:: Volume 5, Issue 4 (Journal of Research in Dental & Maxillofacial Sciences Autumn 2020) ::
J Res Dentomaxillofac Sci 2020, 5(4): 13-19 Back to browse issues page
Effect of Cyanoacrylate Adhesive on Tissue Healing After Periodontal Surgery
S Sadatmansouri1, SH Moradi2, B Iranpour * 3
1- Associate Professor , Periodontology Dept, Dental Faculty, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2- Dentist, Tehran, Iran
3- Assistant Professor, Periodontology Dept, Dental Faculty, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran , iranpour1391@gmail.com
Abstract:   (297 Views)
Background and Aim: Research on reducing the symptoms and discomfort after periodontal surgery is a priority. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of cyanoacrylate adhesive on tissue healing after periodontal surgery.
Materials and Methods: In this split-mouth clinical trial, all patients who needed periodontal pocket removal surgery in two or more sextants were examined after receiving written informed consent. The mouth of each patient was randomly divided into control and case groups. Cyanoacrylate adhesive was used in the case group, and sutures were used in the control group to close the wound. Pain, plaque index of the surgical site, and tissue healing were evaluated in the first week of follow-up. The probing depth in the surgical site was assessed at the second follow-up (6 weeks after surgery). All the parameters were statistically analyzed by Mann-U-Whitney test.
Results: In the first week of follow-up, the level of pain was 4.7±1.34 in the control group and 4.4±1.68 in the case group with no statistically significant difference (P=0.2). The healing rate was 3.3±0.53 in the control group and 2.7±0.64 in the case group with no statistically significant difference (P=0.3). The plaque index in the first week of follow-up was 3.9±0.82 in the control group and 3.8±0.97 in the case group (P=0.2). The probing depth in the sixth week of follow-up was 2.5±0.67 in the control group and 2.8±0.6 in the case group (P=0.2).
Conclusion: Considering the results, it seems that cyanoacrylate adhesive can be a good alternative to sutures, especially when the patient cannot present for suture removal at the appointed time.
Keywords: Cyanoacrylates, Wound Healings, Periodontal Index, Surgery, Sutures
Full-Text [PDF 352 kb]   (120 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (45 Views)  
Type of Study: Original article | Subject: Periodontology
References
1. Hollander JE, Singer AJ. Laceration Management. Ann Emerg Med. 1999 Sep;34(3):356-67. [DOI:10.1016/S0196-0644(99)70131-9]
2. Vastani A, Maria A. Healing of intraoral wounds closed using silk sutures and isoamyl 2-cyanoacrylate glue: a comparative clinical and histologic study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Feb;71(2):241-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.joms.2012.08.032] [PMID]
3. Hollander JE, Singer AJ, Valentine S, Henry MC. Wound registry: development and validation. Ann Emerg Med. 1995 May;25(5):675-85. [DOI:10.1016/S0196-0644(95)70183-4]
4. Khurana JV, Mali AM, Mali RS, Chaudhari AU. Comparative evaluation of healing after periodontal flap surgery using isoamyl 2-cyanoacrylate (bioadhesive material) and silk sutures: A split-mouth clinical study. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2016;20(4):417-22. [DOI:10.4103/0972-124X.194267] [PMID] [PMCID]
5. Koonce SL, Eck DL, Shaddix KK, Perdikis G. A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing N-butyl-2 cyanoacrylate (Histoacryl), octyl cyanoacrylate (Dermabond), and subcuticular suture for closure of surgical incisions. Ann Plast Surg. 2015;74(1):107-10. [DOI:10.1097/SAP.0b013e318289856f] [PMID]
6. Vinters HV, Galil KA, Lundie MJ, Kaufmann JC. The histotoxicity of cyanoacrylates. A selective review. Neuroradiology. 1985;27(4):279-91. [DOI:10.1007/BF00339559] [PMID]
7. Kumar MS, Natta S, Shankar G, Reddy SH, Visalakshi D, Seshiah GV. Comparison between Silk Sutures and Cyanoacrylate Adhesive in Human Mucosa- A Clinical and Histological Study. J Int Oral Health. 2013 Oct;5(5):95-100.
8. Hemalatha R, Hemagaran G. Effectiveness of Honey and Aloe Vera on Post Extraction Healing. J Dent Med Sci. 2015 May;14(5):123-8.
9. Jung GH, Jung S, Park HJ, Oh HK, Kook MS. Factors Influencing Perception of Facial Attractiveness: Gender and Dental Education. J Craniofac Surg. 2018;29(2):e170-e5. [DOI:10.1097/SCS.0000000000004241] [PMID]
10. Naik SP, Punathil S, Shetty P, Jayanti I, Jalaluddin M, Avijeeta A. Effectiveness of Different Bristle Designs of Toothbrushes and Periodontal Status among Fixed Orthodontic Patients: A Double-blind Crossover Design. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018;19(2):150-5. [DOI:10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2229] [PMID]
11. Allen DR, Caffesse RG. Comparison of results following modified Widman flap surgery with and without surgical dressing. J Periodontol. 1983 Aug;54(8):470-5. [DOI:10.1902/jop.1983.54.8.470] [PMID]
12. Sagar P, Prasad K, Lalitha RM, Ranganath K. Cyanoacrylate for Intraoral Wound Closure: A Possibility? Int J Biomater. 2015;2015:165428. [DOI:10.1155/2015/165428] [PMID] [PMCID]
13. Samuel PR, Roberts AC, Nigam A. The use of Indermil (n-butyl cyanoacrylate) in otorhinolaryngology and head and neck surgery. A preliminary report on the first 33 patients. J Laryngol Otol. 1997 Jun;111(6):536-40. [DOI:10.1017/S0022215100137855] [PMID]
14. Turkaslan T, Ozcan H, Dayicioglu D, Ozsoy Z. Use of adhesives in cleft palate surgery: a new flap fixation technique. J Craniofac Surg. 2005 Jul;16(4):719-22. [DOI:10.1097/01.SCS.0000159940.62875.95] [PMID]
15. Collins JA, James PM, Levitsky SA, Bredenburg CE, Anderson RW, Leonard F, et al. Cyanoacrylate adhesives as topical hemostatic aids. II. Clinical use in seven combat casualties. Surgery. 1969;65(2):260-3.
16. Heisterkamp CA 3rd, Simmons RL, Vernick J, Matsumoto T. Solid organ injuries in Vietnam. Emergency hemostasis with N-butyl cyanoacrylate adhesive. Arch Surg. 1970 Jan;100(1):109-12. [DOI:10.1001/archsurg.1970.01340190111026] [PMID]
17. Kulkarni S, Dodwad V, Chava V. Healing of periodontal flaps when closed with silk sutures and N-butyl cyanoacrylate: a clinical and histological study. Indian J Dent Res. 2007 Apr-Jun;18(2):72-7. [DOI:10.4103/0970-9290.32424] [PMID]
18. Hupp JR, Ellis E, Tucker MR. Contemporary Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. St. Louis, Mo: Elsevier, Chicago, 2014:185-200.
19. Newman MG, Takei H, Klokkevold PR, Carranza FA. Carranza's Clinical Periodontology. W.B: Philadelphia, 2015:525-6.
20. Rewainy M, Osman S, El-prince N. The use of n-butyl cyanoacrylate adhesive in the closure of mucoperiosteal flap after the surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molar. Alexandria Dent J. 2015;40(2):152-159. [DOI:10.21608/adjalexu.2015.59139]
21. Stavropoulou C, Atout RN, Brownlee M, Schroth RJ, Kelekis-Cholakis A. A randomized clinical trial of cyanoacrylate tissue adhesives in donor site of connective tissue grafts. J Periodontol. 2019 Jun;90(6):608-615. [DOI:10.1002/JPER.18-0475] [PMID]
22. Al-Belasy FA, Amer MZ. Hemostatic effect of n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (histoacryl) glue in warfarin-treated patients undergoing oral surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003 Dec;61(12):1405-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.joms.2002.12.001] [PMID]
23. Kaderi MA, Menaka KB, Metgud RM, Gharat MR, Naik PS, Ajbani JM, et al. In-vitro evaluation of antibacterial potential of cyanoacrylate tissue adhesives for intraoral wound closure. J Dent Mater Tech. 2017;6(4):163-9.
24. Moghareh-Abed A, Mirmohammadi SH. Comparison of the use of silk sutures and cyanoacrylate tissue glue after periodontal flaps in patients with moderate periodontitis. J Islam Dent Assoc Iran. 2006 Summer;18(59):44-50.
25. Oladega AA, James O, Adeyemo WL. Cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive or silk suture for closure of surgical wound following removal of an impacted mandibular third molar: A randomized controlled study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019 Jan;47(1):93-98. [DOI:10.1016/j.jcms.2018.10.018] [PMID]
26. Khalil HS, Elshall MA, Al-Harbi Y, Al-Asmar S, Al-Wadee M. Healing of oral surgical wounds using 3/0 silk suture and nsbutyl cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive. Egypt Dent J. 2009 Oct; 55(4):2607-13.
27. Breivik H, Borchgrevink PC, Allen SM, Rosseland LA, Romundstad L, Hals EK, Kvarstein G, Stubhaug A. Assessment of pain. Br J Anaesth. 2008 Jul;101(1):17-24. [DOI:10.1093/bja/aen103] [PMID]
28. Saquib AS , Chavan A , Dani NH , Al-Qahtani NA , Al-Qahtani SM , Priyanka N . Comparative Evaluation of N-Butyl Cyanoacrylate and Silk Sutures on Healing of Periodontal Flaps: A Clinico Histological Evaluation. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2018 Jul-Sept.;16(63):253-8.
29. Giray CB, Atasever A, Durgun B, Araz K. Clinical and electron microscope comparison of silk sutures and n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate in human mucosa. Aust Dent J. 1997 Aug;42(4):255-8. [DOI:10.1111/j.1834-7819.1997.tb00130.x] [PMID]
30. Barbosa FI, Corrêa DS, Zenóbio EG, Costa FO, Shibli JA. Dimensional changes between free gingival grafts fixed with ethyl cyanoacrylate and silk sutures. J Int Acad Periodontol. 2009 Apr;11(2):170-6.

XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Volume 5, Issue 4 (Journal of Research in Dental & Maxillofacial Sciences Autumn 2020) Back to browse issues page