Volume 6, Issue 2 (3-2021)
J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci 2021, 6(2): 1-7 |
Back to browse issues page
1- Department of Endodontics, Member Ship of Dental Material Research Center, Faculty of Dentistry, Tehran Medical Sciences,Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2- Private Practice, Tehran, Iran
3- Dental Implant Research Center, Dental Faculty, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran , taherehbitaraf@ yahoo.com
2- Private Practice, Tehran, Iran
3- Dental Implant Research Center, Dental Faculty, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran , taherehbitaraf@ yahoo.com
Abstract: (2267 Views)
Background and Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the cytotoxicity of ProRoot MTA and Endocem at different times and concentrations on human gingival fibroblasts.
Materials and Methods: In this in-vitro study, ProRoot MTA and Endocem extracts with concentrations of 3, 6, 12, 25, and 50 mg/ml in the unhardened state (solution) at 24, 48, and 72 hours on human gingival fibroblasts were transferred to 96-well plates in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's medium (DMEM). For each material at any time and any concentration, three wells were used, and 90 samples were examined. Also, to calibrate the cytotoxicity measuring device at 24, 48, and 72 hours, 3 wells for positive control and 3 wells for negative control have been considered, which include a total of 9 positive control wells and 9 negative control wells. Samples were analyzed by MTT assay. Data were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA).
Results: In the present study, the samples in the two groups at different times and concentrations did not show a significant difference in terms of cytotoxicity (P<0.05). The highest cytotoxicity was related to Endocem at 24 hours and a concentration of 50 mg/ml, and the lowest was related to ProRoot MTA at 72 hours and a concentration of 6 mg/ml.
Conclusion: According to the research, in general, the degree of cytotoxicity of Endocem is comparable to that of ProRoot MTA.
Type of Study: Original article |
Subject:
Oral medicine
References
1. Keiser K, Johnson CC, Tipton DA. Cytotoxicity of mineral trioxide aggregate using human periodontal ligament fibroblasts. J Endod. 2000 May;26(5):288-91. [DOI:10.1097/00004770-200005000-00010] [PMID]
2. Song M, Yoon TS, Kim SY, Kim E. Cytotoxicity of newly developed pozzolan cement and other root-end filling materials on human periodontal ligament cell. Restor Dent Endod. 2014 Feb;39(1):39-44. [DOI:10.5395/rde.2014.39.1.39] [PMID] [PMCID]
3. Koseoglu S, Pekbagriyanik T, Kchkyilmaz E, Saglam M, Enhos S, Akgun A. Biological response of commercially available different tricalcium silicate-based cements and pozzolan cement. Microsc Res Tech. 2017;80:994-99. [DOI:10.1002/jemt.22891] [PMID]
4. Chung CJ, Kim E, Song M, Park JW, Shin SJ. Effects of two fast-setting calcium-silicate cements on cell viability and angiogenic factor release in human pulp-derived cells. Odontology. 2016 May;104(2):143-51. [DOI:10.1007/s10266-015-0194-5] [PMID]
5. Chang SW, Bae WJ, Yi JK, Lee S, Lee DW, Kum KY, Kim EC. Odontoblastic Differentiation, Inflammatory Response, and Angiogenic Potential of 4 Calcium Silicate-based Cements: Micromega MTA, ProRoot MTA, RetroMTA, and Experimental Calcium Silicate Cement. J Endod. 2015 Sep;41(9):1524-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.joen.2015.04.018] [PMID]
6. Mori GG, Teixeira LM, de Oliveira DL, Jacomini LM, da Silva SR. Biocompatibility evaluation of biodentine in subcutaneous tissue of rats. J Endod. 2014 Sep;40(9):1485-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.joen.2014.02.027] [PMID]
7. Choi Y, Park SJ, Lee SH, Hwang YC, Yu MK, Min KS. Biological effects and washout resistance of a newly developed fast-setting pozzolan cement. J Endod. 2013 Apr;39(4):467-72. [DOI:10.1016/j.joen.2012.11.023] [PMID]
8. Setbon HM, Devaux J, Iserentant A, Leloup G, Leprince JG. Influence of composition on setting kinetics of new injectable and/or fast setting tricalcium silicate cements. Dent Mater. 2014 Dec;30(12):1291-303. [DOI:10.1016/j.dental.2014.09.005] [PMID]
9. Song M, Kang M, Kim HC, Kim E. A randomized controlled study of the use of ProRoot mineral trioxide aggregate and Endocem as direct pulp capping materials. J Endod. 2015 Jan;41(1):11-5. [DOI:10.1016/j.joen.2014.09.005] [PMID]
10. Fotakis G, Timbrell JA. In vitro cytotoxicity assays: comparison of LDH, neutral red, MTT and protein assay in hepatoma cell lines following exposure to cadmium chloride. Toxicol Lett. 2006 Jan 5;160(2):171-7. [DOI:10.1016/j.toxlet.2005.07.001] [PMID]
11. Iwata T, Yamato M, Zhang Z, Mukobata S, Washio K, Ando T, Feijen J, Okano T, Ishikawa I. Validation of human periodontal ligament-derived cells as a reliable source for cytotherapeutic use. J Clin Periodontol. 2010 Dec;37(12):1088-99. [DOI:10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01597.x] [PMID]
12. Koulaouzidou EA, Economides N, Beltes P, Geromichalos G. In vitro evaluation of the cytotoxicity of ProRoot MTA and MTA Angelus. J Oral Sci. 2008;50:397-402. [DOI:10.2334/josnusd.50.397] [PMID]
13. Craige RG, Powers JMR. Restorative dental materials. 11th ed. Philadelphia; St. Louis: Mosby, 2000:137-8.
14. Scanlon C, Marchesan J, Soehren S, Matsuo M, Kapila Y. Capturing the regenerative potential of periodontal ligament fibroblasts. J Stem Cells Regen Med. 2011 Apr 1;7(1):54-6. [DOI:10.46582/jsrm.0701006] [PMID] [PMCID]
15. Morandini AC, Chaves Souza PP, Ramos-Junior ES, Brozoski DT, Sipert CR, Souza Costa CA, Santos CF. Toll-like receptor 2 knockdown modulates interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-8 but not stromal derived factor-1 (SDF-1/CXCL12) in human periodontal ligament and gingival fibroblasts. J Periodontol. 2013 Apr;84(4):535-44. [DOI:10.1902/jop.2012.120177] [PMID]
16. Sipert CR, Moraes IG, Bernardinelli N, Garcia RB, Bramante CM, Gasparoto TH, Figueira EA, Dionísio TJ, Campanelli AP, Oliveira SH, Cunha FQ, Santos CF. Heat-killed Enterococcus faecalis alters nitric oxide and CXCL12 production but not CXCL8 and CCL3 production by cultured human dental pulp fibroblasts. J Endod. 2010 Jan;36(1):91-4. [DOI:10.1016/j.joen.2009.10.014] [PMID]
17. Issa Y, Watts DC, Brunton PA, Waters CM, Duxbury AJ. Resin composite monomers alter MTT and LDH activity of human gingival fibroblasts in vitro. Dent Mater. 2004 Jan;20(1):12-20. [DOI:10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00053-8]
18. Kim M, Yang W, Kim H, Ko H. Comparison of the biological properties of ProRoot MTA, OrthoMTA, and Endocem MTA cements. J Endod. 2014 Oct;40(10):1649-53. [DOI:10.1016/j.joen.2014.04.013] [PMID]
19. Kang MK, Bae IH, Koh JT, Hwang YC, Hwang IN, Oh WM. Comparison of Biocompatibility of Four Root perforation repair Materials. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2009 Jan;34:192-8. [DOI:10.5395/JKACD.2009.34.3.192]
20. Yoshimine Y, Ono M, Akamine A. In vitro comparison of the biocompatibility of mineral trioxide aggregate, 4META/MMA-TBB resin, and intermediate restorative material as root-end-filling materials. J Endod. 2007 Sep;33(9):1066-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.joen.2007.05.006] [PMID]
21. Gorduysus M, Avcu N, Gorduysus O, Pekel A, Baran Y, Avcu F, Ural AU. Cytotoxic effects of four different endodontic materials in human periodontal ligament fibroblasts. J Endod. 2007 Dec;33(12):1450-4. [DOI:10.1016/j.joen.2007.08.017] [PMID]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |