Volume 6, Issue 1 (3-2021)
J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci 2021, 6(1): 24-29 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Tavakolinejad Z, razeghi H, Sadeghi M. Effect of Pretreatment with Fluoride, Chlorhexidine, and Mixed Fluoride-Chlorhexidine Gels on Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets: An Ex-Vivo Study. J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci 2021; 6 (1) :24-29
URL: http://jrdms.dentaliau.ac.ir/article-1-297-en.html
URL: http://jrdms.dentaliau.ac.ir/article-1-297-en.html
1- Assistant professor, Orthodontics Dept, Faculty of Dentistry
2- Dentist
3- Professor, Operative dentistry Dept, Faculty of Dentistry, Rafsanjan, Iran , mostafa.sadeghi110@yahoo.com
2- Dentist
3- Professor, Operative dentistry Dept, Faculty of Dentistry, Rafsanjan, Iran , mostafa.sadeghi110@yahoo.com
Abstract: (1880 Views)
Background and Aim: Orthodontic patients are at an increased risk of caries due to difficulty in plaque control. Antimicrobial agents, such as fluoride and chlorhexidine, can be useful in preventing tooth demineralization. The present study aimed to determine the effect of fluoride and chlorhexidine gels and their mixture on the shear bond strength (SBS) of orthodontic brackets.
Materials and Methods: In this ex-vivo study, 70 premolars were divided into seven groups. The first group was considered as the control. The second, third, and fourth groups were first etched with 37% phosphoric acid and then pretreated with chlorhexidine, fluoride, and fluoride-chlorhexidine gels, respectively. The brackets were then bonded. In the fifth, sixth, and seventh groups, the enamel surface was etched after pretreatment, and then, the brackets were bonded. After mounting the teeth, SBS was measured using the Instron machine. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tamhane's T2 test (α≤0.05).
Results: The mean SBS was 19.7 MPa in the control, 11.1±2.5 MPa in the second, 11.8±3.6 MPa in the third, 21±7.5 MPa in the fourth, 19.4±9 MPa in the sixth, and 14.1±6.7 MPa in the seventh group with no statistically significant differences. However, there was a statistically significant decrease in the mean SBS (8±5.2 MPa) of the fifth group (chlorhexidine before etching) compared to the control group (P=0.04).
Conclusion: The use of fluoride and chlorhexidine can be recommended to orthodontic patients because of antibacterial and anticaries properties and no significant decrease in the SBS of orthodontic brackets (except when chlorhexidine is used before etching).
Materials and Methods: In this ex-vivo study, 70 premolars were divided into seven groups. The first group was considered as the control. The second, third, and fourth groups were first etched with 37% phosphoric acid and then pretreated with chlorhexidine, fluoride, and fluoride-chlorhexidine gels, respectively. The brackets were then bonded. In the fifth, sixth, and seventh groups, the enamel surface was etched after pretreatment, and then, the brackets were bonded. After mounting the teeth, SBS was measured using the Instron machine. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tamhane's T2 test (α≤0.05).
Results: The mean SBS was 19.7 MPa in the control, 11.1±2.5 MPa in the second, 11.8±3.6 MPa in the third, 21±7.5 MPa in the fourth, 19.4±9 MPa in the sixth, and 14.1±6.7 MPa in the seventh group with no statistically significant differences. However, there was a statistically significant decrease in the mean SBS (8±5.2 MPa) of the fifth group (chlorhexidine before etching) compared to the control group (P=0.04).
Conclusion: The use of fluoride and chlorhexidine can be recommended to orthodontic patients because of antibacterial and anticaries properties and no significant decrease in the SBS of orthodontic brackets (except when chlorhexidine is used before etching).
Type of Study: Original article |
Subject:
Oral medicine
References
1. Sharma-Sayal SK, Rossouw PE, Kulkarni GV, Titley KC. The influence of orthodontic bracket base design on shear bond strength. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Jul;124(1):74-82. [DOI:10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00311-1]
2. Finnema KJ, Ozcan M, Post WJ, Ren Y, Dijkstra PU. In-vitro orthodontic bond strength testing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 May;137(5):615-22. [DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.12.021] [PMID]
3. Cozza P, Martucci L, De Toffol L, Penco SI. Shear bond strength of metal brackets on enamel. Angle Orthod. 2006 Sep;76(5):851-6.
4. Mizrahi E. Enamel demineralization following orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod. 1982 Jul;82(1):62-7. [DOI:10.1016/0002-9416(82)90548-6]
5. Clarkson JJ, McLoughlin J. Role of fluoride in oral health promotion. Int Dent J. 2000 Jun;50(3):119-28. [DOI:10.1111/j.1875-595X.2000.tb00552.x] [PMID]
6. Benson PE, Shah AA, Millett DT, Dyer F, Parkin N, Vine RS. Fluorides, orthodontics and demineralization: a systematic review. J Orthod. 2005 Jun;32(2):102-14. [DOI:10.1179/146531205225021033] [PMID]
7. Yetkin D, Sayar G. Effect of Fluoride Releasing Bonding Materials on Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets. Turk J Orthod. 2020 Mar 1;33(1):52-8. [DOI:10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19052] [PMID] [PMCID]
8. Scheie AA, Arneberg P, Krogstad O. Effect of orthodontic treatment on prevalence of Streptococcus mutans in plaque and saliva. Scand J Dent Res. 1984 Jun;92(3):211-7. [DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0722.1984.tb00881.x] [PMID]
9. Klaus K, Eichenauer J, Sprenger R, Ruf S. Oral microbiota carriage in patients with multibracket appliance in relation to the quality of oral hygiene. Head Face Med. 2016 Oct 28;12(1):28. [DOI:10.1186/s13005-016-0125-x] [PMID] [PMCID]
10. Sifakakis I, Papaioannou W, Papadimitriou A, Kloukos D, Papageorgiou SN, Eliades T. Salivary levels of cariogenic bacterial species during orthodontic treatment with thermoplastic aligners or fixed appliances: a prospective cohort study. Prog Orthod. 2018 Aug 1;19(1):25. [DOI:10.1186/s40510-018-0230-4] [PMID] [PMCID]
11. Mistry R, Goje SK, Kripalani A. Fluorides in Orthodontics: A Review. Int J Adv Res Develop. 2017;2(12):81-3.
12. Alavi S, Yaraghi N. The effect of fluoride varnish and chlorhexidine gel on white spots and gingival and plaque indices in fixed orthodontic patients: A placebo-controlled study. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2018 Jul-Aug;15(4):276-82.
13. Bakhadher W, Halawany H, Talic N, Abraham N, Jacob V. Factors Affecting the Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets - a Review of In Vitro Studies. Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove). 2015;58(2):43-8. [DOI:10.14712/18059694.2015.92] [PMID]
14. Bourke BM, Rock WP. Factors affecting the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to porcelain. Br J Orthod. 1999 Dec;26(4):285-90. [DOI:10.1093/ortho/26.4.285] [PMID]
15. Reddy AK, Kambalyal PB, Patil SR, Vankhre M, Khan MY, Kumar TR. Comparative evaluation and influence on shear bond strength of incorporating silver, zinc oxide, and titanium dioxide nanoparticles in orthodontic adhesive. J Orthod Sci. 2016 Oct-Dec;5(4):127-31. [DOI:10.4103/2278-0203.192115] [PMID] [PMCID]
16. Bishara SE, Chan D, Abadir EA. The effect on the bonding strength of orthodontic brackets of fluoride application after etching. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989 Mar;95(3):259-60. [DOI:10.1016/0889-5406(89)90056-5]
17. Sodagar A, Akhoundi MSA, Bahador A, Jalali YF, Behzadi Z, Elhaminejad F, Mirhashemi AH. Effect of TiO2 nanoparticles incorporation on antibacterial properties and shear bond strength of dental composite used in Orthodontics. Dental Press J Orthod. 2017 Sep-Oct;22(5):67-74. [DOI:10.1590/2177-6709.22.5.067-074.oar] [PMID] [PMCID]
18. Rafeeq RA, Saleem AI, Saloom HF. Effects of Fluoride Varnish and Chlorhexidine Gel on Shear Bond Strength of Monocrystalline Sapphire Orthodontic Brackets. Int Med J. 2020;25(2):669-76.
19. Khargekar NR, Kalathingal JH, Sam G, Elpatal MA, Hota S, Bhushan P. Evaluation of Different Pretreatment Efficacy with Fluoride-releasing Material on Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Bracket: An In Vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019 Dec 1;20(12):1442-6. [DOI:10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2697] [PMID]
20. Altmann AS, Collares FM, Leitune VC, Samuel SM. The effect of antimicrobial agents on bond strength of orthodontic adhesives: a meta-analysis of in vitro studies. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2016 Feb;19(1):1-9. [DOI:10.1111/ocr.12100] [PMID]
21. Frey C, Yetkiner E, Stawarczyk B, Attin T, Attin R. Effects of different chlorhexidine pretreatments on adhesion of metal brackets in vitro. Head Face Med. 2012;8(1):36. [DOI:10.1186/1746-160X-8-36] [PMID] [PMCID]
22. Tabrizi A, Cakirer B. A comparative evaluation of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate and fluoride on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Eur J Orthod. 2011 Jun;33(3):282-7. [DOI:10.1093/ejo/cjq062] [PMID]
23. Khosravani fard B, Fetrati A, Asadi E. Comparison between self-etching and conventional primers in repeated bracket bonding. J Res Dent maxillofac Sci. 2017;2(4):20-32. [DOI:10.29252/jrdms.2.4.20]
24. Dionysopoulos D. Effect of digluconate chlorhexidine on bond strength between dental adhesive systems and dentin: A systematic review. J Conserv Dent. 2016 Jan-Feb;19(1):11-6. [DOI:10.4103/0972-0707.173185] [PMID] [PMCID]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
