Volume 3, Issue 1 (2-2018)
J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci 2018, 3(1): 27-33 |
Back to browse issues page
1- Assistant professor, Prosthodontics Dept, School of Dentistry,
2- Assistant professor, Fixed Prosthodontics Dept, Member of implant research center, Dental Branch of Tehran, , koosha.sa2015@gmail.com
3- Dentist
2- Assistant professor, Fixed Prosthodontics Dept, Member of implant research center, Dental Branch of Tehran, , koosha.sa2015@gmail.com
3- Dentist
Abstract: (2903 Views)
Background and aim: Changes in the physical properties of casts retrieved from disinfected impressions are a common problem in the fabrication of dental prostheses. However, there are limited data available about the effect of disinfecting solutions on the surface roughness of casts. This study aimed to assess the surface roughness of casts retrieved from addition silicone impressions disinfected by immersion in three different disinfectants for 5 and 30 minutes.
Materials and methods: This in-vitro experimental study was conducted on 49 casts in 7 groups (n=7). A standard stainless steel die was used according to ANSI/ADA specification no. 25, and impressions were made using a low-viscosity addition silicone impression material. The impressions were disinfected by immersion in 1% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), 2.4% glutaraldehyde, or 5% povidone-iodine for 5 and 30 minutes. All impressions were poured with type IV dental stone, and their surface roughness (Ra) was measured using a digital hand-held roughness tester. Data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's test.
Results: One-way ANOVA showed a statistically significant difference between the control group and the other 6 groups (P=0.004). 1% NaOCl/5 minutes was the only group which presented a different result from the control group (P=0.012). Two-way ANOVA showed that over time, the surface roughness of casts retrieved from silicone impressions disinfected by immersion in a disinfectant decreased (P=0.002), but no significant difference was noted between the disinfectant agents (P=0.243).
Conclusion: The type of the disinfectant had no significant effect on surface roughness, although an increased duration of disinfection decreased the surface roughness of casts.
Materials and methods: This in-vitro experimental study was conducted on 49 casts in 7 groups (n=7). A standard stainless steel die was used according to ANSI/ADA specification no. 25, and impressions were made using a low-viscosity addition silicone impression material. The impressions were disinfected by immersion in 1% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), 2.4% glutaraldehyde, or 5% povidone-iodine for 5 and 30 minutes. All impressions were poured with type IV dental stone, and their surface roughness (Ra) was measured using a digital hand-held roughness tester. Data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's test.
Results: One-way ANOVA showed a statistically significant difference between the control group and the other 6 groups (P=0.004). 1% NaOCl/5 minutes was the only group which presented a different result from the control group (P=0.012). Two-way ANOVA showed that over time, the surface roughness of casts retrieved from silicone impressions disinfected by immersion in a disinfectant decreased (P=0.002), but no significant difference was noted between the disinfectant agents (P=0.243).
Conclusion: The type of the disinfectant had no significant effect on surface roughness, although an increased duration of disinfection decreased the surface roughness of casts.
Type of Study: Original article |
Subject:
Oral & maxillofacial surgery
References
1. Johnson GH, Chellis KD, Gordon GE, Lepe X. Dimensional stability and detail reproduction of irreversible hydrocolloid and elastomeric impressions disinfected by immersion. J Prosthet Dent. 1998 Apr;79(4):446-53. [DOI:10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70160-X]
2. Kess RS, Combe EC, Sparks BS. Effect of surface treatments on the wettability of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2000 Jul;84(1):98-102. [DOI:10.1067/mpr.2000.106720] [PMID]
3. Jagger DC, Al Jabra O, Harrison A, Vowles RW, McNally L. The effect of a range of disinfectants on the dimensional accuracy of some impression materials. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2004 Dec;12(4):154-60.
4. Sinavarat P, Visayrath S. Effects of disinfection procedures on surface quality of compound impressions and the resultant gypsum casts. M Dent J. 2014 Sep;34(1):19-27.
5. Beyerle MP, Hensley DM, Bradley DV Jr, Schwartz RS, Hilton TJ. Immersion disinfection of irreversible hydrocolloid impressions with sodium hypochlorite. Part I: Microbiology. Int J Prosthodont. 1994 May-Jun;7(3):234-8.
6. Rodriguez JM, Curtis RV, Bartlett DW. Surface roughness of impression materials and dental stones scanned by non-contacting laser profilometry. Dent Mater. 2009 Apr;25(4):500-5. [DOI:10.1016/j.dental.2008.10.003] [PMID]
7. Ho DD, Byington RE, Schooley RT, Flynn T, Rota TR, Hirsch MS. Infrequency of isolation of HTLV-III virus from saliva in AIDS. N Engl J Med. 1985 Dec 19;313(25):1606. [DOI:10.1056/NEJM198512193132511]
8. Herrera SP, Merchant VA. Dimensional stability of dental impressions after immersion disinfection. J Am Dent Assoc. 1986 Sep;113(3):419-22. [DOI:10.14219/jada.archive.1986.0214] [PMID]
9. Moslehifard E, Lotfipour F, Robati Anaraki M, Shafee E, Tamjid-Shabestari S, Ghaffari T. Efficacy of Disinfection of Dental Stone Casts: Virkon versus Sodium Hypochlorite. J Dent (Tehran). 2015 Mar;12(3):206-15.
10. Malaviya N, Shrestha A. Comparative Evaluation of Surface Detail Changes and Compressive Strength of Gypsum Casts and Dies After Immersion in Hypochlorite Solution and Microwave Irradiation - An in Vitro Study. IJCMR. 2016;3(6):1547-51.
11. Stern MA, Johnson GH, Toolson LB. An evaluation of dental stones after repeated exposure to spray disinfectants. Part I: Abrasion and compressive strength. J Prosthet Dent. 1991 May;65(5):713-8. [DOI:10.1016/0022-3913(91)90211-E]
12. Lepe X, Johnson GH. Accuracy of polyether and addition silicone after long-term immersion disinfection. J Prosthet Dent. 1997 Sep;78(3):245-9. [DOI:10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70021-0]
13. Demajo JK, Cassar V, Farrugia C, Millan-Sango D, Sammut C, Valdramidis V, et al. Effectiveness of Disinfectants on Antimicrobial and Physical Properties of Dental Impression Materials. Int J Prosthodont. 2016 Jan-Feb;29(1):63-7. [DOI:10.11607/ijp.4358] [PMID]
14. Roy SM, Sridevi J, Kalavathy N. An evaluation of the mechanical properties of Type III and Type IV gypsum mixed with two disinfectant solutions. Indian J Dent Res. 2010 Jul-Sep;21(3):374-9. [DOI:10.4103/0970-9290.70807] [PMID]
15. Amin WM, Al-Ali MH, Al Tarawneh SK, Taha ST, Saleh MW, Ereifij N. The effects of disinfectants on dimensional accuracy and surface quality of impression materials and gypsum casts. J Clin Med Res. 2009 Jun;1(2):81-9. [DOI:10.4021/jocmr2009.04.1235]
16. Abdelaziz KM, Combe EC, Hodges JS. The effect of disinfectants on the properties of dental gypsum: 1. Mechanical properties. J Prosthodont. 2002 Sep;11(3):161-7. [DOI:10.1053/jpro.2002.126860] [PMID]
17. Kalantari MH, Malekzadeh A, Emami A. The effect of disinfection with sodium hypochlorite 0.5% on dimensional stability of condensation silicone impression materials of speedex and irasil. J Dent (Shiraz). 2014 Sep;15(3):98-103.
18. Ahila SC, Subramaniam E. Comparative evaluation of dimensional stability and surface quality of gypsum casts retrieved from disinfected addition silicone impressions at various time intervals: An in vitro study. J Dent Oral Hyg. 2012 Dec;4(4):34-43.
19. Ahila SC, Thulasingam C. Effect of disinfection on gypsum casts retrieved from addition and condensation silicone impressions disinfected by immersion and spray methods. SRM J Res Dent Sci. 2014 Aug;5(3):163-169. [DOI:10.4103/0976-433X.138724]
20. Kotha SB, Ramakrishnaiah R, Devang Divakar D, Celur SL, Qasim S, Matinlinna JP. Effect of disinfection and sterilization on the tensile strength, surface roughness, and wettability of elastomers. J Investig Clin Dent. 2017 Nov;8(4). [DOI:10.1111/jicd.12244] [PMID]
21. Nishikiori R, Sawajiri M, Okuda T, Otoshi A, Watanabe K, Hirata I, et al. Effect of ozonated water on the surface roughness of dental stone casts. Dent Mater J. 2018 May 31. [DOI:10.4012/dmj.2017-223] [PMID]
22. Himanshu A, Anubha A, Varun K, Jyotsna S. Study of the effect of disinfectant solutions on the Physical properties of dental impressions. Indian J Dent Sci. 2014 Sep;3(6):1-6.
23. da Rosa GM, da Silva LM, de Menezes M, do Vale HF, Regalado DF, Pontes DG. Effect of whitening dentifrices on the surface roughness of a nanohybrid composite resin. Eur J Dent. 2016 Apr-Jun;10(2):170-5. [DOI:10.4103/1305-7456.178305] [PMID] [PMCID]
24. Labašová E. Measurement of changes of the surface roughness in sliding area. Am Int J Contemp Res. 2013 Apr;3(4):1-5.
25. Ivanovski S, Savage NW, Brockhurst PJ, Bird PS. Disinfection of dental stone casts: antimicrobial effects and physical property alterations. Dent Mater. 1995 Jan;11(1):19-23. [DOI:10.1016/0109-5641(95)80004-2]
26. Kawamoto A. Effects of mixing disinfectant solutions on properties of stone models [abstract]. J Nihon U. 1995;37:128-29. [DOI:10.5940/jcrsj.37.Supplement_128]
27. Abass SM. The Effect of Disinfectant on the Microstructure of Dental Stone at Different Time Intervals. MDJ. 2007;4(2):199-205.
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |