Volume 7, Issue 2 (3-2022)                   J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci 2022, 7(2): 104-118 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


1- Dental student, Faculty of Dentistry, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran , pendarargani1375@gmail.com
2- Periodontology Dept., Faculty of Dentistry, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3- Dental student, Faculty of Dentistry, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (1369 Views)

Background and Aim: Lasers can serve as a new powerful tool in dentistry. High intensity laser therapy is becoming the treatment of choice compared with conventional periodontal therapy due to accurate incision and soft and hard tissue ablation, hemostasis, reduction of postoperative pain and infection, optimal debridement, and enhanced healing. Although high intensity laser therapy assumes to provide better results compared with conventional treatments, a significant variation exists in the applied laser parameters such as different wavelengths and energy densities of laser. The objective of this study was to collect preliminary information about the type and parameters of surgical lasers and how to use them technically based on the available literature on this topic.
Materials and Methods: After initial screening of 152 potentially relevant articles identified through an electronic search, 44 articles were selected based on the eligibility criteria by three independent reviewers. The inclusion criteria included studies on the outcomes of periodontal high intensity laser therapy in humans published in English between 2013 and 2021 in journals indexed in PubMed Central, Science Direct, Wiley Online Library, Springer or Google Scholar.
Results: The results showed that diode, Nd:YAG, Er:YAG, Er;Cr:YAG and CO2 lasers had the highest efficacy for frenectomy, gingivectomy,  and osteotomy with specific wavelength, power density, frequency, and pulse mode. Various lasers have been suggested for the abovementioned purposes, and the method of choice depends on the efficacy and availability of laser.
Conclusion: This study confirmed higher efficacy of different laser types compared with conventional treatments.

Full-Text [PDF 839 kb]   (629 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (731 Views)  
Type of Study: Review article | Subject: Periodontology

References
1. Maiman TH. Stimulated Optical Radiation in Ruby. Nature. 1960;187(4736):493-4. [DOI:10.1038/187493a0]
2. Adrian JC, Bernier JL, Sprague WG. Laser and the dental pulp. J Am Dent Assoc. 1971 Jul;83(1):113-7. [DOI:10.14219/jada.archive.1971.0267] [PMID]
3. Gross AJ, Herrmann TR. History of lasers. World J Urol. 2007 Jun;25(3):217-20. [DOI:10.1007/s00345-007-0173-8] [PMID]
4. Geusic JE, Marcos HM, Van Uitert LG. Laser oscillations in Nd-doped yttrium aluminum, yttrium gallium, and gadolinium garnets. Appl Phys Lett. 1964;4(10):182-4. [DOI:10.1063/1.1753928]
5. Kretlow JD, Young S, Klouda L, Wong M, Mikos AG. Injectable biomaterials for regenerating complex craniofacial tissues. Adv Mater. 2009 Sep 4;21(32-33):3368-93. [DOI:10.1002/adma.200802009] [PMID] [PMCID]
6. Farista S, Kalakonda B, Koppolu P, Baroudi K, Elkhatat E, Dhaifullah E. Comparing Laser and Scalpel for Soft Tissue Crown Lengthening: A Clinical Study. Glob J Health Sci. 2016 Oct 1;8(10):55795. [DOI:10.5539/gjhs.v8n10p73] [PMID]
7. Ganesh B, Burnice NKC, Mahendra J, Vijayalakshmi R, K AK. Laser-Assisted Lip Repositioning With Smile Elevator Muscle Containment and Crown Lengthening for Gummy Smile: A Case Report. Clin Adv Periodontics. 2019 Sep; 9(3): 135-41. [DOI:10.1002/cap.10060] [PMID]

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.