<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<journal>
<title>Journal of Research in Dental and Maxillofacial Sciences</title>
<title_fa></title_fa>
<short_title>J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci</short_title>
<subject>Medical Sciences</subject>
<web_url>http://jrdms.dentaliau.ac.ir</web_url>
<journal_hbi_system_id>1</journal_hbi_system_id>
<journal_hbi_system_user>admin</journal_hbi_system_user>
<journal_id_issn>2588-4166</journal_id_issn>
<journal_id_issn_online>2383-2754</journal_id_issn_online>
<journal_id_pii></journal_id_pii>
<journal_id_doi>10.66224/jrdms</journal_id_doi>
<journal_id_iranmedex></journal_id_iranmedex>
<journal_id_magiran></journal_id_magiran>
<journal_id_sid></journal_id_sid>
<journal_id_nlai></journal_id_nlai>
<journal_id_science></journal_id_science>
<language>en</language>
<pubdate>
	<type>jalali</type>
	<year>1405</year>
	<month>3</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<pubdate>
	<type>gregorian</type>
	<year>2026</year>
	<month>6</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<volume>11</volume>
<number>2</number>
<publish_type>online</publish_type>
<publish_edition>1</publish_edition>
<article_type>fulltext</article_type>
<articleset>
	<article>


	<language>en</language>
	<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
	<title_fa></title_fa>
	<title>Marginal Adaptation of GuttaFlow 2, GuttaFlow Bioseal, and AH Plus in the Apical Third of Human Teeth Obturated by the Single-Cone Technique</title>
	<subject_fa>Endodontics</subject_fa>
	<subject>Endodontics</subject>
	<content_type_fa>Original article</content_type_fa>
	<content_type>Original article</content_type>
	<abstract_fa></abstract_fa>
	<abstract>&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:13pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;line-height:105%&quot;&gt;&lt;span new=&quot;&quot; roman=&quot;&quot; style=&quot;font-family:&quot; times=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;line-height:105%&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:&quot; verdana=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:#2e74b5&quot;&gt;Background and Aim&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;line-height:105%&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:&quot; verdana=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:#2e74b5&quot;&gt;:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt; &lt;span style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;line-height:105%&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:&quot; verdana=&quot;&quot;&gt;This study compared the marginal adaptation of GuttaFlow 2, GuttaFlow Bioseal, and AH Plus in the apical third of human single-canal teeth obturated by the single-cone technique. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:13pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;line-height:105%&quot;&gt;&lt;span new=&quot;&quot; roman=&quot;&quot; style=&quot;font-family:&quot; times=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;line-height:105%&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:&quot; verdana=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:#2e74b5&quot;&gt;Materials and Methods: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;line-height:105%&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:&quot; verdana=&quot;&quot;&gt;This in vitro study evaluated 51 eligible extracted single-canal maxillary incisors. The teeth underwent biomechanical preparation with BioRaCe rotary system to #40/4%, and were then randomly divided into 3 experimental groups (n=17) of GuttaFlow 2, GuttaFlow Bioseal, and AH Plus. The canals were rinsed with 17% EDTA for 1 minute, 5.25% NaOCl for 30 seconds, and 2 mL of distilled water for smear layer removal, and were obturated with the single-cone obturation technique. The roots were then transversely sectioned at 3 and 6 mm from the apex, and the gap at the root filling material-canal wall interface was measured under a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Data were analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests (alpha=0.05). &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:13pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;line-height:105%&quot;&gt;&lt;span new=&quot;&quot; roman=&quot;&quot; style=&quot;font-family:&quot; times=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;line-height:105%&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:&quot; verdana=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:#2e74b5&quot;&gt;Results: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;line-height:105%&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:&quot; verdana=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:#0e101a&quot;&gt;At 3 mm distance from the apex, the mean gap size in the GuttaFlow Bioseal group (12.65&amp;plusmn;4.919 &amp;micro;m) was significantly larger than that in GuttaFlow (7.7&amp;plusmn;2.969 &amp;micro;m) and AH Plus (6.89&amp;plusmn;4.58 &amp;micro;m) groups (P&lt;0.05), but no significant difference was detected at 6 mm from the apex among the three groups (P=0.121).&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;line-height:105%&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:&quot;Verdana&quot;,sans-serif&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:13pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;line-height:105%&quot;&gt;&lt;span new=&quot;&quot; roman=&quot;&quot; style=&quot;font-family:&quot; times=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;line-height:105%&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:&quot; verdana=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:#2e74b5&quot;&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt; &lt;span style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;line-height:105%&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:&quot; verdana=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:#0e101a&quot;&gt;Under the limitations of this in vitro study, the results indicated that GuttaFlow Bioseal had poorer marginal adaptation than AH Plus and GuttaFlow at 3 mm from the apex; however, marginal adaptation of sealers was not significantly different at 6 mm from the apex.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;</abstract>
	<keyword_fa></keyword_fa>
	<keyword>Dental Marginal Adaptation, Epoxy Resin-Based Root Canal Sealer, GuttaFlow, Root Canal Therapy</keyword>
	<start_page>107</start_page>
	<end_page>113</end_page>
	<web_url>http://jrdms.dentaliau.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-2868-1&amp;slc_lang=en&amp;sid=1</web_url>


<author_list>
	<author>
	<first_name>Sayeh</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Abbasnejad</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email>Sayeh.abbasnejad@gmail.com</email>
	<code>100319475328460016913</code>
	<orcid>100319475328460016913</orcid>
	<coreauthor>Yes
</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Endodontics, Dental School, Islamic Azad University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Faezeh </first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Abbasi </last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>100319475328460016914</code>
	<orcid>100319475328460016914</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Endodontics, Dental School, Islamic Azad University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Solmaz </first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Araghi </last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>100319475328460016915</code>
	<orcid>100319475328460016915</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Endodontics, Dental School, Islamic Azad University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Sohrab</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name> Tour Savadkouhi</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>100319475328460016916</code>
	<orcid>100319475328460016916</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Endodontics, Dental School, Islamic Azad University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


</author_list>


	</article>
</articleset>
</journal>
