] []
29. Ahmad S, Munir S, Zeb N, Ullah A, Khan B, Ali J, Bilal M, Omer M, Alamzeb M, Salman SM, Ali S. Green nanotechnology: a review on green synthesis of silver nanoparticles - an ecofriendly approach. Int J Nanomedicine. 2019 Jul 10;14:5087-5107. [DOI:10.2147/IJN.S200254] [PMID] []
30. Savithramma N, Rao ML, Rukmini K, Devi PS. Antimicrobial activity of silver nanoparticles synthesized by using medicinal plants. Int J ChemTech Res. 2011;3(3):1394-402.
31. Ivanov I, Manolov S, Phuong N, Nguyen U, Dang NT, Doan L, et al. Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles: From Conventional to 'Modern' Methods-A Review. Process 2023, Vol 11, Page 2617. 2023 Sep 2;11(9):2617. [DOI:10.3390/pr11092617]
32. Kathiravan V, Ravi S, Ashokkumar S, Velmurugan S, Elumalai K, Khatiwada CP. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Croton sparsiflorus morong leaf extract and their antibacterial and antifungal activities. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2015 Mar 15;139:200-5. [DOI:10.1016/j.saa.2014.12.022] [PMID]
33. Gavade NL, Kadam AN, Suwarnkar MB, Ghodake VP, Garadkar KM. Biogenic synthesis of multi-applicative silver nanoparticles by using Ziziphus Jujuba leaf extract. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2015 Feb 5;136 Pt B:953-60. [DOI:10.1016/j.saa.2014.09.118] [PMID]
34. Singh A, Jain D, Upadhyay MK, Khandelwal N, Verma HN. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Argemone Mexicana leaf extract and evaluation of their antimicrobial activities. Dig J Nanomater Biostructures. 2010;5(2):483-9.
35. Samuel Jawahar B, Princess Rajendran A. Antidiabetic activity of green synthesized zinc oxide nanoparticles using Quercus infectoria. Intern J Zool Invest. 2021;7(2):1009-21. [DOI:10.33745/ijzi.2021.v07i02.092]
36. Soltani M, Shirvani H, Veisi H, Hemmati S, Mohammadi P, Jafard O. Antimicrobial effect of green nano-silver synthesized using aqueous extract of Teucrium Parvifolium seed and investigation of structural and morphological characteristics. Inorg Chem Commun. 2024 Jan 1;159:111847. [DOI:10.1016/j.inoche.2023.111847]
37. Rabbi F, Nisar A, Nawaz NUA, AlMasoud N, Alomar TS, Rauf A. Bio-fabrication of silver nanoparticles using an aqueous extract of Quercus baloot: Preparation, characterization and in vitro antimicrobial evaluation. Micro & Nano Letters. 2023 Sep;18(9-12):e12179. [DOI:10.1049/mna2.12179]
38. Mohamad Hanafiah R, Abd Ghafar SA, Lim V, Musa SNA, Yakop F, Hairil Anuar AH. Green synthesis, characterisation and antibacterial activities of Strobilanthes crispus-mediated silver nanoparticles (SC-AGNPS) against selected bacteria. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2023 Dec;51(1):549-59. [DOI:10.1080/21691401.2023.2268167] [PMID]
39. Busi S, Rajkumari J, Ranjan B, Karuganti S. Green rapid biogenic synthesis of bioactive silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) using Pseudomonas aeruginosa. IET Nanobiotechnol. 2014 Dec;8(4):267-74. [DOI:10.1049/iet-nbt.2013.0059] [PMID]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Research in Dental and Maxillofacial Sciences

Designed & Developed by: Yektaweb