1. Asher R, Chacartchi T, Tandlich M, Shapira L, Polak D. Microbial accumulation on different suture materials following oral surgery: a randomized controlled study. Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Feb;23(2):559-565. [
DOI:10.1007/s00784-018-2476-0] [
PMID]
2. Brandt MT, Jenkins WS. Suturing principles for the dentoalveolar surgeon. Dent Clin North Am. 2012 Jan;56(1):281-303, xi. [
DOI:10.1016/j.cden.2011.08.004] [
PMID]
3. Sala-Pérez S, López-Ramírez M, Quinteros-Borgarello M, Valmaseda-Castellón E, Gay-Escoda C. Antibacterial suture vs silk for the surgical removal of impacted lower third molars. A randomized clinical study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2016 Jan 1;21(1):e95-102. [
DOI:10.4317/medoral.20721] [
PMID] [
PMCID]
4. Heaven CJ, Davison CR, Cockcroft PM. Bacterial contamination of nylon corneal sutures. Eye (Lond). 1995;9 (Pt 1):116-8. [
DOI:10.1038/eye.1995.18] [
PMID]
5. Otten JE, Wiedmann-Al-Ahmad M, Jahnke H, Pelz K. Bacterial colonization on different suture materials--a potential risk for intraoral dentoalveolar surgery. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2005 Jul;74(1):627-35. [
DOI:10.1002/jbm.b.30250] [
PMID]
6. Minozzi F, Bollero P, Unfer V, Dolci A, Galli M. The sutures in dentistry. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2009 May-Jun;13(3):217-26.
7. Banche G, Roana J, Mandras N, Amasio M, Gallesio C, Allizond V, et al. Microbial adherence on various intraoral suture materials in patients undergoing dental surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Aug;65(8):1503-7. [
DOI:10.1016/j.joms.2006.10.066] [
PMID]
8. Leknes KN, Røynstrand IT, Selvig KA. Human gingival tissue reactions to silk and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene sutures. J Periodontol. 2005 Jan;76(1):34-42. [
DOI:10.1902/jop.2005.76.1.34] [
PMID]
9. Pelz K, Tödtmann N, Otten JE. Comparison of antibacterial-coated and non-coated suture material in intraoral surgery by isolation of adherent bacteria. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2015;22(3):551-5. [
DOI:10.5604/12321966.1167733] [
PMID]
10. Pons-Vicente O, López-Jiménez L, Sánchez-Garcés MA, Sala-Pérez S, Gay-Escoda C. A comparative study between two different suture materials in oral implantology. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Mar;22(3):282-8. [
DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01993.x] [
PMID]
11. Ford HR, Jones P, Gaines B, Reblock K, Simpkins DL. Intraoperative handling and wound healing: controlled clinical trial comparing coated VICRYL plus antibacterial suture (coated polyglactin 910 suture with triclosan) with coated VICRYL suture (coated polyglactin 910 suture). Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2005 Fall;6(3):313-21. [
DOI:10.1089/sur.2005.6.313] [
PMID]
12. Pratten J, Nazhat SN, Blaker JJ, Boccaccini AR. In vitro attachment of Staphylococcus epidermidis to surgical sutures with and without Ag-containing bioactive glass coating. J Biomater Appl. 2004 Jul;19(1):47-57. [
DOI:10.1177/0885328204043200] [
PMID]
13. Bojar W, Kazmierka K, Szalwinski M, Zareba T. Triclosan-coated sutures in oral surgery. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2009;18(4):401-5.
14. Sethi KS, Karde PA, Joshi CP. Comparative evaluation of sutures coated with triclosan and chlorhexidine for oral biofilm inhibition potential and antimicrobial activity against periodontal pathogens: An in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res. 2016 Sep-Oct;27(5):535-539. [
DOI:10.4103/0970-9290.195644] [
PMID]
15. Matalon S, Kozlovsky A, Kfir A, Levartovsky S, Mazor Y, Slutzky H. The effect of commonly used sutures on inflammation inducing pathogens - an in vitro study.
16. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2013 Oct;41(7):593-7.
17. Edmiston CE, Seabrook GR, Goheen MP, Krepel CJ, Johnson CP, Lewis BD, et al. Bacterial adherence to surgical sutures: can antibacterial-coated sutures reduce the risk of microbial contamination? J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Oct;203(4):481-9. [
DOI:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.06.026] [
PMID]
18. Masini BD, Stinner DJ, Waterman SM, Wenke JC. Bacterial adherence to suture materials. J Surg Educ. 2011 Mar-Apr;68(2):101-4. [
DOI:10.1016/j.jsurg.2010.09.015] [
PMID]
19. Pelz K, Tödtmann N, Otten JE. Comparison of antibacterial-coated and non-coated suture material in intraoral surgery by isolation of adherent bacteria. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2015;22(3):551-5. [
DOI:10.5604/12321966.1167733] [
PMID]
20. Deliaert AE, Van den Kerckhove E, Tuinder S, Fieuws S, Sawor JH, Meesters-Caberg MA, et al. The effect of triclosan-coated sutures in wound healing. A double blind randomised prospective pilot study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009 Jun;62(6):771-3. [
DOI:10.1016/j.bjps.2007.10.075] [
PMID]
21. Venema S, Abbas F, van de Belt-Gritter B, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ, van Hoogmoed CG. In vitro oral biofilm formation on triclosan-coated sutures in the absence and presence of additional antiplaque treatment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Apr;69(4):980-5. [
DOI:10.1016/j.joms.2010.02.030] [
PMID]