Volume 3, Issue 1 (2-2018)
J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci 2018, 3(1): 16-20 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Shafayi Fard S, Pour Tahmasbi A, Mesgari H, Sezavar M, Esmaelian S. Assessment of Neurosensory Changes and their Correlation with the Distance between Dental Implants and the Inferior Alveolar Nerve after Implantation. J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci 2018; 3 (1) :16-20
URL: http://jrdms.dentaliau.ac.ir/article-1-198-en.html
URL: http://jrdms.dentaliau.ac.ir/article-1-198-en.html
1- Assistant Professor , Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Dept, Dental Branch of Tehran,
2- Dentist
3- Post Graduate Student, Oral and Maxillofacial Department, Dental Branch of Tehran, , kmesgari@gmail.com
2- Dentist
3- Post Graduate Student, Oral and Maxillofacial Department, Dental Branch of Tehran, , kmesgari@gmail.com
Abstract: (3351 Views)
Background and aim: Neurosensory disorders after implant insertion are one of the main concerns in implant treatments. Neurosensory disorders can be driven by different factors including the contact of the implant with the nerve, pressure of edema, hematoma, scar, or dental injections. This study aimed at investigating the distance between the implant and the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) and its impact on neurosensory disorders.
Materials and methods: In this descriptive study, panoramic radiographs were taken from 100 patients experiencing neurosensory changes after 10 days of implantation. The patients were reassessed 4 weeks later, and the distance (mm) between the implants and the IAN was measured. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.
Results: All patients experienced neurosensory changes 10 days after implantation. Four weeks after surgery, 82 patients healed: the distance between the implants and the IAN was 1-2 mm in 16 patients and 2 mm in 66 patients. In 18 patients, neurosensory changes persisted; in this group, the distance between the implants and the IAN was less than 1 mm in 11 patients, 1-2 mm in 6 patients, and more than 2 mm in 1 patient. The results indicated that the chance of healing of neurosensory changes is significantly correlated with the distance between the implant and the IAN (P<0.01). This correlation was not significant with respect to age or gender (P<0.9).
Conclusion: It seems that the lesser is the distance between the implant and the IAN, the lower is the chance of healing of neurosensory changes.
Type of Study: Original article |
Subject:
Oral & maxillofacial surgery
References
1. Lin MH, Mau LP, Cochran DL, Shieh YS, Huang PH, Huang RY. Risk assessment of inferior alveolar nerve injury for immediate implant placement in the posterior mandible: A virtual implant placement study. J Dent. 2014 Mar;42(3):263-70 [DOI:10.1016/j.jdent.2013.12.014] [PMID]
2. Gennaro P, Chisci G, Gabriele G, Iannetti G. Conservative surgical and microsurgical techniques for the management of dental implants that impinge on the inferior alveolar nerve. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014;52:566-8 [DOI:10.1016/j.bjoms.2014.03.026] [PMID]
3. Bartling R, Freeman K, Kraut RA. The incidence of altered sensation of the mental nerve after mandibular implant placement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999 Dec;57(12):1408-12. [DOI:10.1016/S0278-2391(99)90720-6]
4. Wismeijer D, van Waas MA, Vermeeren JI, Kalk W. Patients' perception of sensory disturbances of the mental nerve before and after implant surgery: A prospective study of 110 patients. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997 Aug;35(4):254-9. [DOI:10.1016/S0266-4356(97)90043-7]
5. Walton JN. Altered sensation associated with implants in the anterior mandible: A prospective study. J Prosthet Dent 2000 Apr;83(4):443-9. [DOI:10.1016/S0022-3913(00)70039-4]
6. Karthik K, Sivaraj S, Thangaswamy V. Evaluation of implant success: A review of past and present concepts J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2013 Jun; 5(Suppl 1): S117-S119. [DOI:10.4103/0975-7406.113310] [PMID] [PMCID]
7. Pogrel MA, Thamby S. Permanent nerve involvement resulting from inferior alveolar nerve blocks. J Am Dent Assoc. 2000 Jul;131:901-7. [DOI:10.14219/jada.archive.2000.0308] [PMID]
8. Greenstein G, Cavallaro J, Tarnow D. Practical application of anatomy for the dental implant surgeon. J Periodontol. 2008 Oct;79(10):1833-46. [DOI:10.1902/jop.2008.080086] [PMID]
9. Juodzbalys G, Wang H .Identification of the Mandibular Vital Structures: Practical Clinical Applications of Anatomy and Radiological Examination Methods. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2010 Apr-Jun; 1(2): e1. [DOI:10.5037/jomr.2010.1201] [PMCID]
10. Kim JE, Shim JS, Huh JB, Rim JS, Lee JY, Shin SW. Altered sensation caused by peri-implantitis: a case reportOral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013 Jul;116(1):e9-13. [DOI:10.1016/j.oooo.2011.10.042] [PMID]
11. Tufekcioglu S, Delilbasi C, Gurler G, Dilaver E, Ozer N. Is 2 mm a safe distance from the inferior alveolar canal to avoid neurosensory complications in implant surgery? Niger J Clin Pract. 2017 Mar;20(3):274-7. [DOI:10.4103/1119-3077.183240] [PMID]
12. Cassetta M, Stefanelli LV, Giansanti M, Calasso S. Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical template. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 May-Jun;27(3):655-63.
13. Bartling R, Freeman K, Kraut R A. The incidence of altered sensation of the mental nerve after mandibular implant placement. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 1 999 Dec;57(12):1408-10. [DOI:10.1016/S0278-2391(99)90720-6]
14. Greenstein G, Tarnow D. The mental foramen and nerve: clinical and anatomical factors related to dental implant placement: a literature review. J Periodontol. 2006 Dec;77(12):1933-43. [DOI:10.1902/jop.2006.060197] [PMID]
15. Kopecka D, Simunek A, Streblov J, Slezak R, Capek L. Measurement of the Interantral Bone in Implant Dentistry Using Panoramic Radiography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography: A Human Radiographic Study West Indian Med J. 2014 Sep; 63(5): 503-509. [DOI:10.7727/wimj.2013.059] [PMID] [PMCID]
16. Garg AK, Vicari A. Radiographic modalities for diagnosis and treatment planning in implant dentistry.Implant Soc. 1995;5(5):7-11.
17. Lorenzoni FC, Coelho PG, Bonfante G, Carvalho RM, Silva NR, Suzuki M, et al. Sealing Capability and SEM Observation of the Implant-Abutment Interface. Int J Dent 2011;2011:864183. [DOI:10.1155/2011/864183] [PMID] [PMCID]
18. Khanade K, Sasangohar F, Sutherland SC, Alexander KE. Deriving Information Requirements for a Smart Nursing System for Intensive Care Units. Crit Care Nurs Q. 2018 Jan/Mar;41(1):29-37. [DOI:10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000183] [PMID]
19. Lindquist LW, Carlsson GE, Jemt T. A prospective 15-year follow-up study of mandibular fixed prostheses supported by osseointegrated implants. Clinical results and marginal bone loss. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1996 Dec;7(4):329-36. [DOI:10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070405.x] [PMID]
20. Lozada JL, James RA, Boskovic M, Cordova C, Emanuelli S. Surgical repair of peri-implant defects. J Oral Implantol. 1990;16(1):42-6.
21. Reynolds RA. CT scanning for dental implantology. RAD Magazine. 1999; 25(285):44-6.
22. Rangert B, Krogh PH, Langer B, Van Roekel N. Bending overload and implant fracture: a retrospective clinical analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1995;May-Jun;10(3):326-34.
23. Hobkirk JA, Havthoulas TK. The influence of mandibular deformation, implant numbers, and loading position on detected forces in abutments supporting fixed implant superstructures. J Prosthet Dent. 1998 Aug;80(2):169-74. [DOI:10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70106-4]
24. Stanford CM. Biomechanical and functional behavior of implants. Adv Dent Res. 1999;13:88-92. [DOI:10.1177/08959374990130012101] [PMID]
25. Garber DA. The esthetic implant: letting restoration be the guide. J Oral Implantol. 1996;22(1):45-50.
26. Grondahl K, Lekholm U. The predictive value of radiographic diagnosis of implant instability. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997 Jan-Feb;12(1):59-64.
27. Potter BJ, Shrout MK, Russell CM, Sharawy M. Implant site assessment using panoramic cross-sectional tomographic imaging. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1997 Oct;84(4):436-42. [DOI:10.1016/S1079-2104(97)90045-7]
28. Juodzbalys G, Wang HL, Sabalys G. Injury of the Inferior Alveolar Nerve during Implant Placement:a Literature Review. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2011 Apr 1;2(1):e1. [DOI:10.5037/jomr.2011.2101] [PMID] [PMCID]
29. Shavit I, juodzbalys G. Inferior alveolar nerve injuries following implant placement importance of early diagnosis and treatment: a systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2014 Dec 29;5(4):e2. [DOI:10.5037/jomr.2014.5402] [PMID] [PMCID]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
